You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> on 2010/02/24 14:25:35 UTC
[Facelets] deploying "old" Facelets templates with MyFaces 2
Again...
MYFACES-2543
*snip*
If the answer to this question is "no", Facelets in JSF 2.0 is
backwards compatible with pre-JSF 2.0 Facelets and such an application
must not continue to bundle the Facelets jar file along with the
application, and must not continue to set the Facelets configuration
parameters.
*snip*
So, this is actually blocking a reasonable use-case. Please keep the
bug open ;-)
-Matthias
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [Facelets] deploying "old" Facelets templates with MyFaces 2
Posted by Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>.
Great!
2010/2/27 Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org>
> dojofaces testing is now possible on a snapshot I've built from trunk.
> Minor bugs do occur, I'll bring them in through JIRA.
>
> Cool stuff, great work, thank you.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Ganesh
>
> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>
>> that's great! The more feedback (from different lib) we get, the better
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you so much everyone for your efforts. I will instantly start
>>> testing
>>> with dojofaces and report my progres.
>>>
>>> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>>>
>>>> can you try, now ?
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Jakob Korherr <jakob.korherr@gmail.com
>>>> >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I implemented the lookup for the presence of the facelets-1.1.x
>>>>> view-handler
>>>>> in the faces-config.xml in the factory, so that the users don't have to
>>>>> explicitly set the related web.xml config parameter when they already
>>>>> said
>>>>> that they want to use facelets-1.1.x in faces-config.xml (via defining
>>>>> the
>>>>> facelets-1.1.x view-handler). Mojarra actually does exactly the same.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Jakob
>>>>>
>>>>> 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Ganesh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think dojofaces will not work until apply the patch on MYFACES-2564
>>>>>>> (look
>>>>>>> on subversion commits). This change was reverted but now we need it
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> complete the solution. Anyway we need to change it a little and maybe
>>>>>>> remove
>>>>>>> the code that checks for facelets view handler and takes into account
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> right, as I understand it users are asked/forced to get rid of that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -M
>>>>>>
>>>>>> check if it is facelets for jsf 2.0 working or not.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Leonardo Uribe
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> it should work, by now, just go svn up on trunk.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am interested in the results of testing your project.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> thx
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Currently I'm putting my effords into dojofaces, so interest is
>>>>>>>>> there,
>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>> time is scarce ... sorry.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>> Ganesh
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, I understand that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: [Facelets] deploying "old" Facelets templates with MyFaces 2
Posted by Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org>.
dojofaces testing is now possible on a snapshot I've built from trunk.
Minor bugs do occur, I'll bring them in through JIRA.
Cool stuff, great work, thank you.
Best regards,
Ganesh
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
> that's great! The more feedback (from different lib) we get, the better
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org> wrote:
>> Thank you so much everyone for your efforts. I will instantly start testing
>> with dojofaces and report my progres.
>>
>> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>>> can you try, now ?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I implemented the lookup for the presence of the facelets-1.1.x
>>>> view-handler
>>>> in the faces-config.xml in the factory, so that the users don't have to
>>>> explicitly set the related web.xml config parameter when they already
>>>> said
>>>> that they want to use facelets-1.1.x in faces-config.xml (via defining
>>>> the
>>>> facelets-1.1.x view-handler). Mojarra actually does exactly the same.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Jakob
>>>>
>>>> 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Ganesh
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think dojofaces will not work until apply the patch on MYFACES-2564
>>>>>> (look
>>>>>> on subversion commits). This change was reverted but now we need it to
>>>>>> complete the solution. Anyway we need to change it a little and maybe
>>>>>> remove
>>>>>> the code that checks for facelets view handler and takes into account
>>>>>> to
>>>>> right, as I understand it users are asked/forced to get rid of that.
>>>>>
>>>>> -M
>>>>>
>>>>>> check if it is facelets for jsf 2.0 working or not.
>>>>>
>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Leonardo Uribe
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> it should work, by now, just go svn up on trunk.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am interested in the results of testing your project.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thx
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Currently I'm putting my effords into dojofaces, so interest is
>>>>>>>> there,
>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>> time is scarce ... sorry.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> Ganesh
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>>>>>>>>> Yeah, I understand that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
Re: [Facelets] deploying "old" Facelets templates with MyFaces 2
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
that's great! The more feedback (from different lib) we get, the better
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org> wrote:
> Thank you so much everyone for your efforts. I will instantly start testing
> with dojofaces and report my progres.
>
> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>>
>> can you try, now ?
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I implemented the lookup for the presence of the facelets-1.1.x
>>> view-handler
>>> in the faces-config.xml in the factory, so that the users don't have to
>>> explicitly set the related web.xml config parameter when they already
>>> said
>>> that they want to use facelets-1.1.x in faces-config.xml (via defining
>>> the
>>> facelets-1.1.x view-handler). Mojarra actually does exactly the same.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jakob
>>>
>>> 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Ganesh
>>>>>
>>>>> I think dojofaces will not work until apply the patch on MYFACES-2564
>>>>> (look
>>>>> on subversion commits). This change was reverted but now we need it to
>>>>> complete the solution. Anyway we need to change it a little and maybe
>>>>> remove
>>>>> the code that checks for facelets view handler and takes into account
>>>>> to
>>>>
>>>> right, as I understand it users are asked/forced to get rid of that.
