[woody] "v2" flow integration (was Re: initialize form control values)

[Mark Lundquist <ml...@wrinkledog.com>]

On Feb 15, 2004, at 12:03 AM, Bruno Dumon wrote:

> <..snip..>
>
> And then there's also the "v2" woody-flowscript integration which is
> similar but more powerful.

Is there a summary somewhere of the differences between v2, and uh... 
"v1"? :-)

It looks like in v2, the javascript createBinding() would just be 
called from the flow, is that right?  (no more <map:call 
function="woody", right?)

— Mark


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org

Re: [woody] "v2" flow integration (was Re: initialize form control values)

[Bruno Dumon <br...@outerthought.org>]

On Sun, 2004-02-15 at 12:12, Mark Lundquist wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2004, at 12:03 AM, Bruno Dumon wrote:
> 
> > <..snip..>
> >
> > And then there's also the "v2" woody-flowscript integration which is
> > similar but more powerful.
> 
> Is there a summary somewhere of the differences between v2, and uh... 
> "v1"? :-)

Here's some info on v2:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=107531818111033&w=2

> 
> It looks like in v2, the javascript createBinding() would just be 
> called from the flow, is that right?  (no more <map:call 
> function="woody", right?)

I'd do the same with v1. I always create Form objects myself (like in
the sample on the wiki), not relying on the "woody" function. I don't
see any advantage in the woody function. The Woody samples should be
adjusted in this regard.

-- 
Bruno Dumon                             http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
bruno@outerthought.org                          bruno@apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org