You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Raphael Bircher <r....@gmx.ch> on 2012/01/07 13:33:43 UTC
Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Hi all
Is sameone around here with Java 7? I hear that LO 3.4.x has trubble
with Java 7. So this is probabily also a problem at AOO 3.4. Can sameone
test this?
Greetings Raphael
--
My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Raphael Bircher <r....@gmx.ch>.
Hi Carl
Yes it matters. Use the one here http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/
The builds from Ariel does not overwrite a 3.3 version
Greetings Raphael
Am 07.01.12 16:16, schrieb Carl Marcum:
> Does it matter if I use:
> "OOo-Dev_DEV300m106_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US" download from website
> or
> "OOo_3.4.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US-2012-01-07_04:12:57" from
> buildbot
>
> Will either one overwrite OOo 3.3?
>
> Thanks,
> Carl
>
--
My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Carl Marcum <ca...@codebuilders.net>.
Does it matter if I use:
"OOo-Dev_DEV300m106_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US" download from website
or
"OOo_3.4.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US-2012-01-07_04:12:57" from buildbot
Will either one overwrite OOo 3.3?
Thanks,
Carl
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Raphael Bircher <r....@gmx.ch>.
Hi carl
Am 07.01.12 13:55, schrieb Carl Marcum:
> Hi Raphael,
>
> Do mean building or just testing on of the snapshots?
Only at the snapshot, you have not to build AOO
>
> I'm running java version "1.7.0_b147-icedtea"
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (fedora-2.0.3.fc16-x86_64)
Same people tells that Java 7 is not recognized from OpenOffice.org
under Extras - Options - Java. I don't know if this is true, but if it's
true it should be solved befor 3.4.
>
>
> If testing a snapshot, any idea which features should be tested?
- Extension Manager
- SVG Import
- Regular expressions at the search function.
This are same exemple.
Greetings Raphael
--
My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Carl Marcum <cm...@apache.org>.
Hi Raphael,
Do mean building or just testing on of the snapshots?
I'm running java version "1.7.0_b147-icedtea"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (fedora-2.0.3.fc16-x86_64)
If testing a snapshot, any idea which features should be tested?
I can do that today.
Best regards,
Carl
On 01/07/2012 07:33 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Is sameone around here with Java 7? I hear that LO 3.4.x has trubble
> with Java 7. So this is probabily also a problem at AOO 3.4. Can sameone
> test this?
>
> Greetings Raphael
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by "O.Felka" <ol...@gmx.de>.
Am 07.01.2012 18:44, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
> Hi Olaf,
>
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 05:22:13PM +0100, O.Felka wrote:
>> We have Issue 118352: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352
>
> the issue is assigned to you. Did you start working on fixing it?
>
>
> Regards
I'm not a developer. I'm the default assignee for these issues.
Olaf
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>.
Hi Olaf,
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 05:22:13PM +0100, O.Felka wrote:
> We have Issue 118352: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352
the issue is assigned to you. Did you start working on fixing it?
Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Mechtilde <oo...@mechtilde.de>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello Olaf,
Am 07.01.2012 17:22, schrieb O.Felka:
> Am 07.01.2012 16:35, schrieb Raphael Bircher:
>> Hi Oliver
>>
>> Am 07.01.12 16:28, schrieb Oliver Brinzing:
>>> Hi Raphael,
>>>
>>>> Is sameone around here with Java 7? I hear that LO 3.4.x has trubble
>>>> with Java 7. So this is
>>>> probabily also a problem at AOO 3.4. Can sameone test this?
>>> i installed aoo34m1 revision 1226179 from
>>> http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/
>>> on my win xp 32bit vm with jre 1.6_24 - no problems
>>>
>>> now i uninstalled jre 1.6_24 and installed jre 1.7_02,
>>> but aoo does not find the new jre.
>>> i cannot add the jre 1.7 via "tools - options - ooo-dev - java add.."
>>> aoo tells me, the path does not contain a jre...
>> Thanks for the feedback. Then we have a problem... do you write a issue?
>> Or you prefer to fix it your self ;-)
>>
>> Greetings Raphael
>>
>>
>
> We have Issue 118352: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352
>
> Do we know what we have to test if AOO will support JRE 7.x? The
> detection on Tools | Options will not be enough.
One thing we should test ist to start base and generate a database with
the internal DBMS. An then create a form and a report via reportbuilder.
All these things need a working java version
Kind regards
Mechtilde
>
> Olaf
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk8IfxwACgkQucZfh1OziSswmQCeIbx5JyG+0K81hXDxf2HZVWkJ
44MAnRtVeLoMHHMLqWBgcWwkzfORIYhF
=4RWj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by "O.Felka" <ol...@gmx.de>.
Am 07.01.2012 16:35, schrieb Raphael Bircher:
> Hi Oliver
>
> Am 07.01.12 16:28, schrieb Oliver Brinzing:
>> Hi Raphael,
>>
>>> Is sameone around here with Java 7? I hear that LO 3.4.x has trubble
>>> with Java 7. So this is
>>> probabily also a problem at AOO 3.4. Can sameone test this?
>> i installed aoo34m1 revision 1226179 from
>> http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/
>> on my win xp 32bit vm with jre 1.6_24 - no problems
>>
>> now i uninstalled jre 1.6_24 and installed jre 1.7_02,
>> but aoo does not find the new jre.
>> i cannot add the jre 1.7 via "tools - options - ooo-dev - java add.."
>> aoo tells me, the path does not contain a jre...
> Thanks for the feedback. Then we have a problem... do you write a issue?
> Or you prefer to fix it your self ;-)
>
> Greetings Raphael
>
>
We have Issue 118352: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352
Do we know what we have to test if AOO will support JRE 7.x? The
detection on Tools | Options will not be enough.
