You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@continuum.apache.org by Damien Lecan <ml...@dlecan.com> on 2007/09/04 16:32:46 UTC
Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Hello,
I've just installed Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 to replace my old Continuum
1.0.3 instance.
I'm working with MySql instead of embbeded sql server and with Tomcat 5.5.17
Nice new features, but UI is very, very, very slow :(
I followed http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER/Continuum+on+MySQL
and http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER/Continuum+on+Tomcat
for installation.
Everything works fine, but very, very slowly. For example, each item
on the left menu appears one after the other. Same thing when
displaying project group information. Each module name appears one
after the other (25s for a 17 modules project).
MySql database is shared with other Java applications. They work fine,
with expected performances.
What can be the problem ?
Thanks
Damien Lecan
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
Damien Lecan a écrit :
> Hello,
>
>> for http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/projectGroupSummary.action?projectGroupId=9
>> we have 30 modules printed in 7,5s and the page size is 101ko
>>
>> We use the standalone version installed in a vm.
>
> Standalone version is as slow as embedded version in Tomcat :-(
:(
>
> My server is not powerful, but other applications running on it are
> very fast compared to Continuum (Jira, Spring MVC/Struts home-made
> Java applications, Proximity, ...)
>
> Are 7,5s to load a single page an acceptable value for a such product ?
We'll improve performance in 1.2, but I don't think 7,5s is a problem for a such product
Emmanuel
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by olivier lamy <ol...@apache.org>.
Yep it's a change.
2007/9/14, Damien Lecan <ml...@dlecan.com>:
>
> 2007/9/14, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>:
> > You can try the latest snapshot :
> http://maven.zones.apache.org/~continuum/builds/trunk/
>
> Did you change something in database schema ?
>
> I get that when I launch the snapshot :
> com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Unknown column
> 'ELEMENT.ALWAYS_BUILD' in 'field list'
>
> Damien
>
--
Olivier
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Damien Lecan <ml...@dlecan.com>.
2007/9/14, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>:
> yes, some fields are added. We're writing a doc about database migration.
Ok, I will try with a fresh database, I'll migrate later.
Damien
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
yes, some fields are added. We're writing a doc about database migration.
Emmanuel
Damien Lecan a écrit :
> 2007/9/14, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>:
>> You can try the latest snapshot : http://maven.zones.apache.org/~continuum/builds/trunk/
>
> Did you change something in database schema ?
>
> I get that when I launch the snapshot :
> com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Unknown column
> 'ELEMENT.ALWAYS_BUILD' in 'field list'
>
> Damien
>
>
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Damien Lecan <ml...@dlecan.com>.
2007/9/14, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>:
> You can try the latest snapshot : http://maven.zones.apache.org/~continuum/builds/trunk/
Did you change something in database schema ?
I get that when I launch the snapshot :
com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Unknown column
'ELEMENT.ALWAYS_BUILD' in 'field list'
Damien
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
You can try the latest snapshot : http://maven.zones.apache.org/~continuum/builds/trunk/
Emmanuel
Damien Lecan a écrit :
> 2007/9/14, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>:
>> Olivier has done a little patch that improve a lot the rendering.
>> I have a group with 100 projects, before the patch, the page was display in 12s and now it's less than 2s.
>> Can you give a try?
>
> Yes i can !
> How can I do that ? Patch, snapshot ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Damien
>
>
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Damien Lecan <ml...@dlecan.com>.
2007/9/14, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>:
> Olivier has done a little patch that improve a lot the rendering.
> I have a group with 100 projects, before the patch, the page was display in 12s and now it's less than 2s.
> Can you give a try?
Yes i can !
How can I do that ? Patch, snapshot ?
Thanks
Damien
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by olivier lamy <ol...@apache.org>.
Cool.
Thanks for your time on testing.
--
Olivier
2007/9/14, Damien Lecan <ml...@dlecan.com>:
>
> 2007/9/14, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>:
> > Olivier has done a little patch that improve a lot the rendering.
> > I have a group with 100 projects, before the patch, the page was display
> in 12s and now it's less than 2s.
> > Can you give a try?
>
> Incredibly fast ! My now 25 module project page is loaded in ~2,1s.
> Well done, this is performance tuning ;-)
>
> Damien
>
--
Olivier
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Damien Lecan <ml...@dlecan.com>.
2007/9/14, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>:
> Olivier has done a little patch that improve a lot the rendering.
