You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by "Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot (Updated) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/01/20 08:36:40 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (DIRAPI-64) Relax LDAP filtering checks to allow trivial filters without parenthesis

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-64?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot updated DIRAPI-64:
-----------------------------------------

    Fix Version/s:     (was: 1.0.0-M9)
                   1.0.0-M10
    
> Relax LDAP filtering checks to allow trivial filters without parenthesis
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRAPI-64
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-64
>             Project: Directory Client API
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0-M8
>            Reporter: Sebastien Bahloul
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.0.0-M10
>
>
> When using a filter in either a simple search or a LDAP URL, the filter is check against a strict format which requires starting and ending with parenthesis. 
> I suggest to relax the LDAP filtering syntax to accept also search filters without any parenthesis like cn=Pierre or mail=*
> Thanks,

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Re: [jira] [Commented] (DIRAPI-64) Relax LDAP filtering checks to allow trivial filters without parenthesis

Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
On 1/23/12 11:40 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
> On 23 janv. 2012, at 11:34, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny<el...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> On 1/22/12 3:14 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>> Didn't we decide against this? Reason I ask is because the resolution here
>> says 'fixed' instead of 'will not fix' .
>> It's still open ... Are you sure you are looking at the right issue ?
>>
>> Yeah I remember having discussions on this trivial matter but I thought we threw it out: wondering why it was still open. I think the point was we don't have to do this just to save some idiot from having to type two parentheses.
> Even, if I don't agree on the subject, majority wins, I also think we should close the issue.

Let's close it.

-- 
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com


Re: [jira] [Commented] (DIRAPI-64) Relax LDAP filtering checks to allow trivial filters without parenthesis

Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>wrote:

> On 23 janv. 2012, at 11:34, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On 1/22/12 3:14 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>>
>>> Didn't we decide against this? Reason I ask is because the resolution
>>> here
>>> says 'fixed' instead of 'will not fix' .
>>>
>> It's still open ... Are you sure you are looking at the right issue ?
>
>
> Yeah I remember having discussions on this trivial matter but I thought we
> threw it out: wondering why it was still open. I think the point was we
> don't have to do this just to save some idiot from having to type two
> parentheses.
>
>
> Even, if I don't agree on the subject, majority wins, I also think we
> should close the issue.
>
>
Thanks Pierre, I no you wanted this to make it easier for users and we did
not agree. But it's very cool not to agree but everything works smoothly.

-- 
Best Regards,
-- Alex

Re: [jira] [Commented] (DIRAPI-64) Relax LDAP filtering checks to allow trivial filters without parenthesis

Posted by Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>.
On 23 janv. 2012, at 11:34, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/22/12 3:14 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> Didn't we decide against this? Reason I ask is because the resolution here
> says 'fixed' instead of 'will not fix' .
> It's still open ... Are you sure you are looking at the right issue ?
> 
> Yeah I remember having discussions on this trivial matter but I thought we threw it out: wondering why it was still open. I think the point was we don't have to do this just to save some idiot from having to type two parentheses. 

Even, if I don't agree on the subject, majority wins, I also think we should close the issue.

Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud

> -- 
> Best Regards,
> -- Alex
> 


Re: [jira] [Commented] (DIRAPI-64) Relax LDAP filtering checks to allow trivial filters without parenthesis

Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 1/22/12 3:14 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
>> Didn't we decide against this? Reason I ask is because the resolution here
>> says 'fixed' instead of 'will not fix' .
>>
> It's still open ... Are you sure you are looking at the right issue ?


Yeah I remember having discussions on this trivial matter but I thought we
threw it out: wondering why it was still open. I think the point was we
don't have to do this just to save some idiot from having to type two
parentheses.

-- 
Best Regards,
-- Alex

Re: [jira] [Commented] (DIRAPI-64) Relax LDAP filtering checks to allow trivial filters without parenthesis

Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
On 1/22/12 3:14 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> Didn't we decide against this? Reason I ask is because the resolution here
> says 'fixed' instead of 'will not fix' .
It's still open ... Are you sure you are looking at the right issue ?


-- 
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com


Re: [jira] [Commented] (DIRAPI-64) Relax LDAP filtering checks to allow trivial filters without parenthesis

Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
Didn't we decide against this? Reason I ask is because the resolution here
says 'fixed' instead of 'will not fix' .

On Friday, January 20, 2012, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot (Updated) (JIRA) <
jira@apache.org> wrote:
>
>     [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-64?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel]
>
> Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot updated DIRAPI-64:
> -----------------------------------------
>
>    Fix Version/s:     (was: 1.0.0-M9)
>                   1.0.0-M10
>
>> Relax LDAP filtering checks to allow trivial filters without parenthesis
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>                 Key: DIRAPI-64
>>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-64
>>             Project: Directory Client API
>>          Issue Type: New Feature
>>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0-M8
>>            Reporter: Sebastien Bahloul
>>            Priority: Minor
>>             Fix For: 1.0.0-M10
>>
>>
>> When using a filter in either a simple search or a LDAP URL, the filter
is check against a strict format which requires starting and ending with
parenthesis.
>> I suggest to relax the LDAP filtering syntax to accept also search
filters without any parenthesis like cn=Pierre or mail=*
>> Thanks,
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>
>
>

-- 
Best Regards,
-- Alex