Re: 2.1 trunk => ab -v 2 segfault

[Joe Orton <jo...@redhat.com>]

On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 11:27:27AM +0100, Alexander Lazic wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> i use the 2.1 tunk ab and have found 2 segfaults, it think.
> 
> the first one was easy to find:
>  in ssl_print_cert_info() the buf is 64 not BUFSIZ
>  for eg. =>X509_NAME_oneline(dn, buf, BUFSIZ);
> 
> The second one was not so easy to find because i'am not very familiar
> with the openssl-development.

Thanks for the report, there were three segfaults actually; I've fixed
them on the trunk.

> After the test i get a segfault:
> 
> gdb  /home/al/progs/http-2.1/bin/ab
> (gdb) set args -v 2 -g gnuplot_ab -sn1 -c2 https://$SERVER/

one of the segfaults was because you're using a -c value > -n, which
doesn't really make sense; I changed ab to reject that.

Regards,

joe

Re: 2.1 trunk => ab -v 2 segfault

[Sander Temme <sa...@temme.net>]

On Apr 15, 2005, at 4:25 AM, Alexander Lazic wrote:

>> one of the segfaults was because you're using a -c value > -n, which
>> doesn't really make sense; I changed ab to reject that.
>
> Ops, sorry :-(

Don't be sorry, it's still a bug. (:

S.

-- 
sander@temme.net              http://www.temme.net/sander/
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4  B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF

Re: 2.1 trunk => ab -v 2 segfault

[Alexander Lazic <al...@none.at>]

Hi,

On Fre 15.04.2005 11:54, Joe Orton wrote:
>
>Thanks for the report, there were three segfaults actually; I've fixed
>them on the trunk.

Thanks ;-)

>one of the segfaults was because you're using a -c value > -n, which
>doesn't really make sense; I changed ab to reject that.

Ops, sorry :-(

al ;-)