You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Doron Cohen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/06/05 23:53:26 UTC
[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-808) bufferDeleteTerm in IndexWriter might
flush prematurely
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Doron Cohen resolved LUCENE-808.
--------------------------------
Resolution: Invalid
Lucene Fields: [Patch Available] (was: [New, Patch Available])
No one else but me consider this behavior a problem, so close it.
> bufferDeleteTerm in IndexWriter might flush prematurely
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-808
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-808
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Index
> Affects Versions: 2.1
> Reporter: Doron Cohen
> Assignee: Doron Cohen
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: successive_bufferDeleteTerm.patch
>
>
> Successive calls to remove-by-the-same-term would increment numBufferedDeleteTerms
> although all but the first are no op if no docs were added in between. Hence deletes would
> be flushed too soon.
> It is a minor problem, should be rare, but it seems cleaner to fix this.
> Attached patch also fixes TestIndexWriterDelete.testNonRAMDelete() which somehow
> relied on this behavior. All tests pass.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org