You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to xmlrpc-auto@ws.apache.org by "Andreas Sahlbach (JIRA)" <xm...@ws.apache.org> on 2008/01/16 16:58:34 UTC

[jira] Updated: (XMLRPC-148) Streaming mode not working as documented

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLRPC-148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Andreas Sahlbach updated XMLRPC-148:
------------------------------------

    Attachment: streaming.patch

Please find attached the patch regarding the new streaming mode. The biggest difference to the old behavior is, that the client is not able to stream anymore and that the information, that the server should answer in streaming mode, now is part of the document (and not the body). Therefore contentLengthOptional=true needs enabledForExtensions=true. 

I had to change several test cases to reflect these new facts and you might want to review the test suite, because it was designed with the different previous contentLengthOptional implementation in mind. And of course you should review my documentation changes. :-)

The server and client works fine here on our development server/client. I will deploy it the next days/weeks to the different stages but I expect no problems.

The patch is based on http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/xmlrpc/trunk@610730

> Streaming mode not working as documented
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: XMLRPC-148
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLRPC-148
>             Project: XML-RPC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.1
>         Environment: Gentoo / Sun JDK 1.6
>            Reporter: Andreas Sahlbach
>         Attachments: streaming.patch, xmlrpc.patch
>
>
> Here is my mail posted in the developer mailing list describing the issue(s):
> Hi xmlrpc-gurus!
> I am trying to migrate my projects from xmlrpc 2.0 to xmlrpc 3.1. I need to migrate one of the clients and the server, so I am very interested, that this part of the documentation is true:
> > If streaming mode is disabled, then the server will always behave like a standard XML-RPC server. Otherwise, the server will verify, whether the client sends a content-length header. If so, then the server assumes that
> > the client is able to accept a missing content-length header in the response as well. Otherwise, the server will still disable streaming for this particular requests. In other words, traditional clients will still receive a traditional > response and one server can serve both data types.
> Unfortunately during verification of this I encountered two problems:
> 1) client: I am using the sun classes on a linux system. It looks like that it doesn't actually matters if I set contentLengthOptional and enabledForExtensions to tue or false. The request _always_ contains a content-length header. I debugged it but couldn't find place, where this header is added. I found the place in the client where the configuration was correctly read out and where the client was skipping the part to add this header. But nevertheless my request contains a content-length header at the end (I am using wireshark to sniff the network traffic). In the case I set the two configurations to true, the content-length header is always the last header in the header section. Can it be, that java is adding the content-length header by itself? If this is the case then using the content-length header for detection if the server should answer in streaming mode or not is not working!
> 2) server: I actually can't find the part in the sources where the server is honoring the content-length header in the request. It looks like the server is acting in streaming mode if I set both options to true and is not acting in streaming-mode, if I set both options to false. At least that is wireshark telling me. Could you give me a pointer to the code part that is doing the magic as stated in the documentation?
> I  don't want to nit-pick, but not becoming incompatible is essential for my service. Within the enterprise of my customer a number of clients are not under my control and I am in deep shit if they stop working :)
> Thanks for your time guys!

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.