> I have a group with 100 projects, before the patch, the page was display in 12s and now it's less than 2s.
> Can you give a try?
Incredibly fast ! My now 25 module project page is loaded in ~2,1s.
Well done, this is performance tuning ;-)
Damien
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
Olivier has done a little patch that improve a lot the rendering.
I have a group with 100 projects, before the patch, the page was display in 12s and now it's less than 2s.
Can you give a try?
Emmanuel
Damien Lecan a écrit :
>>> Checking of roles takes ~4s. Improvements could be done ?
>> It isn't the roles check that take some seconds but pages aren't the exactly the same for a guest and an admin.
>> If you don't get project group admin or project group developer roles to guest, he can't see some actions/links like build/edit/remove... that require some more webwork cycles
>
> Webwork cycles raise the rendering time by 50%. Something must be
> wrong with Webwork/freemarker.
> I'm managing JSP/Struts, JSP/Spring MVC applications with Acegi to manage roles.
> Displaying or not actions/links... maybe 50 times in a page is not so slow.
>
> Good luck and thank you for the first improvement.
>
> Damien
>
>
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Damien Lecan <ml...@dlecan.com>.
> > Checking of roles takes ~4s. Improvements could be done ?
>
> It isn't the roles check that take some seconds but pages aren't the exactly the same for a guest and an admin.
> If you don't get project group admin or project group developer roles to guest, he can't see some actions/links like build/edit/remove... that require some more webwork cycles
Webwork cycles raise the rendering time by 50%. Something must be
wrong with Webwork/freemarker.
I'm managing JSP/Struts, JSP/Spring MVC applications with Acegi to manage roles.
Displaying or not actions/links... maybe 50 times in a page is not so slow.
Good luck and thank you for the first improvement.
Damien
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by olivier lamy <ol...@apache.org>.
Hi,
I have created the issue : http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1446.
We will fix this for beta-3.
--
Olivier
2007/9/13, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>:
>
>
>
> Damien Lecan a écrit :
> > 2007/9/12, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>:
> >> I'd like you test something about performance.
> >>
> >> As explain in this page (
> http://wiki.opensymphony.com/display/WW/Performance+Tuning), you can
> create a freemarker.properties file under WEB-INF/classes that contains
> 'template_update_delay=60000'
> >> then you extract the template directory from webwork jar to
> WEB-INF/classes
> >> Let us know if it's better with that.
> >
> > Much better than before : the 17 module project page takes now "just"
> > between 7,5s and 11s to load.
> > And all pages are loaded faster.
>
> Cool, I'll look if I can add these changes in the release.
>
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > I noticed something else : pages are loaded much faster as guest than
> > as admin with full roles.
> >
> > For the same 17 module project page, I get the following values
> > (average for 10 loads) :
> > - guest : 7,6s
> > - admin : 11,5s
> >
> > Checking of roles takes ~4s. Improvements could be done ?
>
> It isn't the roles check that take some seconds but pages aren't the
> exactly the same for a guest and an admin.
> If you don't get project group admin or project group developer roles to
> guest, he can't see some actions/links like build/edit/remove... that
> require some more webwork cycles
>
> Emmanuel
>
>
>
--
Olivier
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
Damien Lecan a écrit :
> 2007/9/12, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>:
>> I'd like you test something about performance.
>>
>> As explain in this page (http://wiki.opensymphony.com/display/WW/Performance+Tuning), you can create a freemarker.properties file under WEB-INF/classes that contains 'template_update_delay=60000'
>> then you extract the template directory from webwork jar to WEB-INF/classes
>> Let us know if it's better with that.
>
> Much better than before : the 17 module project page takes now "just"
> between 7,5s and 11s to load.
> And all pages are loaded faster.
Cool, I'll look if I can add these changes in the release.
>
> Thanks
>
> I noticed something else : pages are loaded much faster as guest than
> as admin with full roles.
>
> For the same 17 module project page, I get the following values
> (average for 10 loads) :
> - guest : 7,6s
> - admin : 11,5s
>
> Checking of roles takes ~4s. Improvements could be done ?
It isn't the roles check that take some seconds but pages aren't the exactly the same for a guest and an admin.
If you don't get project group admin or project group developer roles to guest, he can't see some actions/links like build/edit/remove... that require some more webwork cycles
Emmanuel
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Damien Lecan <ml...@dlecan.com>.
2007/9/12, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>:
> I'd like you test something about performance.
