You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com> on 2015/04/23 17:01:04 UTC
new mailing lists ?
Hi guys,
we have now a few more active projects, and I'm wondering if it's not
time to request more mailong lists for them. More specifcially, it seems
like those mailing list would be good to have :
- studio-dev
- kerby-dev
- fortress-dev
That would make it easier for us, don't you think so ?
Thanks !
RE: new mailing lists ?
Posted by "Li, Jiajia" <ji...@intel.com>.
+1 good!
-----Original Message-----
From: Shawn McKinney [mailto:smckinney@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 8:12 AM
To: Apache Directory Developers List
Subject: Re: new mailing lists ?
+1
Shawn
smckinney@apache.org
> On Apr 23, 2015, at 7:03 PM, Zheng, Kai <ka...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Sounds great! I agree.
>
> Regards,
> Kai
>
> From: Lucas Theisen [mailto:lucastheisen@pastdev.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 7:42 AM
> To: Apache Directory Developers List
> Subject: Re: new mailing lists ?
>
> I agree, kerby and fortress have a large volume of messages, and a relatively distinct set of interested parties.
>
> On Apr 23, 2015 4:18 PM, "Kiran Ayyagari" <ka...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> we have now a few more active projects, and I'm wondering if it's not
> time to request more mailong lists for them. More specifcially, it
> seems like those mailing list would be good to have :
> - studio-dev
> low traffic, I don't think it is needed
> - kerby-dev
> - fortress-dev
> +1 to both
>
> That would make it easier for us, don't you think so ?
>
> Thanks !
>
>
>
>
> --
> Kiran Ayyagari
> http://keydap.com
Re: new mailing lists ?
Posted by Shawn McKinney <sm...@apache.org>.
+1
Shawn
smckinney@apache.org
> On Apr 23, 2015, at 7:03 PM, Zheng, Kai <ka...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Sounds great! I agree.
>
> Regards,
> Kai
>
> From: Lucas Theisen [mailto:lucastheisen@pastdev.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 7:42 AM
> To: Apache Directory Developers List
> Subject: Re: new mailing lists ?
>
> I agree, kerby and fortress have a large volume of messages, and a relatively distinct set of interested parties.
>
> On Apr 23, 2015 4:18 PM, "Kiran Ayyagari" <ka...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> we have now a few more active projects, and I'm wondering if it's not
> time to request more mailong lists for them. More specifcially, it seems
> like those mailing list would be good to have :
> - studio-dev
> low traffic, I don't think it is needed
> - kerby-dev
> - fortress-dev
> +1 to both
>
> That would make it easier for us, don't you think so ?
>
> Thanks !
>
>
>
>
> --
> Kiran Ayyagari
> http://keydap.com
RE: new mailing lists ?
Posted by "Zheng, Kai" <ka...@intel.com>.
Sounds great! I agree.
Regards,
Kai
From: Lucas Theisen [mailto:lucastheisen@pastdev.com]
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 7:42 AM
To: Apache Directory Developers List
Subject: Re: new mailing lists ?
I agree, kerby and fortress have a large volume of messages, and a relatively distinct set of interested parties.
On Apr 23, 2015 4:18 PM, "Kiran Ayyagari" <ka...@apache.org>> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi guys,
we have now a few more active projects, and I'm wondering if it's not
time to request more mailong lists for them. More specifcially, it seems
like those mailing list would be good to have :
- studio-dev
low traffic, I don't think it is needed
- kerby-dev
- fortress-dev
+1 to both
That would make it easier for us, don't you think so ?
Thanks !
--
Kiran Ayyagari
http://keydap.com
Re: new mailing lists ?
Posted by Lucas Theisen <lu...@pastdev.com>.
I agree, kerby and fortress have a large volume of messages, and a
relatively distinct set of interested parties.
On Apr 23, 2015 4:18 PM, "Kiran Ayyagari" <ka...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> we have now a few more active projects, and I'm wondering if it's not
>> time to request more mailong lists for them. More specifcially, it seems
>> like those mailing list would be good to have :
>> - studio-dev
>>
> low traffic, I don't think it is needed
>
>> - kerby-dev
>> - fortress-dev
>>
> +1 to both
>
>>
>> That would make it easier for us, don't you think so ?
>>
>> Thanks !
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Kiran Ayyagari
> http://keydap.com
>
Re: new mailing lists ?
Posted by Kiran Ayyagari <ka...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> we have now a few more active projects, and I'm wondering if it's not
> time to request more mailong lists for them. More specifcially, it seems
> like those mailing list would be good to have :
> - studio-dev
>
low traffic, I don't think it is needed
> - kerby-dev
> - fortress-dev
>
+1 to both
>
> That would make it easier for us, don't you think so ?
>
> Thanks !
>
>
--
Kiran Ayyagari
http://keydap.com
RE: new mailing lists ?