Olaf
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Raphael Bircher <r....@gmx.ch>.
Hi Oliver
Am 07.01.12 16:28, schrieb Oliver Brinzing:
> Hi Raphael,
>
>> Is sameone around here with Java 7? I hear that LO 3.4.x has trubble with Java 7. So this is
>> probabily also a problem at AOO 3.4. Can sameone test this?
> i installed aoo34m1 revision 1226179 from http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/
> on my win xp 32bit vm with jre 1.6_24 - no problems
>
> now i uninstalled jre 1.6_24 and installed jre 1.7_02,
> but aoo does not find the new jre.
> i cannot add the jre 1.7 via "tools - options - ooo-dev - java add.."
> aoo tells me, the path does not contain a jre...
Thanks for the feedback. Then we have a problem... do you write a issue?
Or you prefer to fix it your self ;-)
Greetings Raphael
--
My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Oliver Brinzing <Ol...@gmx.de>.
Hi Raphael,
> Is sameone around here with Java 7? I hear that LO 3.4.x has trubble with Java 7. So this is
> probabily also a problem at AOO 3.4. Can sameone test this?
i installed aoo34m1 revision 1226179 from http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/
on my win xp 32bit vm with jre 1.6_24 - no problems
now i uninstalled jre 1.6_24 and installed jre 1.7_02,
but aoo does not find the new jre.
i cannot add the jre 1.7 via "tools - options - ooo-dev - java add.."
aoo tells me, the path does not contain a jre...
Regards
Oliver
--
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>.
Hi Andrea,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:13:04PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 06:01:59PM +0100, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
> >>seems lo fixed this issue.
> >me, I haven't seen it. LO has a different license, so AOO can not take
> >its code. This leads to duplication, as we must find our own way to fix
> >it.
>
> This applies to actual code, but I don't see anything wrong in
> avoiding duplicate investigations or development discussions; i.e.,
> reading issue discussions in the LibreOffice Bugzilla, or even
> discussing together with LibreOffice developers bugs and strategies
> to fix them is not hampered by incompatible licensing and in some
> cases will probably make sense.
notice that in this case there was actual code: Oliver said there was a fix.
This applies to other examples, like
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=117010#c20
Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Andrea Pescetti <pe...@apache.org>.
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 06:01:59PM +0100, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
>> seems lo fixed this issue.
> me, I haven't seen it. LO has a different license, so AOO can not take
> its code. This leads to duplication, as we must find our own way to fix
> it.
This applies to actual code, but I don't see anything wrong in avoiding
duplicate investigations or development discussions; i.e., reading issue
discussions in the LibreOffice Bugzilla, or even discussing together
with LibreOffice developers bugs and strategies to fix them is not
hampered by incompatible licensing and in some cases will probably make
sense.
That said, thanks for fixing this in Apache OpenOffice too!
Regards,
Andrea.
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by "O.Felka" <ol...@gmx.de>.
Am 15.01.2012 01:46, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
> Hi there,
>
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 09:36:34AM +0100, O.Felka wrote:
>>>> I'm using this Office
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1229535/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_de.exe
>>>> on WinXP - SP3.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,Ok, without an official AOO build QA work is nonsense. It makes no sense to jumpp from developer playground A to developer build b to c to see if something is fixed.
>>>> Olaf
>>>>
>>> I'm using
>>> http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1229535/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Zoltan
>>>
>>
>> Ok, I see.
>> Without an official AOO build QA work is nonsense.
>
> I tend to disagree here. It seems you're not subscribed to the issues
> mailing list (ooo-issues-subscribe@incubator.apache.org). Many issues
> have been discovered (and even solved) since we started providing builds
> for testing purposes.
I'm writing about AOO and Java 7 (see subject).
>
> Calling this a nonsense is underestimating the efforts of people doing the
> build, people doing the QA (Regina, Reizinger, Oliver, et. al.), and
> people solving the issues.
>
> Just to quote an example, Regina's work testing the new SVG
> implementation is remarkable, and I'm sure Armin appreciates it.
This example doesn't fit. I've you've watched the issue
(https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352) and this thread
you'll see that I've been told to try
- http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/
-
http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1229535/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
- http://people.apache.org/~orw/
That's not the same as the work of Regina and Armin.
>
> Facts have shown that builds are useful, we have volunteers willing to
> help QAing, so we should keep providing them until we have official weekly
> Developer Snapshots.
>
> That said, I agree that the situation is suboptimal, but we do not have
> buildboots for all platforms yet.
>
>> It makes no sense
>> to jump from developer playground A to developer build b to c to see
>> if something is fixed or not.
>
>
> Back to the present issue, as I wrote in the bug, we have to split:
>
> a) this issue, detect JRE 7.0 version
> b) issues with things that don't work with JRE 7
>
>
> For (b), please open new bug reports of the kind "[java 7] XXX does not work"
> or the like. And set them as blockers for i118352 when/if they are
> confirmed.
And I wrote that this are two sides of one medal. Fixing a) without b)
is senseless. So it has to be fixed in one go.
Regards
Olaf
>
>
> Regards
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>.
Hi there,
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 09:36:34AM +0100, O.Felka wrote:
> >>I'm using this Office
> >>http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1229535/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_de.exe
> >>on WinXP - SP3.
> >>
> >>Regards,Ok, without an official AOO build QA work is nonsense. It makes no sense to jumpp from developer playground A to developer build b to c to see if something is fixed.
> >>Olaf
> >>
> >I'm using
> >http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1229535/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
> >
> >
> >Regards,
> >Zoltan
> >
>
> Ok, I see.
> Without an official AOO build QA work is nonsense.
