You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by Jacopo Cappellato <ti...@sastau.it> on 2007/06/24 08:34:03 UTC
How to render an empty header in list form widgets
Right now, in many form definition, in order to display an empty header,
the following title is set:
title=""
I'd like to change the behavior of the framework to suppress (don't
create a cell) the header if the above title is set; is it ok if I
change the existing form definitions in the following way?
title="${uiLabelMap.CommonEmptyHeader}"
where CommonEmptyHeader=
is blank
What do you think?
Jacopo
Re: How to render an empty header in list form widgets
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
I can't see any problems with this changes. But is that not already commited in rev. 550173 ?
Jacques
De : "Jacopo Cappellato" <ti...@sastau.it>
> Right now, in many form definition, in order to display an empty header,
> the following title is set:
>
> title=""
>
> I'd like to change the behavior of the framework to suppress (don't
> create a cell) the header if the above title is set; is it ok if I
> change the existing form definitions in the following way?
>
> title="${uiLabelMap.CommonEmptyHeader}"
>
> where CommonEmptyHeader=
> is blank
>
> What do you think?
>
> Jacopo
Re: How to render an empty header in list form widgets
Posted by Jacopo Cappellato <ti...@sastau.it>.
All in all, I think that replacing all the occurencies of title="" with
title="${uiLabelMap.CommonEmptyHeader}" is a good idea, and so I've
committed this change in rev. 550173
Jacopo
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> Right now, in many form definition, in order to display an empty header,
> the following title is set:
>
> title=""
>
> I'd like to change the behavior of the framework to suppress (don't
> create a cell) the header if the above title is set; is it ok if I
> change the existing form definitions in the following way?
>
> title="${uiLabelMap.CommonEmptyHeader}"
>
> where CommonEmptyHeader=
> is blank
>
> What do you think?
>
> Jacopo