a direct way to connect to activemq without tcp overhead ?

[christoph_75 <ch...@alcatel-lucent.com>]

Is there a direct way to connect to activeMq without the tcp overhead.
since the consumer and jmsbroker will reside on the same server there is
really no need for a wire protocol in between.

I am using the activemq-cpp-library-3.1.2 and activemq 5.3.1
one possibility might maybe using the vm transport , but i don't see any 
vmTransportfactory in the activemq-cpp-library-3.1.2 , 
so i guess the vm transport isn't supported in this library , correct ?

thank you for your time 

Christoph
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/a-direct-way-to-connect-to-activemq-without-tcp-overhead---tp28252722p28252722.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: a direct way to connect to activemq without tcp overhead ?

[Ivan Pechorin <iv...@gmail.com>]

christoph_75 wrote:
> 
> I am using the activemq-cpp-library-3.1.2 and activemq 5.3.1
> one possibility might maybe using the vm transport , but i don't see any 
> vmTransportfactory in the activemq-cpp-library-3.1.2 , 
> so i guess the vm transport isn't supported in this library , correct ?
> 

VM transport passes Java objects from client to broker, so it is unlikely
that it will be ever supported in C++ client :) So, it seems like there is
no easy way to connect to an ActiveMQ broker from C++ client without TCP
overhead.
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/a-direct-way-to-connect-to-activemq-without-tcp-overhead---tp28252722p28287950.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.