>>>>
>>>> -M
>>>>
>>>>> check if it is facelets for jsf 2.0 working or not.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Leonardo Uribe
>>>>>
>>>>> 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> it should work, by now, just go svn up on trunk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am interested in the results of testing your project.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Currently I'm putting my effords into dojofaces, so interest is
>>>>>>> there,
>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>> time is scarce ... sorry.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Ganesh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yeah, I understand that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [Facelets] deploying "old" Facelets templates with MyFaces 2
Posted by Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org>.
Thank you so much everyone for your efforts. I will instantly start testing with dojofaces and report my progres.
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
> can you try, now ?
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I implemented the lookup for the presence of the facelets-1.1.x view-handler
>> in the faces-config.xml in the factory, so that the users don't have to
>> explicitly set the related web.xml config parameter when they already said
>> that they want to use facelets-1.1.x in faces-config.xml (via defining the
>> facelets-1.1.x view-handler). Mojarra actually does exactly the same.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jakob
>>
>> 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Ganesh
>>>>
>>>> I think dojofaces will not work until apply the patch on MYFACES-2564
>>>> (look
>>>> on subversion commits). This change was reverted but now we need it to
>>>> complete the solution. Anyway we need to change it a little and maybe
>>>> remove
>>>> the code that checks for facelets view handler and takes into account to
>>> right, as I understand it users are asked/forced to get rid of that.
>>>
>>> -M
>>>
>>>> check if it is facelets for jsf 2.0 working or not.
>>>
>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>>
>>>> Leonardo Uribe
>>>>
>>>> 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>>>>> it should work, by now, just go svn up on trunk.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am interested in the results of testing your project.
>>>>>
>>>>> thx
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Currently I'm putting my effords into dojofaces, so interest is
>>>>>> there,
>>>>>> but
>>>>>> time is scarce ... sorry.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Ganesh
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>>>>>>> Yeah, I understand that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>
>
Re: [Facelets] deploying "old" Facelets templates with MyFaces 2
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
can you try, now ?
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I implemented the lookup for the presence of the facelets-1.1.x view-handler
> in the faces-config.xml in the factory, so that the users don't have to
> explicitly set the related web.xml config parameter when they already said
> that they want to use facelets-1.1.x in faces-config.xml (via defining the
> facelets-1.1.x view-handler). Mojarra actually does exactly the same.
>
> Regards,
> Jakob
>
> 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Ganesh
>> >
>> > I think dojofaces will not work until apply the patch on MYFACES-2564
>> > (look
>> > on subversion commits). This change was reverted but now we need it to
>> > complete the solution. Anyway we need to change it a little and maybe
>> > remove
>> > the code that checks for facelets view handler and takes into account to
>>
>> right, as I understand it users are asked/forced to get rid of that.
>>
>> -M
>>
>> > check if it is facelets for jsf 2.0 working or not.
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> > regards,
>> >
>> > Leonardo Uribe
>> >
>> > 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>> >>
>> >> it should work, by now, just go svn up on trunk.
>> >>
>> >> I am interested in the results of testing your project.
>> >>
>> >> thx
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org> wrote:
>> >> > Hi Matthias,
>> >> >
>> >> > Currently I'm putting my effords into dojofaces, so interest is
>> >> > there,
>> >> > but
>> >> > time is scarce ... sorry.
>> >> >
>> >> > Best regards,
>> >> > Ganesh
>> >> >
>> >> > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Yeah, I understand that.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -Matthias
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Matthias Wessendorf
>> >>
>> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [Facelets] deploying "old" Facelets templates with MyFaces 2
Posted by Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I implemented the lookup for the presence of the facelets-1.1.x view-handler
in the faces-config.xml in the factory, so that the users don't have to
explicitly set the related web.xml config parameter when they already said
that they want to use facelets-1.1.x in faces-config.xml (via defining the
facelets-1.1.x view-handler). Mojarra actually does exactly the same.
Regards,
Jakob
2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Ganesh
> >
> > I think dojofaces will not work until apply the patch on MYFACES-2564
> (look
> > on subversion commits). This change was reverted but now we need it to
> > complete the solution. Anyway we need to change it a little and maybe
> remove
> > the code that checks for facelets view handler and takes into account to
>
> right, as I understand it users are asked/forced to get rid of that.
>
> -M
>
> > check if it is facelets for jsf 2.0 working or not.
>
>
>
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Leonardo Uribe
> >
> > 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
> >>
> >> it should work, by now, just go svn up on trunk.
> >>
> >> I am interested in the results of testing your project.
