You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@cxf.apache.org by "Daniel H. Peger (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/03/06 08:48:32 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (CXF-7267) Member names must match bean attribute for BeanParam to work

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Daniel H. Peger updated CXF-7267:
---------------------------------
    Description: 
I just ran into this problem on my first attempt to use {{@BeanParam}} and got this exception:

{noformat}
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unresolved variables; only 0 value(s) given for 2 unique variable(s)
	at org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.impl.UriBuilderImpl.substituteVarargs(UriBuilderImpl.java:285)
	at org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.impl.UriBuilderImpl.doBuildUriParts(UriBuilderImpl.java:121)
...
{noformat}

My parameter bean looked like this:

{code}package com.recommind.common.rest;

import javax.ws.rs.PathParam;

public final class ApplicationIdentifierParameter
{

  @PathParam("applicationId")
  private String mApplicationId;

  @PathParam("projectId")
  private String mProjectId;

  public String getApplicationId()
  {
    return mApplicationId;
  }

  public void setApplicationId(String aApplicationId)
  {
    mApplicationId = aApplicationId;
  }

  public String getProjectId()
  {
    return mProjectId;
  }

  public void setProjectId(String aProjectId)
  {
    mProjectId = aProjectId;
  }
}
{code}

I debugged {{UriBuilderImpl}} and found that in {{ClientProxyImpl:514}} the to be evaluated members are identified by the names of the corresponding setters.

I think this is wrong - or at least inconvenient - as it is totally valid for a bean's internals field to have different names than the corresponding bean attribute. To my knowledge the Bean spec only requires setters and getters to match and does not care about the internal representation of the attributes.

Rather than looking at the setters ClientProxyImpl should iterate over the bean's fields, look for fields annotated with {{@PathParam}} and update the field using reflection.

  was:
I just ran into this problem on my first attempt to use {{@BeanParam}} and got this exception:

{noformat}
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unresolved variables; only 0 value(s) given for 2 unique variable(s)
	at org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.impl.UriBuilderImpl.substituteVarargs(UriBuilderImpl.java:285)
	at org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.impl.UriBuilderImpl.doBuildUriParts(UriBuilderImpl.java:121)
...
{noformat}

My parameter bean looked like this:

{code}package com.recommind.common.rest;

import javax.ws.rs.PathParam;

public final class ApplicationIdentifierParameter
{

  @PathParam(PathParameters.PATH_APPLICATION_ID)
  private String mApplicationId;

  @PathParam(PathParameters.PATH_PROJECT_ID)
  private String mProjectId;

  public String getApplicationId()
  {
    return mApplicationId;
  }

  public void setApplicationId(String aApplicationId)
  {
    mApplicationId = aApplicationId;
  }

  public String getProjectId()
  {
    return mProjectId;
  }

  public void setProjectId(String aProjectId)
  {
    mProjectId = aProjectId;
  }
}
{code}

I debugged {{UriBuilderImpl}} and found that in {{ClientProxyImpl:514}} the to be evaluated members are identified by the names of the corresponding setters.

I think this is wrong - or at least inconvenient - as it is totally valid for a bean's internals field to have different names than the corresponding bean attribute. To my knowledge the Bean spec only requires setters and getters to match and does not care about the internal representation of the attributes.

Rather than looking at the setters ClientProxyImpl should iterate over the bean's fields, look for fields annotated with {{@PathParam}} and update the field using reflection.


> Member names must match bean attribute for BeanParam to work
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-7267
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7267
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.1.4
>            Reporter: Daniel H. Peger
>            Priority: Minor
>
> I just ran into this problem on my first attempt to use {{@BeanParam}} and got this exception:
> {noformat}
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unresolved variables; only 0 value(s) given for 2 unique variable(s)
> 	at org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.impl.UriBuilderImpl.substituteVarargs(UriBuilderImpl.java:285)
> 	at org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.impl.UriBuilderImpl.doBuildUriParts(UriBuilderImpl.java:121)
> ...
> {noformat}
> My parameter bean looked like this:
> {code}package com.recommind.common.rest;
> import javax.ws.rs.PathParam;
> public final class ApplicationIdentifierParameter
> {
>   @PathParam("applicationId")
>   private String mApplicationId;
>   @PathParam("projectId")
>   private String mProjectId;
>   public String getApplicationId()
>   {
>     return mApplicationId;
>   }
>   public void setApplicationId(String aApplicationId)
>   {
>     mApplicationId = aApplicationId;
>   }
>   public String getProjectId()
>   {
>     return mProjectId;
>   }
>   public void setProjectId(String aProjectId)
>   {
>     mProjectId = aProjectId;
>   }
> }
> {code}
> I debugged {{UriBuilderImpl}} and found that in {{ClientProxyImpl:514}} the to be evaluated members are identified by the names of the corresponding setters.
> I think this is wrong - or at least inconvenient - as it is totally valid for a bean's internals field to have different names than the corresponding bean attribute. To my knowledge the Bean spec only requires setters and getters to match and does not care about the internal representation of the attributes.
> Rather than looking at the setters ClientProxyImpl should iterate over the bean's fields, look for fields annotated with {{@PathParam}} and update the field using reflection.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)