>
> As explain in this page (http://wiki.opensymphony.com/display/WW/Performance+Tuning), you can create a freemarker.properties file under WEB-INF/classes that contains 'template_update_delay=60000'
> then you extract the template directory from webwork jar to WEB-INF/classes
> Let us know if it's better with that.
Much better than before : the 17 module project page takes now "just"
between 7,5s and 11s to load.
And all pages are loaded faster.
Thanks
I noticed something else : pages are loaded much faster as guest than
as admin with full roles.
For the same 17 module project page, I get the following values
(average for 10 loads) :
- guest : 7,6s
- admin : 11,5s
Checking of roles takes ~4s. Improvements could be done ?
Damien
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
I'd like you test something about performance.
As explain in this page (http://wiki.opensymphony.com/display/WW/Performance+Tuning), you can create a freemarker.properties file under WEB-INF/classes that contains 'template_update_delay=60000'
then you extract the template directory from webwork jar to WEB-INF/classes
Let us know if it's better with that.
Thanks
Emmanuel
Damien Lecan a écrit :
> Hello,
>
>> for http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/projectGroupSummary.action?projectGroupId=9
>> we have 30 modules printed in 7,5s and the page size is 101ko
>>
>> We use the standalone version installed in a vm.
>
> Standalone version is as slow as embedded version in Tomcat :-(
>
> My server is not powerful, but other applications running on it are
> very fast compared to Continuum (Jira, Spring MVC/Struts home-made
> Java applications, Proximity, ...)
>
> Are 7,5s to load a single page an acceptable value for a such product ?
>
> Damien
>
>
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Damien Lecan <ml...@dlecan.com>.
Hello,
> for http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/projectGroupSummary.action?projectGroupId=9
> we have 30 modules printed in 7,5s and the page size is 101ko
>
> We use the standalone version installed in a vm.
Standalone version is as slow as embedded version in Tomcat :-(
My server is not powerful, but other applications running on it are
very fast compared to Continuum (Jira, Spring MVC/Struts home-made
Java applications, Proximity, ...)
Are 7,5s to load a single page an acceptable value for a such product ?
Damien
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
for http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/projectGroupSummary.action?projectGroupId=9
we have 30 modules printed in 7,5s and the page size is 101ko
We use the standalone version installed in a vm.
Emmanuel
Damien Lecan a écrit :
> 2007/9/11, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>:
>> I don't understand why it is so slow to render the project list because the rendering start with this line:
>>
>> 00:00:03,452 [http-8081-Processor11] DEBUG ServletDispatcherResult - Forwarding to location /WEB-INF/jsp/components/projectSummaryComponent.jsp
>>
>> and end with this line:
>>
>> 00:00:21,213 [http-8081-Processor11] DEBUG ServletDispatcherResult - Forwarding to location /WEB-INF/jsp/components/companyLogo.jsp
>>
>> so it's 18 seconds to print the html, very long because we don't have data to process there. We don't have the hand on this part because the rendering is webwork and extremecomponents work.
>>
>> Can you try with the Continuum standalone version to see if the result is different?
>> What is your jdk?
>
> Resulting page is about 71kb.
>
> I'm using Java 1.5.0_11 under Linux fedora
>
> I'll try asap Continuum as a standalone instance (without Tomcat).
>
> Thanks
>
> Damien
>
>
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Damien Lecan <ml...@dlecan.com>.
2007/9/11, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>:
> I don't understand why it is so slow to render the project list because the rendering start with this line:
>
> 00:00:03,452 [http-8081-Processor11] DEBUG ServletDispatcherResult - Forwarding to location /WEB-INF/jsp/components/projectSummaryComponent.jsp
>
> and end with this line:
>
> 00:00:21,213 [http-8081-Processor11] DEBUG ServletDispatcherResult - Forwarding to location /WEB-INF/jsp/components/companyLogo.jsp
>
> so it's 18 seconds to print the html, very long because we don't have data to process there. We don't have the hand on this part because the rendering is webwork and extremecomponents work.
>
> Can you try with the Continuum standalone version to see if the result is different?
> What is your jdk?
Resulting page is about 71kb.
I'm using Java 1.5.0_11 under Linux fedora
I'll try asap Continuum as a standalone instance (without Tomcat).