> >>
> >> thx
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org> wrote:
> >> > Hi Matthias,
> >> >
> >> > Currently I'm putting my effords into dojofaces, so interest is there,
> >> > but
> >> > time is scarce ... sorry.
> >> >
> >> > Best regards,
> >> > Ganesh
> >> >
> >> > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
> >> >>
> >> >> Yeah, I understand that.
> >> >>
> >> >> Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
> >> >>
> >> >> -Matthias
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>
> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
Re: [Facelets] deploying "old" Facelets templates with MyFaces 2
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ganesh
>
> I think dojofaces will not work until apply the patch on MYFACES-2564 (look
> on subversion commits). This change was reverted but now we need it to
> complete the solution. Anyway we need to change it a little and maybe remove
> the code that checks for facelets view handler and takes into account to
right, as I understand it users are asked/forced to get rid of that.
-M
> check if it is facelets for jsf 2.0 working or not.
>
> regards,
>
> Leonardo Uribe
>
> 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>>
>> it should work, by now, just go svn up on trunk.
>>
>> I am interested in the results of testing your project.
>>
>> thx
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org> wrote:
>> > Hi Matthias,
>> >
>> > Currently I'm putting my effords into dojofaces, so interest is there,
>> > but
>> > time is scarce ... sorry.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Ganesh
>> >
>> > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>> >>
>> >> Yeah, I understand that.
>> >>
>> >> Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
>> >>
>> >> -Matthias
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [Facelets] deploying "old" Facelets templates with MyFaces 2
Posted by Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>.
Hi Ganesh
I think dojofaces will not work until apply the patch on MYFACES-2564 (look
on subversion commits). This change was reverted but now we need it to
complete the solution. Anyway we need to change it a little and maybe remove
the code that checks for facelets view handler and takes into account to
check if it is facelets for jsf 2.0 working or not.
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
> it should work, by now, just go svn up on trunk.
>
> I am interested in the results of testing your project.
>
> thx
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org> wrote:
> > Hi Matthias,
> >
> > Currently I'm putting my effords into dojofaces, so interest is there,
> but
> > time is scarce ... sorry.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Ganesh
> >
> > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
> >>
> >> Yeah, I understand that.
> >>
> >> Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
> >>
> >> -Matthias
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
Re: [Facelets] deploying "old" Facelets templates with MyFaces 2
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
it should work, by now, just go svn up on trunk.
I am interested in the results of testing your project.
thx
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org> wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Currently I'm putting my effords into dojofaces, so interest is there, but
> time is scarce ... sorry.
>
> Best regards,
> Ganesh
>
> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>>
>> Yeah, I understand that.
>>
>> Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
>>
>> -Matthias
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [Facelets] deploying "old" Facelets templates with MyFaces 2
Posted by Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org>.
Hi Matthias,
Currently I'm putting my effords into dojofaces, so interest is there, but time is scarce ... sorry.
Best regards,
Ganesh
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
> Yeah, I understand that.
>
> Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
>
> -Matthias
Re: [Facelets] deploying "old" Facelets templates with MyFaces 2
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
but... the spec *clearly* says that if you extend from OLD facelet classes,
you have to have to ship it.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> If we read every facelet 1.1.x tag lib xml file, it is possible to get
> ClassNotFoundException. The problem with this behavior is that it does not
> give the chance to users to fix it without change the original jar file.
>
> regards,
>
> Leonardo Uribe
>
> 2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
>>
>> Hi Leo,
>>
>> It is a really easy fix - I just removed the version check in
>> TagLibraryConfig to make "old" libraries work. If the EG changes the spec in
>> this field we can apply this later. In the meantime, I think we clearly
>> should support "old" facelets taglibs.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jakob
>>
>> 2010/2/25 Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Before commit it I would like to have the description about how this
>>> should work and ask or notify the EG about this behavior (so if they decide
>>> something different we have a chance to do it right). Since ri is doing
>>> something in this field, I think we can commit a solution for that.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> Leonardo Uribe
>>>
>>> 2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> I'll do it! I also have a working version running locally at the moment,
>>>> I just have to test it a little more. Then I'll commit it ;)
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Jakob
>>>>
>>>> 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, I understand that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
>>>>>
>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org> wrote:
>>>>> > Also this blocks me from testing the beta with DojoFaces which might
>>>>> > reveal
>>>>> > other issues ...
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Best regards,
>>>>> > Ganesh
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Again...
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> MYFACES-2543
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> *snip*
>>>>> >> If the answer to this question is "no", Facelets in JSF 2.0 is
>>>>> >> backwards compatible with pre-JSF 2.0 Facelets and such an
>>>>> >> application
>>>>> >> must not continue to bundle the Facelets jar file along with the
>>>>> >> application, and must not continue to set the Facelets configuration
>>>>> >> parameters.
>>>>> >> *snip*
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> So, this is actually blocking a reasonable use-case. Please keep the
>>>>> >> bug open ;-)
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> -Matthias
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [Facelets] deploying "old" Facelets templates with MyFaces 2
Posted by Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org>.