Posted by "Zheng, Kai" <ka...@intel.com>.
>> I don't think we need a vote, and yes a ML for Kerby is all we need now.
Thank you all for the good consideration, it would be helpful a lot!
Regards,
Kai
From: Kiran Ayyagari [mailto:kayyagari@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 4:11 PM
To: Apache Directory Developers List
Subject: Re: new mailing lists ?
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Le 24/04/15 08:06, Stefan Seelmann a écrit :
> On 04/23/2015 05:01 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> we have now a few more active projects, and I'm wondering if it's not
>> time to request more mailong lists for them. More specifcially, it seems
>> like those mailing list would be good to have :
>> - studio-dev
>> - kerby-dev
>> - fortress-dev
>>
>> That would make it easier for us, don't you think so ?
> +1 for Kerby, there is very much activity
>
> +0 for Fortress, I think it is still connected to the rest, it also
> depends on LDAP API and uses ApacheDS libs.
There is already a fortress ML, which is targetting users and dev. We
can move all fortress mails to this existing ML, no urgent need for a
fortress-dev atm.
>
> I don't think we need it for Studio, there has already been more
> activity in the past.
Ok.
Kiran, I don't think we need a formal vote to create a kerby ML. Should
we consider that this is the only ML we need atm ?
I don't think we need a vote, and yes a ML for Kerby is all we need now.
--
Kiran Ayyagari
http://keydap.com
Re: new mailing lists ?
Posted by Kiran Ayyagari <ka...@apache.org>.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Le 24/04/15 08:06, Stefan Seelmann a écrit :
> > On 04/23/2015 05:01 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> we have now a few more active projects, and I'm wondering if it's not
> >> time to request more mailong lists for them. More specifcially, it seems
> >> like those mailing list would be good to have :
> >> - studio-dev
> >> - kerby-dev
> >> - fortress-dev
> >>
> >> That would make it easier for us, don't you think so ?
> > +1 for Kerby, there is very much activity
> >
> > +0 for Fortress, I think it is still connected to the rest, it also
> > depends on LDAP API and uses ApacheDS libs.
>
> There is already a fortress ML, which is targetting users and dev. We
> can move all fortress mails to this existing ML, no urgent need for a
> fortress-dev atm.
>
> >
> > I don't think we need it for Studio, there has already been more
> > activity in the past.
>
> Ok.
>
> Kiran, I don't think we need a formal vote to create a kerby ML. Should
> we consider that this is the only ML we need atm ?
>
I don't think we need a vote, and yes a ML for Kerby is all we need now.
--
Kiran Ayyagari
http://keydap.com
Re: new mailing lists ?
Posted by Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com>.
Le 24/04/15 08:06, Stefan Seelmann a écrit :
> On 04/23/2015 05:01 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> we have now a few more active projects, and I'm wondering if it's not
>> time to request more mailong lists for them. More specifcially, it seems
>> like those mailing list would be good to have :
>> - studio-dev
>> - kerby-dev
>> - fortress-dev
>>
>> That would make it easier for us, don't you think so ?
> +1 for Kerby, there is very much activity
>
> +0 for Fortress, I think it is still connected to the rest, it also
> depends on LDAP API and uses ApacheDS libs.
There is already a fortress ML, which is targetting users and dev. We
can move all fortress mails to this existing ML, no urgent need for a
fortress-dev atm.
>
> I don't think we need it for Studio, there has already been more
> activity in the past.
Ok.
Kiran, I don't think we need a formal vote to create a kerby ML. Should
we consider that this is the only ML we need atm ?
Re: new mailing lists ?
Posted by Stefan Seelmann <ma...@stefan-seelmann.de>.
On 04/23/2015 05:01 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> we have now a few more active projects, and I'm wondering if it's not
> time to request more mailong lists for them. More specifcially, it seems
> like those mailing list would be good to have :
> - studio-dev
> - kerby-dev
> - fortress-dev
>
> That would make it easier for us, don't you think so ?
+1 for Kerby, there is very much activity
+0 for Fortress, I think it is still connected to the rest, it also
depends on LDAP API and uses ApacheDS libs.
I don't think we need it for Studio, there has already been more
activity in the past.
Kind Regards,
Stefan
Re: new mailing lists ?
Posted by Lin Chen <li...@foxmail.com>.
+1 for kerby!
Thanks,
Lin
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "elecharny";<el...@gmail.com>;
Date: Thu, Apr 23, 2015 11:01 PM
To: "Apache Directory Developers List"<de...@directory.apache.org>;
Subject: new mailing lists ?
Hi guys,
we have now a few more active projects, and I'm wondering if it's not
time to request more mailong lists for them. More specifcially, it seems
like those mailing list would be good to have :
- studio-dev
- kerby-dev
- fortress-dev
That would make it easier for us, don't you think so ?
Thanks !