You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4cxx-dev@logging.apache.org by Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com> on 2012/11/27 21:56:26 UTC
LOGCXX-321 fixed?
Hi,
esp @Andrew:
isn't this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGCXX-321
fixed by your latest patch?
Cheers
Christian
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de
Re: LOGCXX-321 fixed?
Posted by Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>.
OK. I closed it, thanks!
Currently I go throuh the other issues
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:41 AM, Andrew Lazarus <dr...@me.com> wrote:
> I can’t verify the specifics, as I don’t have an Ubuntu build to test on. But I would close it; no one has touched it recently and it seems highly dependent on non-Apache environmental factors.
>
> On Nov 28, 2012, at 14:07, Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Andrew Lazarus <dr...@me.com> wrote:
>>> I think it is more likely that it has been resolved by header re-organization in the Clang version of STL, than by my patches in particular.
>>>
>>> I have just started using Google Test, on my same new project, and it also failed to work out-of-the-box with Clang’s STL, referring to the now-obsolete and deleted std::tr1 namespace.
>>
>> Hm ok. Then when I understand correctly we can close this issue, right?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Christian
>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 27, 2012, at 12:56, Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> esp @Andrew:
>>>>
>>>> isn't this issue:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGCXX-321
>>>> fixed by your latest patch?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Christian
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>>>> https://www.timeandbill.de
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>> https://www.timeandbill.de
>
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de
Re: LOGCXX-321 fixed?
Posted by Andrew Lazarus <dr...@me.com>.
I can’t verify the specifics, as I don’t have an Ubuntu build to test on. But I would close it; no one has touched it recently and it seems highly dependent on non-Apache environmental factors.
On Nov 28, 2012, at 14:07, Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Andrew Lazarus <dr...@me.com> wrote:
>> I think it is more likely that it has been resolved by header re-organization in the Clang version of STL, than by my patches in particular.
>>
>> I have just started using Google Test, on my same new project, and it also failed to work out-of-the-box with Clang’s STL, referring to the now-obsolete and deleted std::tr1 namespace.
>
> Hm ok. Then when I understand correctly we can close this issue, right?
>
> Cheers
> Christian
>
>>
>> On Nov 27, 2012, at 12:56, Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> esp @Andrew:
>>>
>>> isn't this issue:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGCXX-321
>>> fixed by your latest patch?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>>> https://www.timeandbill.de
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.grobmeier.de
> https://www.timeandbill.de
Re: LOGCXX-321 fixed?
Posted by Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Andrew Lazarus <dr...@me.com> wrote:
> I think it is more likely that it has been resolved by header re-organization in the Clang version of STL, than by my patches in particular.
>
> I have just started using Google Test, on my same new project, and it also failed to work out-of-the-box with Clang’s STL, referring to the now-obsolete and deleted std::tr1 namespace.
Hm ok. Then when I understand correctly we can close this issue, right?
Cheers
Christian
>
> On Nov 27, 2012, at 12:56, Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> esp @Andrew:
>>
>> isn't this issue:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGCXX-321
>> fixed by your latest patch?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Christian
>>
>> --
>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>> https://www.timeandbill.de
>
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de
Re: LOGCXX-321 fixed?
Posted by Andrew Lazarus <dr...@me.com>.
I think it is more likely that it has been resolved by header re-organization in the Clang version of STL, than by my patches in particular.
I have just started using Google Test, on my same new project, and it also failed to work out-of-the-box with Clang’s STL, referring to the now-obsolete and deleted std::tr1 namespace.
On Nov 27, 2012, at 12:56, Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> esp @Andrew:
>
> isn't this issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGCXX-321
> fixed by your latest patch?
>
> Cheers
> Christian
>
> --
> http://www.grobmeier.de
> https://www.timeandbill.de