Hi Leo,
Did you check the solution I proposed?
Best regards,
Ganesh
Leonardo Uribe schrieb:
>
> In few words, we have to solve MYFACES-2564 too.
>
Re: [Facelets] deploying "old" Facelets templates with MyFaces 2
Posted by Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>.
Hi
Note that this behavior implies that all applications that are using JSP and
are upgraded to JSF 2.0 needs to add
javax.faces.DISABLE_FACELET_JSF_VIEWHANDLER to work correctly, otherwise if
the parser reads a "bad" facelet taglib file it could throw
ClassXXXExceptions. I would like to prevent that.
And the code on ViewDeclarationLanguageFactoryImpl does not take into
consideration the trinidad + facelets ViewHandler config style (check for
class to know if facelets is on is a bad idea).
In few words, we have to solve MYFACES-2564 too.
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
The code reverted on MYFACES-2564 needs to be applied too, but care must be
taken into account
2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
> From the spec (10.1.2):
>
>
> A decision was made early in this process to strive for backwards
> compatibility between the latest popular version of Facelets and
> Facelets in JSF 2.0. The sole determinant to backwards compatibility
> lies in the answer to the question,
>
>
> ===>
> "is there any Java code in the application, or in libraries used by
> the application, that extends from or depends on any class in package
> com.sun.facelets and/or its sub-packages?"
>
> If the answer to this question is "yes", Facelets in JSF 2.0 is not
> backwards compatibile with Facelets and such an application must
> continue to bundle the Facelets jar file along with the application,
> continue to set the Facelets configuration parameters, and also set
> the javax.faces.DISABLE_FACELET_JSF_VIEWHANDLER <context-param> to
> true. Please see Section 11.1.3 "Application Configuration Parameters"
> for details on this option. Any code that extends or depends on any
> class in package com.sun.facelets and/or its sub-packages must be
> modified to depend on the appropriate classes in package
> javax.faces.webapp.vdl and/or its subpackages.
> <===
>
> Also note the *java* in "java code".
>
> -Matthias
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > The problem is the spec is not explicit about that. I think the way it
> this
> > written those paragraph are as if it was a "guideline" and that's is the
> > problem because this should be explicit.
> >
> > The behavior proposed (throw ClassNotFoundException or ClassCastException
> > and kick all users to use facelets 1.1.x) is valid, so it is ok to commit
> > it.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Leonardo Uribe
> >
> > 2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> But the users DO want to run the "old" facelets taglibs and, as
> discussed
> >> before, 95% of the "old" taglibs don't rely on com.sun.facelets classes,
> >> they just define tags via xhtml files.
> >>
> >> If they get a ClassCastException the just have to use the old
> >> facelets-1.1.x. This is excatly what the spec says!
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Jakob
> >>
> >> 2010/2/25 Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> If we read every facelet 1.1.x tag lib xml file, it is possible to get
> >>> ClassNotFoundException. The problem with this behavior is that it does
> not
> >>> give the chance to users to fix it without change the original jar
> file.
> >>>
> >>> regards,
> >>>
> >>> Leonardo Uribe
> >>>
> >>> 2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Leo,
> >>>>
> >>>> It is a really easy fix - I just removed the version check in
> >>>> TagLibraryConfig to make "old" libraries work. If the EG changes the
> spec in
> >>>> this field we can apply this later. In the meantime, I think we
> clearly
> >>>> should support "old" facelets taglibs.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Jakob
> >>>>
> >>>> 2010/2/25 Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Before commit it I would like to have the description about how this
> >>>>> should work and ask or notify the EG about this behavior (so if they
> decide
> >>>>> something different we have a chance to do it right). Since ri is
> doing
> >>>>> something in this field, I think we can commit a solution for that.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> regards,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Leonardo Uribe
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'll do it! I also have a working version running locally at the
> >>>>>> moment, I just have to test it a little more. Then I'll commit it ;)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>> Jakob
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Yeah, I understand that.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Matthias
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>> > Also this blocks me from testing the beta with DojoFaces which
> >>>>>>> > might reveal
> >>>>>>> > other issues ...
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > Best regards,
> >>>>>>> > Ganesh
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
> >>>>>>> >>
> >>>>>>> >> Again...
> >>>>>>> >>
> >>>>>>> >> MYFACES-2543
> >>>>>>> >>
> >>>>>>> >> *snip*
> >>>>>>> >> If the answer to this question is "no", Facelets in JSF 2.0 is
> >>>>>>> >> backwards compatible with pre-JSF 2.0 Facelets and such an
> >>>>>>> >> application
> >>>>>>> >> must not continue to bundle the Facelets jar file along with the
> >>>>>>> >> application, and must not continue to set the Facelets
> >>>>>>> >> configuration
> >>>>>>> >> parameters.
