You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by David Baron <d_...@012.net.il> on 2006/05/18 15:08:42 UTC
A lot of these going around
May 18 11:50:22 d_baron spamc[5797]: connect(AF_INET) to spamd at 127.0.0.1
failed, retrying (#1 of 3): Connection refused
Seems harmless though annoying.
Fix?
Re: A lot of these going around
Posted by David Baron <d_...@012.net.il>.
On Thursday 18 May 2006 16:36, Ronald Nsubuga wrote:
> check the retry time and what os are u running pliz and the version you are
> using for spamassasin?
>
retries less than 1 minute. Debian Sid, SA 3.1.1
Re: A lot of these going around
Posted by David Baron <d_...@012.net.il>.
>On Thursday 18 May 2006 16:36, Ronald Nsubuga wrote:
>> check the retry time and what os are u running pliz and the version you are
>> using for spamassasin?
>>
>retries less than 1 minute. Debian Sid, SA 3.1.1
Bunch of these error messages seem to happening every few (five?) hours.
Re: A lot of these going around
Posted by Ronald Nsubuga <ro...@one2net.co.ug>.
check the retry time and what os are u running pliz and the version you are
using for spamassasin?
On 5/18/06, David Baron <d_...@012.net.il> wrote:
>
> May 18 11:50:22 d_baron spamc[5797]: connect(AF_INET) to spamd at
> 127.0.0.1
> failed, retrying (#1 of 3): Connection refused
>
> Seems harmless though annoying.
> Fix?
>
--
Ronald Nsubuga
Network Engineer
One2net Ltd
---------
A Network of People & Technology
-----------------
& Ronald says,
Everything can be achieved as long you can do what it takes to achieve it!
" The More Things Change The More Things Stay The Same "
----------------------------------------------
Re: A lot of these going around
Posted by David Baron <d_...@012.net.il>.
On Thursday 18 May 2006 22:50, Matt Kettler wrote:
> David Baron wrote:
> > On Thursday 18 May 2006 20:40, Matt Kettler wrote:
> >> David Baron wrote:
> >>> May 18 11:50:22 d_baron spamc[5797]: connect(AF_INET) to spamd at
> >>> 127.0.0.1 failed, retrying (#1 of 3): Connection refused
> >>>
> >>> Seems harmless though annoying.
> >>> Fix?
> >>
> >> Is spamd running?
> >
> > Of course.
>
> Is spamd configured to allow connections from 127.0.0.1?
>
> (ie: what are you passing after the -A parameter to spamd?)
There is no -A parameter used. 127.0.0.1 is "loopback". Do I need it (and why
was it not placed on installation)?
RE: A lot of these going around
Posted by Sietse van Zanen <si...@wizdom.nu>.
Or maybe some "rejecting connection due to high load" messages in je system logs?
________________________________
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:mkettler@evi-inc.com]
Sent: Thu 18-May-06 21:50
To: David Baron
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: A lot of these going around
David Baron wrote:
> On Thursday 18 May 2006 20:40, Matt Kettler wrote:
>> David Baron wrote:
>>> May 18 11:50:22 d_baron spamc[5797]: connect(AF_INET) to spamd at
>>> 127.0.0.1 failed, retrying (#1 of 3): Connection refused
>>>
>>> Seems harmless though annoying.
>>> Fix?
>> Is spamd running?
>
> Of course.
>
Is spamd configured to allow connections from 127.0.0.1?
(ie: what are you passing after the -A parameter to spamd?)
Re: A lot of these going around
Posted by Matt Kettler <mk...@evi-inc.com>.
David Baron wrote:
> On Thursday 18 May 2006 20:40, Matt Kettler wrote:
>> David Baron wrote:
>>> May 18 11:50:22 d_baron spamc[5797]: connect(AF_INET) to spamd at
>>> 127.0.0.1 failed, retrying (#1 of 3): Connection refused
>>>
>>> Seems harmless though annoying.
>>> Fix?
>> Is spamd running?
>
> Of course.
>
Is spamd configured to allow connections from 127.0.0.1?
(ie: what are you passing after the -A parameter to spamd?)
Re: A lot of these going around
Posted by David Baron <d_...@012.net.il>.
On Thursday 18 May 2006 20:40, Matt Kettler wrote:
> David Baron wrote:
> > May 18 11:50:22 d_baron spamc[5797]: connect(AF_INET) to spamd at
> > 127.0.0.1 failed, retrying (#1 of 3): Connection refused
> >
> > Seems harmless though annoying.
> > Fix?
>
> Is spamd running?
Of course.
Re: A lot of these going around
Posted by Matt Kettler <mk...@evi-inc.com>.
David Baron wrote:
> May 18 11:50:22 d_baron spamc[5797]: connect(AF_INET) to spamd at 127.0.0.1
> failed, retrying (#1 of 3): Connection refused
>
> Seems harmless though annoying.
> Fix?
Is spamd running?