I tend to disagree here. It seems you're not subscribed to the issues
mailing list (ooo-issues-subscribe@incubator.apache.org). Many issues
have been discovered (and even solved) since we started providing builds
for testing purposes.
Calling this a nonsense is underestimating the efforts of people doing the
build, people doing the QA (Regina, Reizinger, Oliver, et. al.), and
people solving the issues.
Just to quote an example, Regina's work testing the new SVG
implementation is remarkable, and I'm sure Armin appreciates it.
Facts have shown that builds are useful, we have volunteers willing to
help QAing, so we should keep providing them until we have official weekly
Developer Snapshots.
That said, I agree that the situation is suboptimal, but we do not have
buildboots for all platforms yet.
> It makes no sense
> to jump from developer playground A to developer build b to c to see
> if something is fixed or not.
Back to the present issue, as I wrote in the bug, we have to split:
a) this issue, detect JRE 7.0 version
b) issues with things that don't work with JRE 7
For (b), please open new bug reports of the kind "[java 7] XXX does not work"
or the like. And set them as blockers for i118352 when/if they are
confirmed.
Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by "O.Felka" <ol...@gmx.de>.
Am 13.01.2012 17:33, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán:
> 2012.01.13. 17:21 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:
>> Am 13.01.2012 17:18, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán:
>>> 2012.01.13. 17:06 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:
>>>> Am 13.01.2012 16:55, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán:
>>>>> 2012.01.13. 16:43 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:
>>>>>> Am 13.01.2012 16:21, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán:
>>>>>>> 2012.01.13. 14:30 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:
>>>>>>>> Am 12.01.2012 03:35, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the fix. Could you set up the issue status?
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> IIRC I resolved as fixed only 2 issues I fixed in order to test
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>>> bugzilla instancia was keeping my can-confirm privileges.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Now I'm uncertain about what to do in these cases. In
>>>>>>>>> OpenOffice.org
>>>>>>>>> times, the developer who fixed the issue didn't resolve it as
>>>>>>>>> fixed.
>>>>>>>>> Someone else had to do the QA in order to confirm the fix and
>>>>>>>>> change the
>>>>>>>>> issue status.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure what the new rules are, so I will wait to resolve
>>>>>>>>> this as
>>>>>>>>> fixed until someone can confirm it is actually fixed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Due to issue 118352 I've made some tests with AOO and Java 7.
>>>>>>>> Java 7 is detected now by AOO but AOO doesn't support it (see issue
>>>>>>>> 118352).
>>>>>>>> So my conclusion is not to detect it if it's not supported.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Olaf
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Try orw's build it works with java 1.7. :
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~orw/
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Zoltan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's the same with the builds of Olive: Java 7 has been detected but
>>>>>> the Wizard doesn't work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Olaf
>>>>>>
>>>>> It shows a debug messeage:
>>>>>
>>>>> Debug Output
>>>>> ---------------------------
>>>>> Error: SfxHTMLParser::SfxHTMLParser: Wo kommt der ZS her?
>>>>> From File
>>>>> c:/AOO/sources/firsttasks/main/sfx2/source/bastyp/sfxhtml.cxx
>>>>> at Line 79
>>>>> Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump)
>>>>>
>>>>> Click no, then second debug error:
>>>>> ---------------------------
>>>>> Debug Output
>>>>> ---------------------------
>>>>> Error: Don't close the medium when loading documents!
>>>>> From File
>>>>> c:/AOO/sources/firsttasks/main/sfx2/source/doc/objmisc.cxx at
>>>>> Line 1444
>>>>> Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump)
>>>>>
>>>>> Click No, the wizard starts.
>>>>>
>>>>> May be the debug allowed switch was set and they created a debug
>>>>> version
>>>>> of AOO.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Zoltan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't get a debug output. Just a message box that says that the
>>>> selected JRE is defective and I should choose another one.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Olaf
>>>>
>>> May be we use different OS, I run under Windows 7.
>>> Regards,
>>> Zoltan
>>>
>>
>> I'm using this Office
>> http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1229535/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_de.exe
>> on WinXP - SP3.
>>
>> Regards,Ok, without an official AOO build QA work is nonsense. It makes no sense to jumpp from developer playground A to developer build b to c to see if something is fixed.
>> Olaf
>>
> I'm using
> http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1229535/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>
>
> Regards,
> Zoltan
>
Ok, I see.
Without an official AOO build QA work is nonsense. It makes no sense to
jump from developer playground A to developer build b to c to see if
something is fixed or not.
Regars,
Olaf
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Reizinger Zoltán <zr...@hdsnet.hu>.
2012.01.13. 17:21 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:
> Am 13.01.2012 17:18, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán:
>> 2012.01.13. 17:06 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:
>>> Am 13.01.2012 16:55, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán:
>>>> 2012.01.13. 16:43 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:
>>>>> Am 13.01.2012 16:21, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán:
>>>>>> 2012.01.13. 14:30 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:
>>>>>>> Am 12.01.2012 03:35, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the fix. Could you set up the issue status?
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> IIRC I resolved as fixed only 2 issues I fixed in order to test
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>> bugzilla instancia was keeping my can-confirm privileges.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now I'm uncertain about what to do in these cases. In
>>>>>>>> OpenOffice.org
>>>>>>>> times, the developer who fixed the issue didn't resolve it as
>>>>>>>> fixed.
>>>>>>>> Someone else had to do the QA in order to confirm the fix and
>>>>>>>> change the
>>>>>>>> issue status.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm not sure what the new rules are, so I will wait to resolve
>>>>>>>> this as
>>>>>>>> fixed until someone can confirm it is actually fixed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Due to issue 118352 I've made some tests with AOO and Java 7.
>>>>>>> Java 7 is detected now by AOO but AOO doesn't support it (see issue
>>>>>>> 118352).