> >>>>>>> >> *snip*
> >>>>>>> >>
> >>>>>>> >> So, this is actually blocking a reasonable use-case. Please keep
> >>>>>>> >> the
> >>>>>>> >> bug open ;-)
> >>>>>>> >>
> >>>>>>> >> -Matthias
> >>>>>>> >>
> >>>>>>> >>
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >>>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> >>>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
Re: [Facelets] deploying "old" Facelets templates with MyFaces 2
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
>From the spec (10.1.2):
A decision was made early in this process to strive for backwards
compatibility between the latest popular version of Facelets and
Facelets in JSF 2.0. The sole determinant to backwards compatibility
lies in the answer to the question,
===>
"is there any Java code in the application, or in libraries used by
the application, that extends from or depends on any class in package
com.sun.facelets and/or its sub-packages?"
If the answer to this question is "yes", Facelets in JSF 2.0 is not
backwards compatibile with Facelets and such an application must
continue to bundle the Facelets jar file along with the application,
continue to set the Facelets configuration parameters, and also set
the javax.faces.DISABLE_FACELET_JSF_VIEWHANDLER <context-param> to
true. Please see Section 11.1.3 "Application Configuration Parameters"
for details on this option. Any code that extends or depends on any
class in package com.sun.facelets and/or its sub-packages must be
modified to depend on the appropriate classes in package
javax.faces.webapp.vdl and/or its subpackages.
<===
Also note the *java* in "java code".
-Matthias
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> The problem is the spec is not explicit about that. I think the way it this
> written those paragraph are as if it was a "guideline" and that's is the
> problem because this should be explicit.
>
> The behavior proposed (throw ClassNotFoundException or ClassCastException
> and kick all users to use facelets 1.1.x) is valid, so it is ok to commit
> it.
>
> regards,
>
> Leonardo Uribe
>
> 2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> But the users DO want to run the "old" facelets taglibs and, as discussed
>> before, 95% of the "old" taglibs don't rely on com.sun.facelets classes,
>> they just define tags via xhtml files.
>>
>> If they get a ClassCastException the just have to use the old
>> facelets-1.1.x. This is excatly what the spec says!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jakob
>>
>> 2010/2/25 Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> If we read every facelet 1.1.x tag lib xml file, it is possible to get
>>> ClassNotFoundException. The problem with this behavior is that it does not
>>> give the chance to users to fix it without change the original jar file.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> Leonardo Uribe
>>>
>>> 2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Leo,
>>>>
>>>> It is a really easy fix - I just removed the version check in
>>>> TagLibraryConfig to make "old" libraries work. If the EG changes the spec in
>>>> this field we can apply this later. In the meantime, I think we clearly
>>>> should support "old" facelets taglibs.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Jakob
>>>>
>>>> 2010/2/25 Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> Before commit it I would like to have the description about how this
>>>>> should work and ask or notify the EG about this behavior (so if they decide
>>>>> something different we have a chance to do it right). Since ri is doing
>>>>> something in this field, I think we can commit a solution for that.
>>>>>
>>>>> regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Leonardo Uribe
>>>>>
>>>>> 2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll do it! I also have a working version running locally at the
>>>>>> moment, I just have to test it a little more. Then I'll commit it ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Jakob
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, I understand that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> > Also this blocks me from testing the beta with DojoFaces which
>>>>>>> > might reveal
>>>>>>> > other issues ...
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Best regards,
>>>>>>> > Ganesh
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Again...
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> MYFACES-2543
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> *snip*
>>>>>>> >> If the answer to this question is "no", Facelets in JSF 2.0 is
>>>>>>> >> backwards compatible with pre-JSF 2.0 Facelets and such an
>>>>>>> >> application
>>>>>>> >> must not continue to bundle the Facelets jar file along with the
>>>>>>> >> application, and must not continue to set the Facelets
>>>>>>> >> configuration
>>>>>>> >> parameters.
>>>>>>> >> *snip*
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> So, this is actually blocking a reasonable use-case. Please keep
>>>>>>> >> the
>>>>>>> >> bug open ;-)
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> -Matthias
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [Facelets] deploying "old" Facelets templates with MyFaces 2
Posted by Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>.
Hi
The problem is the spec is not explicit about that. I think the way it this
written those paragraph are as if it was a "guideline" and that's is the
problem because this should be explicit.
The behavior proposed (throw ClassNotFoundException or ClassCastException
and kick all users to use facelets 1.1.x) is valid, so it is ok to commit
it.
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
> Hi,
>
> But the users DO want to run the "old" facelets taglibs and, as discussed
> before, 95% of the "old" taglibs don't rely on com.sun.facelets classes,
> they just define tags via xhtml files.
>
> If they get a ClassCastException the just have to use the old
> facelets-1.1.x. This is excatly what the spec says!
>
>
> Regards,
> Jakob
>
> 2010/2/25 Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
>
>> Hi
>>
>> If we read every facelet 1.1.x tag lib xml file, it is possible to get
>> ClassNotFoundException. The problem with this behavior is that it does not
>> give the chance to users to fix it without change the original jar file.
