Silly question: why have native-standalone vs standalone example conf DIRs?

[Aaron <aa...@gmail.com>]

If by default, native-mapping for tserver is "true" by default?

I know there start-up memory settings are different in accumulo-env.sh,
but, i would think that for non-native mapping, you'd have in the
accumulo-site.xml the configure tserver.memory.aps.native.enabled = false

Or am I completely missing something?

Re: Silly question: why have native-standalone vs standalone example conf DIRs?

[Corey Nolet <cj...@gmail.com>]

You are correct. Include as an attachment on the ticket.
On May 29, 2013 7:48 PM, "Aaron" <aa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok, is the best way just to add as an attachment?  I did see that it got
> rolled into a larger "configurator" issue..just upload the attachment to
> the ticket?  First time submitting patch for Accumulo, wasn't 100% sure
> what you guys wanted.
>
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Aaron Glahe <aa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ok, is the best way just to add as an attachment?  I did see that it got
>> rolled into a larger "configurator" issue..
>>
>>
>> On May 29, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Billie Rinaldi <bi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks!  Feel free to submit a patch.  We like patches.
>>
>> Billie
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Aaron <aa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Done...also, not 100% sure if you want, I can quickly update the files,
>>> and submit a patch.  Also, try and figure out a unit test to confirm that
>>> native-map isn't being used.  Let me know.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Aaron Glahe <aa...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> No problem.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On May 28, 2013, at 2:50 PM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If you don't have the native libraries available, then they will just
>>>> fail over to the non-native implementation. But that does make a lot of
>>>> sense. Do you mind putting in a ticket for this improvement?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Aaron <aa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If by default, native-mapping for tserver is "true" by default?
>>>>>
>>>>> I know there start-up memory settings are different in
>>>>> accumulo-env.sh, but, i would think that for non-native mapping, you'd have
>>>>> in the accumulo-site.xml the configure tserver.memory.aps.native.enabled =
>>>>> false
>>>>>
>>>>> Or am I completely missing something?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: Silly question: why have native-standalone vs standalone example conf DIRs?

[Aaron <aa...@gmail.com>]

Ok, is the best way just to add as an attachment?  I did see that it got
rolled into a larger "configurator" issue..just upload the attachment to
the ticket?  First time submitting patch for Accumulo, wasn't 100% sure
what you guys wanted.


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Aaron Glahe <aa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok, is the best way just to add as an attachment?  I did see that it got
> rolled into a larger "configurator" issue..
>
>
> On May 29, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Billie Rinaldi <bi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Thanks!  Feel free to submit a patch.  We like patches.
>
> Billie
>
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Aaron <aa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Done...also, not 100% sure if you want, I can quickly update the files,
>> and submit a patch.  Also, try and figure out a unit test to confirm that
>> native-map isn't being used.  Let me know.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Aaron Glahe <aa...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> No problem.
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 28, 2013, at 2:50 PM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> If you don't have the native libraries available, then they will just
>>> fail over to the non-native implementation. But that does make a lot of
>>> sense. Do you mind putting in a ticket for this improvement?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Aaron <aa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If by default, native-mapping for tserver is "true" by default?
>>>>
>>>> I know there start-up memory settings are different in accumulo-env.sh,
>>>> but, i would think that for non-native mapping, you'd have in the
>>>> accumulo-site.xml the configure tserver.memory.aps.native.enabled = false
>>>>
>>>> Or am I completely missing something?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Re: Silly question: why have native-standalone vs standalone example conf DIRs?

[Billie Rinaldi <bi...@gmail.com>]

Thanks!  Feel free to submit a patch.  We like patches.

Billie


On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Aaron <aa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Done...also, not 100% sure if you want, I can quickly update the files,
> and submit a patch.  Also, try and figure out a unit test to confirm that
> native-map isn't being used.  Let me know.
>
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Aaron Glahe <aa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> No problem.
>>
>>
>> On May 28, 2013, at 2:50 PM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> If you don't have the native libraries available, then they will just
>> fail over to the non-native implementation. But that does make a lot of
>> sense. Do you mind putting in a ticket for this improvement?
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Aaron <aa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If by default, native-mapping for tserver is "true" by default?
>>>
>>> I know there start-up memory settings are different in accumulo-env.sh,
>>> but, i would think that for non-native mapping, you'd have in the
>>> accumulo-site.xml the configure tserver.memory.aps.native.enabled = false
>>>
>>> Or am I completely missing something?
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Re: Silly question: why have native-standalone vs standalone example conf DIRs?

[Aaron <aa...@gmail.com>]

Done...also, not 100% sure if you want, I can quickly update the files, and
submit a patch.  Also, try and figure out a unit test to confirm that
native-map isn't being used.  Let me know.


On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Aaron Glahe <aa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> No problem.
>
>
> On May 28, 2013, at 2:50 PM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> If you don't have the native libraries available, then they will just fail
> over to the non-native implementation. But that does make a lot of sense.
> Do you mind putting in a ticket for this improvement?
>
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Aaron <aa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If by default, native-mapping for tserver is "true" by default?
>>
>> I know there start-up memory settings are different in accumulo-env.sh,
>> but, i would think that for non-native mapping, you'd have in the
>> accumulo-site.xml the configure tserver.memory.aps.native.enabled = false
>>
>> Or am I completely missing something?
>>
>
>
>

Re: Silly question: why have native-standalone vs standalone example conf DIRs?

[Aaron Glahe <aa...@gmail.com>]

No problem.


On May 28, 2013, at 2:50 PM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:

> If you don't have the native libraries available, then they will just fail over to the non-native implementation. But that does make a lot of sense. Do you mind putting in a ticket for this improvement?
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Aaron <aa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If by default, native-mapping for tserver is "true" by default?
> 
> I know there start-up memory settings are different in accumulo-env.sh, but, i would think that for non-native mapping, you'd have in the accumulo-site.xml the configure tserver.memory.aps.native.enabled = false
> 
> Or am I completely missing something?
> 

Re: Silly question: why have native-standalone vs standalone example conf DIRs?

[John Vines <vi...@apache.org>]

If you don't have the native libraries available, then they will just fail
over to the non-native implementation. But that does make a lot of sense.
Do you mind putting in a ticket for this improvement?


On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Aaron <aa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If by default, native-mapping for tserver is "true" by default?
>
> I know there start-up memory settings are different in accumulo-env.sh,
> but, i would think that for non-native mapping, you'd have in the
> accumulo-site.xml the configure tserver.memory.aps.native.enabled = false
>
> Or am I completely missing something?
>