[collections] package observed --> observable

[Michael Heuer <he...@acm.org>]

While I'm at giving my thoughts on names for things, I would also like to
see the package o.a.c.collections.observed change to observable to match
the class names.  I can submit a patch if desired, but most of the change
is in cvs, not in the source code.

   michael


On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Michael Heuer wrote:

>
> For what it's worth, I much prefer using the name [primitives] to
> [pcollections].
>
> (non-binding) +1
>
>    michael
>
>
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>
> > Should we name it [pcollections]? Or is [primitives] better? (The sandbox
> > primitives is then a sandbox for the proper component for experimentation).
> >
> > I had forgotten about the special io input stream stuff, which might lead to
> > the name [primitives]. I don't think that this affects the vote, but it does
> > affect the CVS creation!
> >
> > Stephen
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org