>>
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Leonardo Uribe
>>
>> 2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
>>
>>> Hi Leo,
>>>
>>> It is a really easy fix - I just removed the version check in
>>> TagLibraryConfig to make "old" libraries work. If the EG changes the spec in
>>> this field we can apply this later. In the meantime, I think we clearly
>>> should support "old" facelets taglibs.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jakob
>>>
>>> 2010/2/25 Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Before commit it I would like to have the description about how this
>>>> should work and ask or notify the EG about this behavior (so if they decide
>>>> something different we have a chance to do it right). Since ri is doing
>>>> something in this field, I think we can commit a solution for that.
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>>
>>>> Leonardo Uribe
>>>>
>>>> 2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> I'll do it! I also have a working version running locally at the moment,
>>>>> I just have to test it a little more. Then I'll commit it ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Jakob
>>>>>
>>>>> 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, I understand that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org> wrote:
>>>>>> > Also this blocks me from testing the beta with DojoFaces which might
>>>>>> reveal
>>>>>> > other issues ...
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Best regards,
>>>>>> > Ganesh
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Again...
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> MYFACES-2543
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> *snip*
>>>>>> >> If the answer to this question is "no", Facelets in JSF 2.0 is
>>>>>> >> backwards compatible with pre-JSF 2.0 Facelets and such an
>>>>>> application
>>>>>> >> must not continue to bundle the Facelets jar file along with the
>>>>>> >> application, and must not continue to set the Facelets
>>>>>> configuration
>>>>>> >> parameters.
>>>>>> >> *snip*
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> So, this is actually blocking a reasonable use-case. Please keep
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> >> bug open ;-)
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> -Matthias
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [Facelets] deploying "old" Facelets templates with MyFaces 2
Posted by Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
But the users DO want to run the "old" facelets taglibs and, as discussed
before, 95% of the "old" taglibs don't rely on com.sun.facelets classes,
they just define tags via xhtml files.
If they get a ClassCastException the just have to use the old
facelets-1.1.x. This is excatly what the spec says!
Regards,
Jakob
2010/2/25 Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
> Hi
>
> If we read every facelet 1.1.x tag lib xml file, it is possible to get
> ClassNotFoundException. The problem with this behavior is that it does not
> give the chance to users to fix it without change the original jar file.
>
>
> regards,
>
> Leonardo Uribe
>
> 2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
>
>> Hi Leo,
>>
>> It is a really easy fix - I just removed the version check in
>> TagLibraryConfig to make "old" libraries work. If the EG changes the spec in
>> this field we can apply this later. In the meantime, I think we clearly
>> should support "old" facelets taglibs.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jakob
>>
>> 2010/2/25 Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
>>
>> Hi
>>>
>>> Before commit it I would like to have the description about how this
>>> should work and ask or notify the EG about this behavior (so if they decide
>>> something different we have a chance to do it right). Since ri is doing
>>> something in this field, I think we can commit a solution for that.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> Leonardo Uribe
>>>
>>> 2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I'll do it! I also have a working version running locally at the moment,
>>>> I just have to test it a little more. Then I'll commit it ;)
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Jakob
>>>>
>>>> 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I understand that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
>>>>>
>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org> wrote:
>>>>> > Also this blocks me from testing the beta with DojoFaces which might
>>>>> reveal
>>>>> > other issues ...
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Best regards,
>>>>> > Ganesh
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Again...
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> MYFACES-2543
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> *snip*
>>>>> >> If the answer to this question is "no", Facelets in JSF 2.0 is
>>>>> >> backwards compatible with pre-JSF 2.0 Facelets and such an
>>>>> application
>>>>> >> must not continue to bundle the Facelets jar file along with the
>>>>> >> application, and must not continue to set the Facelets configuration
>>>>> >> parameters.
>>>>> >> *snip*
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> So, this is actually blocking a reasonable use-case. Please keep the
>>>>> >> bug open ;-)
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> -Matthias
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [Facelets] deploying "old" Facelets templates with MyFaces 2
Posted by Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>.
Hi
If we read every facelet 1.1.x tag lib xml file, it is possible to get
ClassNotFoundException. The problem with this behavior is that it does not
give the chance to users to fix it without change the original jar file.
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
> Hi Leo,
>
> It is a really easy fix - I just removed the version check in
> TagLibraryConfig to make "old" libraries work. If the EG changes the spec in
> this field we can apply this later. In the meantime, I think we clearly
> should support "old" facelets taglibs.
>
> Regards,
> Jakob
>
> 2010/2/25 Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
>
> Hi
>>
>> Before commit it I would like to have the description about how this
>> should work and ask or notify the EG about this behavior (so if they decide
>> something different we have a chance to do it right). Since ri is doing
>> something in this field, I think we can commit a solution for that.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Leonardo Uribe
>>
>> 2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
>>
>> I'll do it! I also have a working version running locally at the moment, I
>>> just have to test it a little more. Then I'll commit it ;)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jakob
>>>
>>> 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>>>
>>> Yeah, I understand that.