Thanks
Damien
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
I don't understand why it is so slow to render the project list because the rendering start with this line:
00:00:03,452 [http-8081-Processor11] DEBUG ServletDispatcherResult - Forwarding to location /WEB-INF/jsp/components/projectSummaryComponent.jsp
and end with this line:
00:00:21,213 [http-8081-Processor11] DEBUG ServletDispatcherResult - Forwarding to location /WEB-INF/jsp/components/companyLogo.jsp
so it's 18 seconds to print the html, very long because we don't have data to process there. We don't have the hand on this part because the rendering is webwork and extremecomponents work.
Can you try with the Continuum standalone version to see if the result is different?
What is your jdk?
Emmanuel
Damien Lecan a écrit :
>> ok, switch all logs levels to DEBUG by switching the threshold from INFO to DEBUG
>
> Log file is attached to this email.
>
> There are a lot of logs about templates, permissions ...
>
> Damien
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Damien Lecan <ml...@dlecan.com>.
> ok, switch all logs levels to DEBUG by switching the threshold from INFO to DEBUG
Log file is attached to this email.
There are a lot of logs about templates, permissions ...
Damien
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
Damien Lecan a écrit :
>>> I could activate some special debug log or anything else which could help ?
>> you can set the log level of JPOX* and SQL to DEBUG in apps/continuum/webapp/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/plexus/application.xml
>
> I did that. I load page "Project Group Summary" of a 17 module project.
>
>
> For a request that begins at 00:00:00 and ends at 00:00:18, I get that :
>
> 00:00:01,692 [http-8081-Processor9] DEBUG General - Implementation
> creator not configured. Due to that, the persistence of interfaces was
> disabled!
>
> ... lot of logs
>
> 00:00:02,870 [http-8081-Processor9] DEBUG JDO - Persistence Manager
> "org.jpox.PersistenceManagerImpl@154c18c" closed
>
> 2 sec to retrieve data.
>
> But what happens between 00:00:02,870 and 00:00:18 ?
>
> More logs to enable ?
ok, switch all logs levels to DEBUG by switching the threshold from INFO to DEBUG
Emmanuel
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Damien Lecan <ml...@dlecan.com>.
> > I could activate some special debug log or anything else which could help ?
>
> you can set the log level of JPOX* and SQL to DEBUG in apps/continuum/webapp/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/plexus/application.xml
I did that. I load page "Project Group Summary" of a 17 module project.
For a request that begins at 00:00:00 and ends at 00:00:18, I get that :
00:00:01,692 [http-8081-Processor9] DEBUG General - Implementation
creator not configured. Due to that, the persistence of interfaces was
disabled!
... lot of logs
00:00:02,870 [http-8081-Processor9] DEBUG JDO - Persistence Manager
"org.jpox.PersistenceManagerImpl@154c18c" closed
2 sec to retrieve data.
But what happens between 00:00:02,870 and 00:00:18 ?
More logs to enable ?
Thanks
Damien
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
Damien Lecan a écrit :
> 2007/9/10, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>:
>> Continuum can't be compared to Archiva because in Continuum
>> pages we have lot of db queries.
>
> This server is also running Jira (same local MySql server, same Tomcat
> instance), without a such slowness.
> Are you interested in knowing what's happening on my server ?
sure.
>
> I could activate some special debug log or anything else which could help ?
you can set the log level of JPOX* and SQL to DEBUG in apps/continuum/webapp/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/plexus/application.xml
Emmanuel
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Damien Lecan <ml...@dlecan.com>.
2007/9/10, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>:
> Continuum can't be compared to Archiva because in Continuum
> pages we have lot of db queries.
This server is also running Jira (same local MySql server, same Tomcat
instance), without a such slowness.
Are you interested in knowing what's happening on my server ?
I could activate some special debug log or anything else which could help ?
Damien
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
Continuum can't be compared to Archiva because in Continuum pages we have lot of db queries.
Emmanuel
Damien Lecan a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I set up Archiva 1.0-beta-1 with the same configuration, and
> performances are quite better than Continuum one (2-3s to display a
> page).
>
> How can I understand what happen to my Continuum instance ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Damien Lecan
>
>
> 2007/9/4, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>:
>> We know that 1.1 is a little slower than 1.0.3 because lot of new request and full security added but 25s for 17 modules isn't a normal perf result
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>> Mrinal Mukherjee a écrit :
>>> Same problem with me. Slow UI. I had this problem as soon as I upgraded to
>>> the newer version of continuum. I thought it was a problem in my system, but
>>> now I know its something to do with the new version of continuum.