>>>>>>> So my conclusion is not to detect it if it's not supported.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Olaf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Try orw's build it works with java 1.7. :
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~orw/
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Zoltan
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It's the same with the builds of Olive: Java 7 has been detected but
>>>>> the Wizard doesn't work.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Olaf
>>>>>
>>>> It shows a debug messeage:
>>>>
>>>> Debug Output
>>>> ---------------------------
>>>> Error: SfxHTMLParser::SfxHTMLParser: Wo kommt der ZS her?
>>>> From File
>>>> c:/AOO/sources/firsttasks/main/sfx2/source/bastyp/sfxhtml.cxx
>>>> at Line 79
>>>> Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump)
>>>>
>>>> Click no, then second debug error:
>>>> ---------------------------
>>>> Debug Output
>>>> ---------------------------
>>>> Error: Don't close the medium when loading documents!
>>>> From File
>>>> c:/AOO/sources/firsttasks/main/sfx2/source/doc/objmisc.cxx at
>>>> Line 1444
>>>> Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump)
>>>>
>>>> Click No, the wizard starts.
>>>>
>>>> May be the debug allowed switch was set and they created a debug
>>>> version
>>>> of AOO.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Zoltan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't get a debug output. Just a message box that says that the
>>> selected JRE is defective and I should choose another one.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Olaf
>>>
>> May be we use different OS, I run under Windows 7.
>> Regards,
>> Zoltan
>>
>
> I'm using this Office
> http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1229535/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_de.exe
> on WinXP - SP3.
>
> Regards,
> Olaf
>
I'm using
http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1229535/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
Regards,
Zoltan
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by "O.Felka" <ol...@gmx.de>.
Am 13.01.2012 17:18, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán:
> 2012.01.13. 17:06 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:
>> Am 13.01.2012 16:55, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán:
>>> 2012.01.13. 16:43 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:
>>>> Am 13.01.2012 16:21, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán:
>>>>> 2012.01.13. 14:30 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:
>>>>>> Am 12.01.2012 03:35, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for the fix. Could you set up the issue status?
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IIRC I resolved as fixed only 2 issues I fixed in order to test the
>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>> bugzilla instancia was keeping my can-confirm privileges.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now I'm uncertain about what to do in these cases. In OpenOffice.org
>>>>>>> times, the developer who fixed the issue didn't resolve it as fixed.
>>>>>>> Someone else had to do the QA in order to confirm the fix and
>>>>>>> change the
>>>>>>> issue status.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not sure what the new rules are, so I will wait to resolve
>>>>>>> this as
>>>>>>> fixed until someone can confirm it is actually fixed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Due to issue 118352 I've made some tests with AOO and Java 7.
>>>>>> Java 7 is detected now by AOO but AOO doesn't support it (see issue
>>>>>> 118352).
>>>>>> So my conclusion is not to detect it if it's not supported.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Olaf
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Try orw's build it works with java 1.7. :
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~orw/
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Zoltan
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's the same with the builds of Olive: Java 7 has been detected but
>>>> the Wizard doesn't work.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Olaf
>>>>
>>> It shows a debug messeage:
>>>
>>> Debug Output
>>> ---------------------------
>>> Error: SfxHTMLParser::SfxHTMLParser: Wo kommt der ZS her?
>>> From File c:/AOO/sources/firsttasks/main/sfx2/source/bastyp/sfxhtml.cxx
>>> at Line 79
>>> Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump)
>>>
>>> Click no, then second debug error:
>>> ---------------------------
>>> Debug Output
>>> ---------------------------
>>> Error: Don't close the medium when loading documents!
>>> From File c:/AOO/sources/firsttasks/main/sfx2/source/doc/objmisc.cxx at
>>> Line 1444
>>> Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump)
>>>
>>> Click No, the wizard starts.
>>>
>>> May be the debug allowed switch was set and they created a debug version
>>> of AOO.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Zoltan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I don't get a debug output. Just a message box that says that the
>> selected JRE is defective and I should choose another one.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Olaf
>>
> May be we use different OS, I run under Windows 7.
> Regards,
> Zoltan
>
I'm using this Office
http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1229535/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_de.exe
on WinXP - SP3.
Regards,
Olaf
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Reizinger Zoltán <zr...@hdsnet.hu>.
2012.01.13. 17:06 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:
> Am 13.01.2012 16:55, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán:
>> 2012.01.13. 16:43 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:
>>> Am 13.01.2012 16:21, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán:
>>>> 2012.01.13. 14:30 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:
>>>>> Am 12.01.2012 03:35, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for the fix. Could you set up the issue status?
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IIRC I resolved as fixed only 2 issues I fixed in order to test the
>>>>>> new
>>>>>> bugzilla instancia was keeping my can-confirm privileges.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now I'm uncertain about what to do in these cases. In OpenOffice.org
>>>>>> times, the developer who fixed the issue didn't resolve it as fixed.
>>>>>> Someone else had to do the QA in order to confirm the fix and
>>>>>> change the
>>>>>> issue status.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure what the new rules are, so I will wait to resolve
>>>>>> this as
>>>>>> fixed until someone can confirm it is actually fixed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Due to issue 118352 I've made some tests with AOO and Java 7.
>>>>> Java 7 is detected now by AOO but AOO doesn't support it (see issue
>>>>> 118352).
>>>>> So my conclusion is not to detect it if it's not supported.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Olaf
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Try orw's build it works with java 1.7. :
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~orw/
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Zoltan
>>>>
>>>
>>> It's the same with the builds of Olive: Java 7 has been detected but
>>> the Wizard doesn't work.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Olaf
>>>
>> It shows a debug messeage:
>>
>> Debug Output
>> ---------------------------
>> Error: SfxHTMLParser::SfxHTMLParser: Wo kommt der ZS her?