>>>>
>>>> Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
>>>>
>>>> -Matthias
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org> wrote:
>>>> > Also this blocks me from testing the beta with DojoFaces which might
>>>> reveal
>>>> > other issues ...
>>>> >
>>>> > Best regards,
>>>> > Ganesh
>>>> >
>>>> > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Again...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> MYFACES-2543
>>>> >>
>>>> >> *snip*
>>>> >> If the answer to this question is "no", Facelets in JSF 2.0 is
>>>> >> backwards compatible with pre-JSF 2.0 Facelets and such an
>>>> application
>>>> >> must not continue to bundle the Facelets jar file along with the
>>>> >> application, and must not continue to set the Facelets configuration
>>>> >> parameters.
>>>> >> *snip*
>>>> >>
>>>> >> So, this is actually blocking a reasonable use-case. Please keep the
>>>> >> bug open ;-)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> -Matthias
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [Facelets] deploying "old" Facelets templates with MyFaces 2
Posted by Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>.
It works now ;)
2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
> +1 on sooner arrival as later. Current behavior is just lame
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Leo,
> >
> > It is a really easy fix - I just removed the version check in
> > TagLibraryConfig to make "old" libraries work. If the EG changes the spec
> in
> > this field we can apply this later. In the meantime, I think we clearly
> > should support "old" facelets taglibs.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jakob
> >
> > 2010/2/25 Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Before commit it I would like to have the description about how this
> >> should work and ask or notify the EG about this behavior (so if they
> decide
> >> something different we have a chance to do it right). Since ri is doing
> >> something in this field, I think we can commit a solution for that.
> >>
> >> regards,
> >>
> >> Leonardo Uribe
> >>
> >> 2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>> I'll do it! I also have a working version running locally at the
> moment,
> >>> I just have to test it a little more. Then I'll commit it ;)
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Jakob
> >>>
> >>> 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
> >>>>
> >>>> Yeah, I understand that.
> >>>>
> >>>> Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
> >>>>
> >>>> -Matthias
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org> wrote:
> >>>> > Also this blocks me from testing the beta with DojoFaces which might
> >>>> > reveal
> >>>> > other issues ...
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Best regards,
> >>>> > Ganesh
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Again...
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> MYFACES-2543
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> *snip*
> >>>> >> If the answer to this question is "no", Facelets in JSF 2.0 is
> >>>> >> backwards compatible with pre-JSF 2.0 Facelets and such an
> >>>> >> application
> >>>> >> must not continue to bundle the Facelets jar file along with the
> >>>> >> application, and must not continue to set the Facelets
> configuration
> >>>> >> parameters.
> >>>> >> *snip*
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> So, this is actually blocking a reasonable use-case. Please keep
> the
> >>>> >> bug open ;-)
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> -Matthias
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>>>
> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
Re: [Facelets] deploying "old" Facelets templates with MyFaces 2
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
+1 on sooner arrival as later. Current behavior is just lame
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Leo,
>
> It is a really easy fix - I just removed the version check in
> TagLibraryConfig to make "old" libraries work. If the EG changes the spec in
> this field we can apply this later. In the meantime, I think we clearly
> should support "old" facelets taglibs.
>
> Regards,
> Jakob
>
> 2010/2/25 Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Before commit it I would like to have the description about how this
>> should work and ask or notify the EG about this behavior (so if they decide
>> something different we have a chance to do it right). Since ri is doing
>> something in this field, I think we can commit a solution for that.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Leonardo Uribe
>>
>> 2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I'll do it! I also have a working version running locally at the moment,
>>> I just have to test it a little more. Then I'll commit it ;)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jakob
>>>
>>> 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I understand that.
>>>>
>>>> Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
>>>>
>>>> -Matthias
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org> wrote:
>>>> > Also this blocks me from testing the beta with DojoFaces which might
>>>> > reveal
>>>> > other issues ...
>>>> >
>>>> > Best regards,
>>>> > Ganesh
>>>> >
>>>> > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Again...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> MYFACES-2543
>>>> >>
>>>> >> *snip*
>>>> >> If the answer to this question is "no", Facelets in JSF 2.0 is
>>>> >> backwards compatible with pre-JSF 2.0 Facelets and such an
>>>> >> application
>>>> >> must not continue to bundle the Facelets jar file along with the
>>>> >> application, and must not continue to set the Facelets configuration
>>>> >> parameters.
>>>> >> *snip*
>>>> >>
>>>> >> So, this is actually blocking a reasonable use-case. Please keep the
>>>> >> bug open ;-)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> -Matthias
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [Facelets] deploying "old" Facelets templates with MyFaces 2
Posted by Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>.
Hi Leo,
It is a really easy fix - I just removed the version check in
TagLibraryConfig to make "old" libraries work. If the EG changes the spec in
this field we can apply this later. In the meantime, I think we clearly
should support "old" facelets taglibs.
