You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to github@arrow.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/01/03 19:08:10 UTC
[GitHub] [arrow] westonpace commented on a change in pull request #12031: ARROW-15138: [C++] Make ExecPlan::ToString give some additional information
westonpace commented on a change in pull request #12031:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/12031#discussion_r777654664
##########
File path: cpp/src/arrow/compute/exec/plan_test.cc
##########
@@ -301,11 +301,11 @@ TEST(ExecPlan, ToString) {
{"sink", SinkNodeOptions{&sink_gen}},
})
.AddToPlan(plan.get()));
- EXPECT_EQ(plan->sources()[0]->ToString(), R"(:SourceNode{outputs=[:SinkNode]})");
- EXPECT_EQ(plan->sinks()[0]->ToString(), R"(:SinkNode{inputs=[collected=:SourceNode]})");
+ EXPECT_EQ(plan->sources()[0]->ToString(), R"(:SourceNode{})");
+ EXPECT_EQ(plan->sinks()[0]->ToString(), R"(:SinkNode{})");
EXPECT_EQ(plan->ToString(), R"(ExecPlan with 2 nodes:
-:SourceNode{outputs=[:SinkNode]}
-:SinkNode{inputs=[collected=:SourceNode]}
+:SinkNode{}
+ :SourceNode{}
Review comment:
I would not worry about it.
`ExecPlan::AddNode` will attach a label (auto-incrementing id counter) if none is set so there should not be any valid cases where there is no label.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@arrow.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org