>> From File c:/AOO/sources/firsttasks/main/sfx2/source/bastyp/sfxhtml.cxx
>> at Line 79
>> Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump)
>>
>> Click no, then second debug error:
>> ---------------------------
>> Debug Output
>> ---------------------------
>> Error: Don't close the medium when loading documents!
>> From File c:/AOO/sources/firsttasks/main/sfx2/source/doc/objmisc.cxx at
>> Line 1444
>> Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump)
>>
>> Click No, the wizard starts.
>>
>> May be the debug allowed switch was set and they created a debug version
>> of AOO.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Zoltan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> I don't get a debug output. Just a message box that says that the
> selected JRE is defective and I should choose another one.
>
> Regards,
> Olaf
>
May be we use different OS, I run under Windows 7.
Regards,
Zoltan
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by "O.Felka" <ol...@gmx.de>.
Am 13.01.2012 16:55, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán:
> 2012.01.13. 16:43 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:
>> Am 13.01.2012 16:21, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán:
>>> 2012.01.13. 14:30 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:
>>>> Am 12.01.2012 03:35, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the fix. Could you set up the issue status?
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352
>>>>>
>>>>> IIRC I resolved as fixed only 2 issues I fixed in order to test the
>>>>> new
>>>>> bugzilla instancia was keeping my can-confirm privileges.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now I'm uncertain about what to do in these cases. In OpenOffice.org
>>>>> times, the developer who fixed the issue didn't resolve it as fixed.
>>>>> Someone else had to do the QA in order to confirm the fix and
>>>>> change the
>>>>> issue status.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure what the new rules are, so I will wait to resolve this as
>>>>> fixed until someone can confirm it is actually fixed.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Due to issue 118352 I've made some tests with AOO and Java 7.
>>>> Java 7 is detected now by AOO but AOO doesn't support it (see issue
>>>> 118352).
>>>> So my conclusion is not to detect it if it's not supported.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Olaf
>>>>
>>>
>>> Try orw's build it works with java 1.7. : http://people.apache.org/~orw/
>>> Regards,
>>> Zoltan
>>>
>>
>> It's the same with the builds of Olive: Java 7 has been detected but
>> the Wizard doesn't work.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Olaf
>>
> It shows a debug messeage:
>
> Debug Output
> ---------------------------
> Error: SfxHTMLParser::SfxHTMLParser: Wo kommt der ZS her?
> From File c:/AOO/sources/firsttasks/main/sfx2/source/bastyp/sfxhtml.cxx
> at Line 79
> Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump)
>
> Click no, then second debug error:
> ---------------------------
> Debug Output
> ---------------------------
> Error: Don't close the medium when loading documents!
> From File c:/AOO/sources/firsttasks/main/sfx2/source/doc/objmisc.cxx at
> Line 1444
> Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump)
>
> Click No, the wizard starts.
>
> May be the debug allowed switch was set and they created a debug version
> of AOO.
>
> Regards,
> Zoltan
>
>
>
>
>
I don't get a debug output. Just a message box that says that the
selected JRE is defective and I should choose another one.
Regards,
Olaf
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Reizinger Zoltán <zr...@hdsnet.hu>.
2012.01.13. 16:43 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:
> Am 13.01.2012 16:21, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán:
>> 2012.01.13. 14:30 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:
>>> Am 12.01.2012 03:35, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the fix. Could you set up the issue status?
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352
>>>>
>>>> IIRC I resolved as fixed only 2 issues I fixed in order to test the
>>>> new
>>>> bugzilla instancia was keeping my can-confirm privileges.
>>>>
>>>> Now I'm uncertain about what to do in these cases. In OpenOffice.org
>>>> times, the developer who fixed the issue didn't resolve it as fixed.
>>>> Someone else had to do the QA in order to confirm the fix and
>>>> change the
>>>> issue status.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure what the new rules are, so I will wait to resolve this as
>>>> fixed until someone can confirm it is actually fixed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Due to issue 118352 I've made some tests with AOO and Java 7.
>>> Java 7 is detected now by AOO but AOO doesn't support it (see issue
>>> 118352).
>>> So my conclusion is not to detect it if it's not supported.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Olaf
>>>
>>
>> Try orw's build it works with java 1.7. : http://people.apache.org/~orw/
>> Regards,
>> Zoltan
>>
>
> It's the same with the builds of Olive: Java 7 has been detected but
> the Wizard doesn't work.
>
> Regards,
> Olaf
>
It shows a debug messeage:
Debug Output
---------------------------
Error: SfxHTMLParser::SfxHTMLParser: Wo kommt der ZS her?
From File c:/AOO/sources/firsttasks/main/sfx2/source/bastyp/sfxhtml.cxx
at Line 79
Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump)
Click no, then second debug error:
---------------------------
Debug Output
---------------------------
Error: Don't close the medium when loading documents!
From File c:/AOO/sources/firsttasks/main/sfx2/source/doc/objmisc.cxx at
Line 1444
Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump)
Click No, the wizard starts.
May be the debug allowed switch was set and they created a debug version
of AOO.
Regards,
Zoltan
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by "O.Felka" <ol...@gmx.de>.
Am 13.01.2012 16:21, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán:
> 2012.01.13. 14:30 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:
>> Am 12.01.2012 03:35, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
>>
>>>> Thanks for the fix. Could you set up the issue status?
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352
>>>
>>> IIRC I resolved as fixed only 2 issues I fixed in order to test the new
>>> bugzilla instancia was keeping my can-confirm privileges.
>>>
>>> Now I'm uncertain about what to do in these cases. In OpenOffice.org
>>> times, the developer who fixed the issue didn't resolve it as fixed.
