You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@camel.apache.org by "Radoslaw Szymanek (Commented) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/04/13 14:25:16 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (CAMEL-5167) onException policy within global context lost when error handler redefined within route context.

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13253317#comment-13253317 ] 

Radoslaw Szymanek commented on CAMEL-5167:
------------------------------------------

Hi, 

Sorry for being the pain in the ass, however your test case is not about the issue I wanted to raise. 

Try changing your route in test into something like this : 

{code}
                    from("direct:start")

                            .process(new Processor() {

                                private int counter;

                                public void process(Exchange exchange) throws Exception {

                                    if (counter++ < 2) {

                                        throw new IllegalArgumentException("Damn");

                                    }

                                    exchange.getIn().setBody("Bye World");

                                }

                            })

                            .errorHandler(defaultErrorHandler().maximumRedeliveries(2).redeliveryDelay(0))

                            .to("log:result")

                            .to("mock:result");

{code}

If you move errorHandler part after processor then your test case if failing. 

I am reopening it only because you did not understand the mistake the user may make, which should be warned about. 
                
> onException policy within global context lost when error handler redefined within route context.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-5167
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5167
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.9.1
>            Reporter: Radoslaw Szymanek
>            Assignee: Claus Ibsen
>             Fix For: 2.10.0
>
>
> This may as well be Camel feature (limitation of Java DSL), but I found no indications/warning that this is a feature in Camel book or web documentation. 
> The route is somewhat ill defined as local errorHandler should be placed before bean part, but maybe for those types of mistakes 
> it should not have this nasty side effects of loosing global onException policy, but at least complain during route creation (?).  
> Moreover, the route works properly if I remove global error handler, so it is rather nasty effect if route definition correctness depends on the existence of the global error handler definition.
> If I move local errorHandler before bean part then the my test passes as the onException policy is triggered and works properly. 
> As soon as I redefine the error handler within a route the onException policy is no longer applicable for the route and the route propagates the exception back to the caller. 
> {code}
>         errorHandler(defaultErrorHandler().maximumRedeliveries(1));
>         onException(NullPointerException.class).setOnRedelivery(new NullRegistrationDateProcessor());
>         from("direct:toPropertyFile").routeId("registrationEntryToPropertyFile")
>                 .setHeader(Exchange.FILE_NAME, simple("${body.firstname}.${body.surname}"))
>                 .bean(RegistrationToPropertiesBean.class, "convert")
>      // Potential bug in Camel, if the same error handler like global is turned on then onException defined in global context will not be picked up.
>               .errorHandler(defaultErrorHandler().maximumRedeliveries(1))
>      // the code above is working if no default handler was created for a global context.
>               .to("file://" + outFolder);
> {code}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira