You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@struts.apache.org by netsql <ne...@pointcast.com> on 2006/01/16 15:29:02 UTC
ot: more on wicket
http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t60786.html
.V
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
Re: more on wicket
Posted by Nick Heudecker <nh...@gmail.com>.
The rawInput variable is set in the FormComponent when the validation
starts. If validation succeeds, rawInput is set to an internal constant and
processing continues. If validation fails, the rawInput for each
FormComponent is still available and is rendered on the input page.
As far as adding an IntegerValidator to a TextField, it's pretty simple:
TextField age = new TextField("age");
age.add(IntegerValidator.range(0, 130));
add(age);
The last call adds the TextField to the Form object.
Nick, Wicket does look interesting, but I'm curious, how does Wicket
> handle preserving the user's form input when you need to return the user
> back to the form when validation fails? For example, if my eventual POJO
> needs to accept an Integer "age" but the user enters in 34f6 for age on
> the JSP form, how does Wicket handle this?
>
Re: more on wicket
Posted by Rick Reumann <ri...@gmail.com>.
Nick Heudecker wrote:
>
> I've built a number of Struts applications and
> consider myself an expert with it, but it's unlikely I'd build another
> application with Struts while Wicket is available.
>
>
Nick, Wicket does look interesting, but I'm curious, how does Wicket
handle preserving the user's form input when you need to return the user
back to the form when validation fails? For example, if my eventual POJO
needs to accept an Integer "age" but the user enters in 34f6 for age on
the JSP form, how does Wicket handle this?
--
Rick
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
Re: more on wicket
Posted by Nick Heudecker <nh...@gmail.com>.
> ...which are currently configured by what, XML? Doesn't this remove
> some of the zero-conf advantages? And, there's going to have to be a
> way to configure it in 1.2 somehow also. I guess "almost zero
> configuration" isn't as catchy? :-)
>
There is configuration, but it's minor and contained in the Application
class. Still no XML. If you really want to use XML to configure the
Application, the recent Spring integration allows you to do that.
Regarding the problem domain issue of Wicket, I've done a lot with it so far
and haven't had any problems solving real issues with it, with much less
hair-pulling than Struts. I've built a number of Struts applications and
consider myself an expert with it, but it's unlikely I'd build another
application with Struts while Wicket is available.
Re: more on wicket
Posted by Ed Griebel <ed...@gmail.com>.
On 1/16/06, Nick Heudecker <nh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You can create aliases in the current version to provide shorthand names for
> pages. Wicket 1.2 will allow you to mount pages at specified URLs, which
> should get around this problem.
...which are currently configured by what, XML? Doesn't this remove
some of the zero-conf advantages? And, there's going to have to be a
way to configure it in 1.2 somehow also. I guess "almost zero
configuration" isn't as catchy? :-)
All this Wicket/RoR/zero-conf stuff (and SilverStream too, if anyone
remembers that) reminds me of Visual Basic back in the day: it's a
very productive framework if your problem is within the class of
problems that were envisioned, but once you need to step outside that
box, you're screwed as you are spending more time fighting with the
framework than problem domain coding.
-ed
>
> On 1/16/06, David G. Friedman <hu...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >
> > More wicket articles? I'm getting a message here: I bet you wish Struts
> > Action 2.0 was really Struts "Wicket" 2.0. LOL.
> > Personally, I had trouble with how it implements zero configuration files
> > and how the URLs look freaky in the current
> > version.
> >
> > Regards,
> > David Friedman / humble@ix.netcom.com
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: news [mailto:news@sea.gmane.org]On Behalf Of netsql
> > Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 9:29 AM
> > To: user@struts.apache.org
> > Subject: ot: more on wicket
> >
> > http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t60786.html
> >
> > .V
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
--
"The greatest tyrannies are always perpetrated in the name of the
noblest causes." Thomas Paine
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety" - Benjamin
Franklin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
Re: more on wicket
Posted by Nick Heudecker <nh...@gmail.com>.
You can create aliases in the current version to provide shorthand names for
pages. Wicket 1.2 will allow you to mount pages at specified URLs, which
should get around this problem.
On 1/16/06, David G. Friedman <hu...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> More wicket articles? I'm getting a message here: I bet you wish Struts
> Action 2.0 was really Struts "Wicket" 2.0. LOL.
> Personally, I had trouble with how it implements zero configuration files
> and how the URLs look freaky in the current
> version.
>
> Regards,
> David Friedman / humble@ix.netcom.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: news [mailto:news@sea.gmane.org]On Behalf Of netsql
> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 9:29 AM
> To: user@struts.apache.org
> Subject: ot: more on wicket
>
> http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t60786.html
>
> .V
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
RE: more on wicket
Posted by "David G. Friedman" <hu...@ix.netcom.com>.
More wicket articles? I'm getting a message here: I bet you wish Struts Action 2.0 was really Struts "Wicket" 2.0. LOL.
Personally, I had trouble with how it implements zero configuration files and how the URLs look freaky in the current
version.
Regards,
David Friedman / humble@ix.netcom.com
-----Original Message-----
From: news [mailto:news@sea.gmane.org]On Behalf Of netsql
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 9:29 AM
To: user@struts.apache.org
Subject: ot: more on wicket
http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t60786.html
.V
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org