>>> Someone else had to do the QA in order to confirm the fix and change the
>>> issue status.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure what the new rules are, so I will wait to resolve this as
>>> fixed until someone can confirm it is actually fixed.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>
>> Due to issue 118352 I've made some tests with AOO and Java 7.
>> Java 7 is detected now by AOO but AOO doesn't support it (see issue
>> 118352).
>> So my conclusion is not to detect it if it's not supported.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Olaf
>>
>
> Try orw's build it works with java 1.7. : http://people.apache.org/~orw/
> Regards,
> Zoltan
>
It's the same with the builds of Olive: Java 7 has been detected but the
Wizard doesn't work.
Regards,
Olaf
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Reizinger Zoltán <zr...@hdsnet.hu>.
2012.01.13. 14:30 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:
> Am 12.01.2012 03:35, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
>
>>> Thanks for the fix. Could you set up the issue status?
>>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352
>>
>> IIRC I resolved as fixed only 2 issues I fixed in order to test the new
>> bugzilla instancia was keeping my can-confirm privileges.
>>
>> Now I'm uncertain about what to do in these cases. In OpenOffice.org
>> times, the developer who fixed the issue didn't resolve it as fixed.
>> Someone else had to do the QA in order to confirm the fix and change the
>> issue status.
>>
>> I'm not sure what the new rules are, so I will wait to resolve this as
>> fixed until someone can confirm it is actually fixed.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>
> Due to issue 118352 I've made some tests with AOO and Java 7.
> Java 7 is detected now by AOO but AOO doesn't support it (see issue
> 118352).
> So my conclusion is not to detect it if it's not supported.
>
> Regards,
> Olaf
>
Try orw's build it works with java 1.7. : http://people.apache.org/~orw/
Regards,
Zoltan
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by "O.Felka" <ol...@gmx.de>.
Am 12.01.2012 03:35, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
>> Thanks for the fix. Could you set up the issue status?
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352
>
> IIRC I resolved as fixed only 2 issues I fixed in order to test the new
> bugzilla instancia was keeping my can-confirm privileges.
>
> Now I'm uncertain about what to do in these cases. In OpenOffice.org
> times, the developer who fixed the issue didn't resolve it as fixed.
> Someone else had to do the QA in order to confirm the fix and change the
> issue status.
>
> I'm not sure what the new rules are, so I will wait to resolve this as
> fixed until someone can confirm it is actually fixed.
>
>
> Regards
Due to issue 118352 I've made some tests with AOO and Java 7.
Java 7 is detected now by AOO but AOO doesn't support it (see issue 118352).
So my conclusion is not to detect it if it's not supported.
Regards,
Olaf
RE: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by "Dennis E. Hamilton" <de...@acm.org>.
+1
There is a similar situation with some JIRA systems that I work on. VERIFIED is a nice condition. My understanding is that RESOLVED means that there is a resolution, with FIXED meaning it has been applied, with VERIFIED needed to be satisfied that the issue can be closed. There is still the case of whether it is verified in the build of a release candidate, and that takes a little more to differentiate.
- Dennis
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pescetti@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2012 14:38
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
On 13/01/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> Wasn't the cycle something like the following?
>> - Developer thinks the bug is fixed and marks issue as RESOLVED FIXED.
>> - QA engineer sets to VERIFIED, then to CLOSED. ...
> The value of having a QA engineer test a bug fix is they also "test
> around" the fix, to make sure related areas are not broken. If we
> want CRT, then maybe it is a good thing if the person doing the review
> is not the same person who did the commit?
Sure, but the review (by someone else than the developer) would be the
step from RESOLVED FIXED to VERIFIED. When Ariel fixes something, the
issue status should change to something different than STARTED (i.e., to
RESOLVED FIXED), otherwise there will be no way for QA volunteers to
find the "RESOLVED FIXED" issues and verify that they have actually been
fixed properly. At least this was my understanding of the VERIFIED
status in Bugzilla.
Regards,
Andrea.
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Andrea Pescetti <pe...@apache.org>.
On 13/01/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> Wasn't the cycle something like the following?
>> - Developer thinks the bug is fixed and marks issue as RESOLVED FIXED.
>> - QA engineer sets to VERIFIED, then to CLOSED. ...
> The value of having a QA engineer test a bug fix is they also "test
> around" the fix, to make sure related areas are not broken. If we
> want CRT, then maybe it is a good thing if the person doing the review
> is not the same person who did the commit?
Sure, but the review (by someone else than the developer) would be the
step from RESOLVED FIXED to VERIFIED. When Ariel fixes something, the
issue status should change to something different than STARTED (i.e., to
RESOLVED FIXED), otherwise there will be no way for QA volunteers to
find the "RESOLVED FIXED" issues and verify that they have actually been
fixed properly. At least this was my understanding of the VERIFIED
status in Bugzilla.
Regards,
Andrea.
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pe...@apache.org> wrote:
> Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>>
>> Now I'm uncertain about what to do in these cases. In OpenOffice.org
>> times, the developer who fixed the issue didn't resolve it as fixed.
>> Someone else had to do the QA in order to confirm the fix and change the
>> issue status.
>
>
> Wasn't the cycle something like the following?
> - Developer thinks the bug is fixed and marks issue as RESOLVED FIXED.
> - QA engineer sets to VERIFIED, then to CLOSED.
>
> The workflow you describe seems overly complex, but indeed you may well be
> right: it wouldn't be the only overly complex procedure in the old
> OpenOffice.org...
>
The value of having a QA engineer test a bug fix is they also "test
around" the fix, to make sure related areas are not broken. If we
want CRT, then maybe it is a good thing if the person doing the review
is not the same person who did the commit?