>>>
>>> Mrinal
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Justin Deoliveira [mailto:jdeolive@openplans.org]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 5:49 PM
>>> To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
>>>
>>> I am using derby out of the box and noticed the same slowdown. I don't
>>> have any metrics to back it up but its definitely noticeably slower.
>>>
>>> -Justin
>>>
>>> Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>>>> Damien Lecan a écrit :
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've just installed Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 to replace my old Continuum
>>>>> 1.0.3 instance.
>>>>> I'm working with MySql instead of embbeded sql server and with Tomcat
>>>>> 5.5.17
>>>>>
>>>>> Nice new features, but UI is very, very, very slow :(
>>>>>
>>>>> I followed
>>>>> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER/Continuum+on+MySQL
>>>>> and http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER/Continuum+on+Tomcat
>>>>> for installation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Everything works fine, but very, very slowly. For example, each item
>>>>> on the left menu appears one after the other. Same thing when
>>>>> displaying project group information. Each module name appears one
>>>>> after the other (25s for a 17 modules project).
>>>> 25s for 17 modules??? With embedded derby database we have better
>>>> performance (http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/) and all appears
>>>> at the same time
>>>> Are you sure you use the right jdbc driver?
>>>>
>>>>> MySql database is shared with other Java applications. They work fine,
>>>>> with expected performances.
>>>>>
>>>>> What can be the problem ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Damien Lecan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> !DSPAM:4007,46dd7d79203981439371379!
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Damien Lecan <ml...@dlecan.com>.
Hello,
I set up Archiva 1.0-beta-1 with the same configuration, and
performances are quite better than Continuum one (2-3s to display a
page).
How can I understand what happen to my Continuum instance ?
Thanks
Damien Lecan
2007/9/4, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>:
> We know that 1.1 is a little slower than 1.0.3 because lot of new request and full security added but 25s for 17 modules isn't a normal perf result
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Mrinal Mukherjee a écrit :
> > Same problem with me. Slow UI. I had this problem as soon as I upgraded to
> > the newer version of continuum. I thought it was a problem in my system, but
> > now I know its something to do with the new version of continuum.
> >
> > Mrinal
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Justin Deoliveira [mailto:jdeolive@openplans.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 5:49 PM
> > To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
> >
> > I am using derby out of the box and noticed the same slowdown. I don't
> > have any metrics to back it up but its definitely noticeably slower.
> >
> > -Justin
> >
> > Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> >>
> >> Damien Lecan a écrit :
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I've just installed Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 to replace my old Continuum
> >>> 1.0.3 instance.
> >>> I'm working with MySql instead of embbeded sql server and with Tomcat
> >>> 5.5.17
> >>>
> >>> Nice new features, but UI is very, very, very slow :(
> >>>
> >>> I followed
> >>> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER/Continuum+on+MySQL
> >>> and http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER/Continuum+on+Tomcat
> >>> for installation.
> >>>
> >>> Everything works fine, but very, very slowly. For example, each item
> >>> on the left menu appears one after the other. Same thing when
> >>> displaying project group information. Each module name appears one
> >>> after the other (25s for a 17 modules project).
> >> 25s for 17 modules??? With embedded derby database we have better
> >> performance (http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/) and all appears
> >> at the same time
> >> Are you sure you use the right jdbc driver?
> >>
> >>> MySql database is shared with other Java applications. They work fine,
> >>> with expected performances.
> >>>
> >>> What can be the problem ?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Damien Lecan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> !DSPAM:4007,46dd7d79203981439371379!
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
We know that 1.1 is a little slower than 1.0.3 because lot of new request and full security added but 25s for 17 modules isn't a normal perf result
Emmanuel
Mrinal Mukherjee a écrit :
> Same problem with me. Slow UI. I had this problem as soon as I upgraded to
> the newer version of continuum. I thought it was a problem in my system, but
> now I know its something to do with the new version of continuum.
>
> Mrinal
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin Deoliveira [mailto:jdeolive@openplans.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 5:49 PM
> To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
>
> I am using derby out of the box and noticed the same slowdown. I don't
> have any metrics to back it up but its definitely noticeably slower.
>
> -Justin
>
> Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>>
>> Damien Lecan a écrit :
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I've just installed Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 to replace my old Continuum
>>> 1.0.3 instance.
>>> I'm working with MySql instead of embbeded sql server and with Tomcat
>>> 5.5.17
>>>
>>> Nice new features, but UI is very, very, very slow :(
>>>
>>> I followed
>>> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER/Continuum+on+MySQL
>>> and http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER/Continuum+on+Tomcat
>>> for installation.