Regards,
Jakob
2010/2/25 Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
> Hi
>
> Before commit it I would like to have the description about how this should
> work and ask or notify the EG about this behavior (so if they decide
> something different we have a chance to do it right). Since ri is doing
> something in this field, I think we can commit a solution for that.
>
> regards,
>
> Leonardo Uribe
>
> 2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
>
> I'll do it! I also have a working version running locally at the moment, I
>> just have to test it a little more. Then I'll commit it ;)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jakob
>>
>> 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>>
>> Yeah, I understand that.
>>>
>>> Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
>>>
>>> -Matthias
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org> wrote:
>>> > Also this blocks me from testing the beta with DojoFaces which might
>>> reveal
>>> > other issues ...
>>> >
>>> > Best regards,
>>> > Ganesh
>>> >
>>> > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>>> >>
>>> >> Again...
>>> >>
>>> >> MYFACES-2543
>>> >>
>>> >> *snip*
>>> >> If the answer to this question is "no", Facelets in JSF 2.0 is
>>> >> backwards compatible with pre-JSF 2.0 Facelets and such an application
>>> >> must not continue to bundle the Facelets jar file along with the
>>> >> application, and must not continue to set the Facelets configuration
>>> >> parameters.
>>> >> *snip*
>>> >>
>>> >> So, this is actually blocking a reasonable use-case. Please keep the
>>> >> bug open ;-)
>>> >>
>>> >> -Matthias
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [Facelets] deploying "old" Facelets templates with MyFaces 2
Posted by Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>.
Hi
Before commit it I would like to have the description about how this should
work and ask or notify the EG about this behavior (so if they decide
something different we have a chance to do it right). Since ri is doing
something in this field, I think we can commit a solution for that.
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
> I'll do it! I also have a working version running locally at the moment, I
> just have to test it a little more. Then I'll commit it ;)
>
> Regards,
> Jakob
>
> 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>
> Yeah, I understand that.
>>
>> Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org> wrote:
>> > Also this blocks me from testing the beta with DojoFaces which might
>> reveal
>> > other issues ...
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Ganesh
>> >
>> > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>> >>
>> >> Again...
>> >>
>> >> MYFACES-2543
>> >>
>> >> *snip*
>> >> If the answer to this question is "no", Facelets in JSF 2.0 is
>> >> backwards compatible with pre-JSF 2.0 Facelets and such an application
>> >> must not continue to bundle the Facelets jar file along with the
>> >> application, and must not continue to set the Facelets configuration
>> >> parameters.
>> >> *snip*
>> >>
>> >> So, this is actually blocking a reasonable use-case. Please keep the
>> >> bug open ;-)
>> >>
>> >> -Matthias
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>
Re: [Facelets] deploying "old" Facelets templates with MyFaces 2
Posted by Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>.
I'll do it! I also have a working version running locally at the moment, I
just have to test it a little more. Then I'll commit it ;)
Regards,
Jakob
2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
> Yeah, I understand that.
>
> Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
>
> -Matthias
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org> wrote:
> > Also this blocks me from testing the beta with DojoFaces which might
> reveal
> > other issues ...
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Ganesh
> >
> > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
> >>
> >> Again...
> >>
> >> MYFACES-2543
> >>
> >> *snip*
> >> If the answer to this question is "no", Facelets in JSF 2.0 is
> >> backwards compatible with pre-JSF 2.0 Facelets and such an application
> >> must not continue to bundle the Facelets jar file along with the
> >> application, and must not continue to set the Facelets configuration
> >> parameters.
> >> *snip*
> >>
> >> So, this is actually blocking a reasonable use-case. Please keep the
> >> bug open ;-)
> >>
> >> -Matthias
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
Re: [Facelets] deploying "old" Facelets templates with MyFaces 2
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
Yeah, I understand that.
Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
-Matthias
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org> wrote:
> Also this blocks me from testing the beta with DojoFaces which might reveal
> other issues ...
>
> Best regards,
> Ganesh
>
> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>>
>> Again...
>>
>> MYFACES-2543
>>
>> *snip*
>> If the answer to this question is "no", Facelets in JSF 2.0 is
>> backwards compatible with pre-JSF 2.0 Facelets and such an application
>> must not continue to bundle the Facelets jar file along with the
>> application, and must not continue to set the Facelets configuration
>> parameters.
>> *snip*
>>
>> So, this is actually blocking a reasonable use-case. Please keep the
>> bug open ;-)
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [Facelets] deploying "old" Facelets templates with MyFaces 2
Posted by Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org>.
Also this blocks me from testing the beta with DojoFaces which might reveal other issues ...
Best regards,
Ganesh
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
> Again...
>
> MYFACES-2543
>
> *snip*
> If the answer to this question is "no", Facelets in JSF 2.0 is
> backwards compatible with pre-JSF 2.0 Facelets and such an application
> must not continue to bundle the Facelets jar file along with the
> application, and must not continue to set the Facelets configuration
> parameters.
> *snip*
>
> So, this is actually blocking a reasonable use-case. Please keep the
> bug open ;-)
>
> -Matthias
>
>