>
>> I'm not sure what the new rules are, so I will wait to resolve this as
>> fixed until someone can confirm it is actually fixed.
>
>
> So the VERIFIED and CLOSED status would be for further verification? Or
> maybe for the moment when the fix can be independently verified in a
> developer snapshot? Leaving a resolved issue as STARTED seems like a
> suboptimal workflow.
>
> Regards,
> Andrea.
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Andrea Pescetti <pe...@apache.org>.
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> Now I'm uncertain about what to do in these cases. In OpenOffice.org
> times, the developer who fixed the issue didn't resolve it as fixed.
> Someone else had to do the QA in order to confirm the fix and change the
> issue status.
Wasn't the cycle something like the following?
- Developer thinks the bug is fixed and marks issue as RESOLVED FIXED.
- QA engineer sets to VERIFIED, then to CLOSED.
The workflow you describe seems overly complex, but indeed you may well
be right: it wouldn't be the only overly complex procedure in the old
OpenOffice.org...
> I'm not sure what the new rules are, so I will wait to resolve this as
> fixed until someone can confirm it is actually fixed.
So the VERIFIED and CLOSED status would be for further verification? Or
maybe for the moment when the fix can be independently verified in a
developer snapshot? Leaving a resolved issue as STARTED seems like a
suboptimal workflow.
Regards,
Andrea.
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 08:43:59PM +0100, FR web forum wrote:
>
>
> ----- Mail original -----
> De: "Ariel Constenla-Haile" <ar...@apache.org>
> À: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Envoyé: Mardi 10 Janvier 2012 17:12:39
> Objet: Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
>
> >Committed as revision 1229371
>
> Thanks for the fix. Could you set up the issue status?
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352
IIRC I resolved as fixed only 2 issues I fixed in order to test the new
bugzilla instancia was keeping my can-confirm privileges.
Now I'm uncertain about what to do in these cases. In OpenOffice.org
times, the developer who fixed the issue didn't resolve it as fixed.
Someone else had to do the QA in order to confirm the fix and change the
issue status.
I'm not sure what the new rules are, so I will wait to resolve this as
fixed until someone can confirm it is actually fixed.
Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by FR web forum <oo...@free.fr>.
----- Mail original -----
De: "Ariel Constenla-Haile" <ar...@apache.org>
À: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Envoyé: Mardi 10 Janvier 2012 17:12:39
Objet: Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
>Committed as revision 1229371
Thanks for the fix. Could you set up the issue status?
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>.
Hi *,
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 03:47:09PM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 06:01:59PM +0100, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > >> i think the problem was that the java.vendor property has changed, because
> > >> sadly "Sun Microsystems Inc." does not exist anymore.
> > >>
> > > We ran into this with the ODF Toolkit this week., The change to
> > > "Oracle Corporation" caused some obscure build errors.
> >
> > have you seen
> > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=549e54fb2f8113502743c443d6deadfe648dede1 ?
> > seems lo fixed this issue.
>
> me, I haven't seen it. LO has a different license, so AOO can not take
> its code. This leads to duplication, as we must find our own way to fix
> it. In the mean time I solved the issue, tested at least on Linux and
> WinXP.
Committed as revision 1229371
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1229371
Notice that I only committed the settings XML file for the platforms
I could build and test, Linux and Windows:
jvmfwk/distributions/OpenOfficeorg/javavendors_linux.xml
jvmfwk/distributions/OpenOfficeorg/javavendors_wnt.xml
If you are building and testing on other platform, please add the
changes to the respective file in jvmfwk/distributions/OpenOfficeorg/
and commit the changes (obviously, after building and testing it works
;) ).
Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>.
Hi Oliver,
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 06:01:59PM +0100, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> i think the problem was that the java.vendor property has changed, because
> >> sadly "Sun Microsystems Inc." does not exist anymore.
> >>
> > We ran into this with the ODF Toolkit this week., The change to
> > "Oracle Corporation" caused some obscure build errors.
>
> have you seen
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=549e54fb2f8113502743c443d6deadfe648dede1 ?
> seems lo fixed this issue.
me, I haven't seen it. LO has a different license, so AOO can not take
its code. This leads to duplication, as we must find our own way to fix
it. In the mean time I solved the issue, tested at least on Linux and
WinXP.
Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Oliver Brinzing <Ol...@gmx.de>.
Hi,
>> i think the problem was that the java.vendor property has changed, because
>> sadly "Sun Microsystems Inc." does not exist anymore.
>>
> We ran into this with the ODF Toolkit this week., The change to
> "Oracle Corporation" caused some obscure build errors.
have you seen
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=549e54fb2f8113502743c443d6deadfe648dede1 ?
seems lo fixed this issue.
Regards
Oliver
--
GnuPG key 0xCFD04A45: 8822 057F 4956 46D3 352C 1A06 4E2C AB40 CFD0 4A45
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org>.
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Michael Stahl <ms...@openoffice.org> wrote:
> On 07/01/12 18:44, drew wrote:
>> On Sat, 2012-01-07 at 12:09 -0500, Carl Marcum wrote:
>>> On 01/07/2012 07:33 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
>>>> Hi all
>>>>
>>>> Is sameone around here with Java 7? I hear that LO 3.4.x has trubble
>>>> with Java 7. So this is probabily also a problem at AOO 3.4. Can sameone
>>>> test this?
>>>
>>> I installed OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US from
>>> http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/
>
>>> When I try to add a 1.7 jre, I receive a "The folder you selected does
>>> not contain a Java runtime environment" error.
>>>
>>> I can also confirm this is the same behavior as OOo 3.3.0 I have
>>> installed by download previously.
>>
>> IIRC, the fix turned out to be an update to a string resource in the
>> code - easy hack - but that comes from reading along on a mailing list,
>> third hand information ;-/
>
> i think the problem was that the java.vendor property has changed, because
> sadly "Sun Microsystems Inc." does not exist anymore.
>
We ran into this with the ODF Toolkit this week., The change to
"Oracle Corporation" caused some obscure build errors.
It makes sense to upgrade support for Java 7, but we'll want to be
careful, and ensure that we don't break Java 6.
> now i have no idea why the heck OOo needs to know which JVM it's running
> with, but then again the C++ UNO stuff creates vtables out of whole cloth
> at runtime, so presumably the public JVM interfaces aren't good enough
> either :)
>
RE: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by "Dennis E. Hamilton" <de...@acm.org>.
That's very funny.
I've done JNI integration with the JVM interfaces and the author of the headers did a beautiful job of staying architecture independent while providing binary-compatible COM interfaces for the dynamic bindings. In particular, there is a clean workaround of the differences in C++ compiler vtable approaches so that binary compatibility is preserved (and for C Language too).
I don't know if that also works on non-x86 platforms though, including x64, so what is done in C++ UNO might be necessary to avoid problems on different architectures and implementations of C/C++.
Although I don't expect it to be useful for AOO, I have my eye on adaptations of the JVM interface header technique for making portable C/C++ use of COM binary interfaces in some other projects of mine.
- Dennis
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Stahl [mailto:mst@openoffice.org]
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2012 07:05
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
[ ... ]
now i have no idea why the heck OOo needs to know which JVM it's running
with, but then again the C++ UNO stuff creates vtables out of whole cloth
at runtime, so presumably the public JVM interfaces aren't good enough
either :)
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Michael Stahl <ms...@openoffice.org>.
On 07/01/12 18:44, drew wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-01-07 at 12:09 -0500, Carl Marcum wrote:
>> On 01/07/2012 07:33 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> Is sameone around here with Java 7? I hear that LO 3.4.x has trubble
>>> with Java 7. So this is probabily also a problem at AOO 3.4. Can sameone
>>> test this?
>>
>> I installed OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US from
>> http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/
>> When I try to add a 1.7 jre, I receive a "The folder you selected does
>> not contain a Java runtime environment" error.
>>
>> I can also confirm this is the same behavior as OOo 3.3.0 I have
>> installed by download previously.
>
> IIRC, the fix turned out to be an update to a string resource in the
> code - easy hack - but that comes from reading along on a mailing list,
> third hand information ;-/
i think the problem was that the java.vendor property has changed, because
sadly "Sun Microsystems Inc." does not exist anymore.
now i have no idea why the heck OOo needs to know which JVM it's running
with, but then again the C++ UNO stuff creates vtables out of whole cloth
at runtime, so presumably the public JVM interfaces aren't good enough
either :)
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by drew <dr...@baseanswers.com>.
On Sat, 2012-01-07 at 12:09 -0500, Carl Marcum wrote:
> Raphael,
>
> On 01/07/2012 07:33 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > Is sameone around here with Java 7? I hear that LO 3.4.x has trubble
> > with Java 7. So this is probabily also a problem at AOO 3.4. Can sameone
> > test this?
> >
> > Greetings Raphael
>
> I installed OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US from
> http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/
>
> OS is Fedora 16 x86_64
> My bash_profile has:
> JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.1.x86_64
>
> My system would normally run java 7:
> > java -version
> java version "1.7.0_b147-icedtea"
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (fedora-2.0.3.fc16-x86_64)
> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 21.0-b17, mixed mode)
>
> The AOO 3.4 java options dialog only displays the 1.6 versions which are
> installed.
>
> When I try to add a 1.7 jre, I receive a "The folder you selected does
> not contain a Java runtime environment" error.
>
> I can also confirm this is the same behavior as OOo 3.3.0 I have
> installed by download previously.
>
> If can be of further help, please let me know.
>
> Best regards,
> Carl
>
Beware third hand information!!!!
IIRC, the fix turned out to be an update to a string resource in the
code - easy hack - but that comes from reading along on a mailing list,
third hand information ;-/
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Carl Marcum <cm...@apache.org>.
Raphael,
On 01/07/2012 07:33 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Is sameone around here with Java 7? I hear that LO 3.4.x has trubble
> with Java 7. So this is probabily also a problem at AOO 3.4. Can sameone
> test this?
>
> Greetings Raphael
I installed OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US from
http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/
OS is Fedora 16 x86_64
My bash_profile has:
JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.1.x86_64
My system would normally run java 7:
> java -version
java version "1.7.0_b147-icedtea"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (fedora-2.0.3.fc16-x86_64)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 21.0-b17, mixed mode)
The AOO 3.4 java options dialog only displays the 1.6 versions which are
installed.
When I try to add a 1.7 jre, I receive a "The folder you selected does
not contain a Java runtime environment" error.
I can also confirm this is the same behavior as OOo 3.3.0 I have
installed by download previously.
If can be of further help, please let me know.
Best regards,
Carl
R: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Posted by Pedro Giffuni <pf...@apache.org>.
TBH;
Some of the stuff that we carry (Apache commons, lucene)
is very outdated, is based on Java 1.4 and is known to
give trouble with newer versions of Java.
Some of it is rather easy to update but I am busy with
other things at this time.
regards,
Pedro.
--- Sab 7/1/12, Raphael Bircher <r....@gmx.ch> ha scritto:
> Data: Sabato 7 gennaio 2012, 07:33
> Hi all
>
> Is sameone around here with Java 7? I hear that LO 3.4.x
> has trubble with Java 7. So this is probabily also a problem
> at AOO 3.4. Can sameone test this?
>
> Greetings Raphael
> -- My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/
>