>>>
>>> Everything works fine, but very, very slowly. For example, each item
>>> on the left menu appears one after the other. Same thing when
>>> displaying project group information. Each module name appears one
>>> after the other (25s for a 17 modules project).
>> 25s for 17 modules??? With embedded derby database we have better
>> performance (http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/) and all appears
>> at the same time
>> Are you sure you use the right jdbc driver?
>>
>>> MySql database is shared with other Java applications. They work fine,
>>> with expected performances.
>>>
>>> What can be the problem ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Damien Lecan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> !DSPAM:4007,46dd7d79203981439371379!
>>
>
>
RE: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Mrinal Mukherjee <mu...@funambol.com>.
Same problem with me. Slow UI. I had this problem as soon as I upgraded to
the newer version of continuum. I thought it was a problem in my system, but
now I know its something to do with the new version of continuum.
Mrinal
-----Original Message-----
From: Justin Deoliveira [mailto:jdeolive@openplans.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 5:49 PM
To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
I am using derby out of the box and noticed the same slowdown. I don't
have any metrics to back it up but its definitely noticeably slower.
-Justin
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>
>
> Damien Lecan a écrit :
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've just installed Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 to replace my old Continuum
>> 1.0.3 instance.
>> I'm working with MySql instead of embbeded sql server and with Tomcat
>> 5.5.17
>>
>> Nice new features, but UI is very, very, very slow :(
>>
>> I followed
>> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER/Continuum+on+MySQL
>> and http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER/Continuum+on+Tomcat
>> for installation.
>>
>> Everything works fine, but very, very slowly. For example, each item
>> on the left menu appears one after the other. Same thing when
>> displaying project group information. Each module name appears one
>> after the other (25s for a 17 modules project).
>
> 25s for 17 modules??? With embedded derby database we have better
> performance (http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/) and all appears
> at the same time
> Are you sure you use the right jdbc driver?
>
>>
>> MySql database is shared with other Java applications. They work fine,
>> with expected performances.
>>
>> What can be the problem ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Damien Lecan
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> !DSPAM:4007,46dd7d79203981439371379!
>
--
Justin Deoliveira
The Open Planning Project
http://topp.openplans.org
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.12/979 - Release Date: 8/29/2007
8:21 PM
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.12/979 - Release Date: 8/29/2007
8:21 PM
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Justin Deoliveira <jd...@openplans.org>.
I am using derby out of the box and noticed the same slowdown. I don't
have any metrics to back it up but its definitely noticeably slower.
-Justin
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>
>
> Damien Lecan a écrit :
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've just installed Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 to replace my old Continuum
>> 1.0.3 instance.
>> I'm working with MySql instead of embbeded sql server and with Tomcat
>> 5.5.17
>>
>> Nice new features, but UI is very, very, very slow :(
>>
>> I followed
>> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER/Continuum+on+MySQL
>> and http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER/Continuum+on+Tomcat
>> for installation.
>>
>> Everything works fine, but very, very slowly. For example, each item
>> on the left menu appears one after the other. Same thing when
>> displaying project group information. Each module name appears one
>> after the other (25s for a 17 modules project).
>
> 25s for 17 modules??? With embedded derby database we have better
> performance (http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/) and all appears
> at the same time
> Are you sure you use the right jdbc driver?
>
>>
>> MySql database is shared with other Java applications. They work fine,
>> with expected performances.
>>
>> What can be the problem ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Damien Lecan
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> !DSPAM:4007,46dd7d79203981439371379!
>
--
Justin Deoliveira
The Open Planning Project
http://topp.openplans.org
Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
Damien Lecan a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I've just installed Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 to replace my old Continuum
> 1.0.3 instance.
> I'm working with MySql instead of embbeded sql server and with Tomcat 5.5.17
>
> Nice new features, but UI is very, very, very slow :(
>
> I followed http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER/Continuum+on+MySQL
> and http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER/Continuum+on+Tomcat
> for installation.
>
> Everything works fine, but very, very slowly. For example, each item
> on the left menu appears one after the other. Same thing when
> displaying project group information. Each module name appears one
> after the other (25s for a 17 modules project).
25s for 17 modules??? With embedded derby database we have better performance (http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/) and all appears at the same time
Are you sure you use the right jdbc driver?
>
> MySql database is shared with other Java applications. They work fine,
> with expected performances.
>
> What can be the problem ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Damien Lecan
>
>
>