You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@openoffice.apache.org by Dennis Hamilton <or...@gmail.com> on 2012/04/01 02:24:43 UTC

Moderation Rejection Experiment

This message is intended to be rejected.

Please add a

%%%
reason
%%%

message for the rejection.

We can then see what happens with these.

 - Dennis

Re: Moderation Rejection Experiment

Posted by Terry <te...@yahoo.com.au>.

Duly received.

>________________________________
> From: Dennis Hamilton <or...@gmail.com>
>To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org 
>Sent: Sunday, 1 April 2012 10:24 AM
>Subject: Moderation Rejection Experiment
> 
>This message is intended to be rejected.
>
>Please add a
>
>%%%
>reason
>%%%
>
>message for the rejection.
>
>We can then see what happens with these.
>
>- Dennis
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ooo-users-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ooo-users-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: Moderation Rejection Experiment

Posted by Carol DeLaurier <wa...@aol.com>.

> %%%
> reason
> %%%
On Mar 31, 2012, at 9:09 PM, Stacie Jones wrote:

>> %%%
>> reason
>> %%%

Re: Moderation Rejection Experiment

Posted by David Rivers <dr...@ihug.co.nz>.

Stacie Jones wrote:
> There's at least 3 of us that nothing better to do on Saturday night!
>
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Rob Weir<ro...@apache.org>  wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Stacie Jones<queenigraine@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>> I think I know why you're sending this? It's because of that whole,
>>> non-subscribers posting to the list thing. correct. But even so, I really
>>> wasn't confused until today.
>>>
>>>
>> Sorry, that was my fault.   I was supposed to reject Dennis's post, as part
>> of an experiment.
>>
>> "Moderators gone wild" tonight.
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Dennis Hamilton<or...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> This message is intended to be rejected.
>>>>
>>>> Please add a
>>>>
>>>> %%%
>>>> reason
>>>> %%%
>>>>
>>>> message for the rejection.
>>>>
>>>> We can then see what happens with these.
>>>>
>>>>   - Dennis
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Peace,
>>> Stacie M. Jones
>>> ~"Lokaa samastaa sukhino bhavantu,"~
>>> "May all worlds be happy."
>>>
>
>
Sunday morning here, Stacie :))

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ooo-users-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ooo-users-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: Moderation Rejection Experiment

Posted by Stacie Jones <qu...@gmail.com>.

There's at least 3 of us that nothing better to do on Saturday night!

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Stacie Jones <queenigraine@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > I think I know why you're sending this? It's because of that whole,
> > non-subscribers posting to the list thing. correct. But even so, I really
> > wasn't confused until today.
> >
> >
> Sorry, that was my fault.   I was supposed to reject Dennis's post, as part
> of an experiment.
>
> "Moderators gone wild" tonight.
>
> -Rob
>
>
>
> > On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Dennis Hamilton <or...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > This message is intended to be rejected.
> > >
> > > Please add a
> > >
> > > %%%
> > > reason
> > > %%%
> > >
> > > message for the rejection.
> > >
> > > We can then see what happens with these.
> > >
> > >  - Dennis
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Peace,
> > Stacie M. Jones
> > ~"Lokaa samastaa sukhino bhavantu,"~
> > "May all worlds be happy."
> >
>



-- 
Peace,
Stacie M. Jones
~"Lokaa samastaa sukhino bhavantu,"~
"May all worlds be happy."

Re: Moderation Rejection Experiment

Posted by Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org>.

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Stacie Jones <qu...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I think I know why you're sending this? It's because of that whole,
> non-subscribers posting to the list thing. correct. But even so, I really
> wasn't confused until today.
>
>
Sorry, that was my fault.   I was supposed to reject Dennis's post, as part
of an experiment.

"Moderators gone wild" tonight.

