You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@continuum.apache.org by Bjørn T Johansen <bt...@asp-as.no> on 2008/01/14 16:47:48 UTC
Continuum 1.1. and PostgreSQL?
Is this a fine match? Or should one use a different database?
--
Regards
Bjørn T Johansen
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone wrote:
"I understand that if you play a Windows CD backwards you hear strange Satanic messages"
To which someone replied:
"It's even worse than that; play it forwards and it installs Windows"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Continuum 1.1. and PostgreSQL?
Posted by Bjørn T Johansen <bt...@asp-as.no>.
Oki, thx... PostgreSQL it is... :)
BTJ
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:15:23 -0600
"Jesse McConnell" <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
> a lot of the development has been done on postgres fwiw
>
> and I worked with a production instance on postgres for quite some time as
> well
>
> On Jan 14, 2008 10:00 AM, Stephane Nicoll <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Yep. Our instance is running on postgresql and we have no problem so far.
> >
> > On 1/14/08, Bjørn T Johansen <bt...@asp-as.no> wrote:
> > > Is this a fine match? Or should one use a different database?
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Bjørn T Johansen
> > >
> > >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Someone wrote:
> > > "I understand that if you play a Windows CD backwards you hear strange
> > Satanic messages"
> > > To which someone replied:
> > > "It's even worse than that; play it forwards and it installs Windows"
> > >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build one,
> > you suck" -- S.Yegge
> >
>
>
>
Re: Continuum 1.1. and PostgreSQL?
Posted by Jesse McConnell <je...@gmail.com>.
a lot of the development has been done on postgres fwiw
and I worked with a production instance on postgres for quite some time as
well
On Jan 14, 2008 10:00 AM, Stephane Nicoll <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yep. Our instance is running on postgresql and we have no problem so far.
>
> On 1/14/08, Bjørn T Johansen <bt...@asp-as.no> wrote:
> > Is this a fine match? Or should one use a different database?
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Bjørn T Johansen
> >
> >
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Someone wrote:
> > "I understand that if you play a Windows CD backwards you hear strange
> Satanic messages"
> > To which someone replied:
> > "It's even worse than that; play it forwards and it installs Windows"
> >
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
>
> --
> Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build one,
> you suck" -- S.Yegge
>
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com
Re: Continuum 1.1. and PostgreSQL?
Posted by Stephane Nicoll <st...@gmail.com>.
Yep. Our instance is running on postgresql and we have no problem so far.
On 1/14/08, Bjørn T Johansen <bt...@asp-as.no> wrote:
> Is this a fine match? Or should one use a different database?
>
>
> --
>
> Regards
>
> Bjørn T Johansen
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Someone wrote:
> "I understand that if you play a Windows CD backwards you hear strange Satanic messages"
> To which someone replied:
> "It's even worse than that; play it forwards and it installs Windows"
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--
Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build one,
you suck" -- S.Yegge