-Rob



> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Dennis Hamilton <or...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This message is intended to be rejected.
> >
> > Please add a
> >
> > %%%
> > reason
> > %%%
> >
> > message for the rejection.
> >
> > We can then see what happens with these.
> >
> >  - Dennis
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Peace,
> Stacie M. Jones
> ~"Lokaa samastaa sukhino bhavantu,"~
> "May all worlds be happy."
>

Re: Moderation Rejection Experiment

Posted by Stacie Jones <qu...@gmail.com>.

I think I know why you're sending this? It's because of that whole,
non-subscribers posting to the list thing. correct. But even so, I really
wasn't confused until today.

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Dennis Hamilton <or...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This message is intended to be rejected.
>
> Please add a
>
> %%%
> reason
> %%%
>
> message for the rejection.
>
> We can then see what happens with these.
>
>  - Dennis
>

-- 
Peace,
Stacie M. Jones
~"Lokaa samastaa sukhino bhavantu,"~
"May all worlds be happy."

RE: Moderation Rejection Experiment

Posted by "Dennis E. Hamilton" <de...@acm.org>.

What happened with the previous post:  The message that was intended to be rejected was accidently accept by a moderators.  Since it was written on the assumption that only moderators would see it, its appearance on the list is confusing.  Sorry about that.  

The next effort was properly rejected and the moderators now know the answer to that age-old question about a tree falling in the forest.

Here is what a rejection message looks like.  The original message was returned as an attachment (not shown).  The message at the bottom was entered by the moderator and included in the rejection the list robot sent out:

-----Original Message-----
From: ooo-users-owner@incubator.apache.org [mailto:ooo-users-owner@incubator.apache.org] 
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 18:17
To: **moderator using a non-subscribed account**
Subject: Returned post for ooo-users@incubator.apache.org

Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
ooo-users@incubator.apache.org mailing list.

I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at ooo-users-owner@incubator.apache.org.

I'm sorry, your message (enclosed) was not accepted by the moderator.
If the moderator has made any comments, they are shown below.

>>>>> -------------------- >>>>>
This message is being rejected to determine what kind of responses, if any, are received when the moderators reject a post.
<<<<< -------------------- <<<<<

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ooo-users-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ooo-users-help@incubator.apache.org

RE: Moderation Rejection Experiment

Posted by "Dennis E. Hamilton" <de...@acm.org>.

My apologies.  

The original "Moderation Rejection Experiment" message was not intended to be received by the list.  It was for an experiment in the private interactions between the list robot and the moderators.  The idea was for a moderator to reject it so the moderators could then see for themselves what the resulting rejection message from the list robot looks like.

The message leaked onto the list by a moderator actually approving it, rather than rejecting it first.

It is meaningless for users of the list to follow those instructions and to keep replying to the thread.   It might be weirdly amusing, but it has no effect other than adding noise to this list.

I apologize for the confusion.

 - Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike C. Baker [mailto:kihebard@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 01:28
To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moderation Rejection Experiment


 %%%
Suspicious Sender - Windows Live Mail dumped this into the Junk folder
 %%%

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Dennis Hamilton" <or...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 7:24 PM
To: <oo...@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Moderation Rejection Experiment

> This message is intended to be rejected.
> 
> Please add a
> 
> %%%
> reason
> %%%
> 
> message for the rejection.
> 
> We can then see what happens with these.
> 
> - Dennis
>

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ooo-users-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ooo-users-help@incubator.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ooo-users-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ooo-users-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: Moderation Rejection Experiment

Posted by "Mike C. Baker" <ki...@hotmail.com>.

 %%%
Suspicious Sender - Windows Live Mail dumped this into the Junk folder
 %%%

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Dennis Hamilton" <or...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 7:24 PM
To: <oo...@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Moderation Rejection Experiment

> This message is intended to be rejected.
> 
> Please add a
> 
> %%%
> reason
> %%%
> 
> message for the rejection.
> 
> We can then see what happens with these.
> 
> - Dennis
>

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ooo-users-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ooo-users-help@incubator.apache.org