You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by "Franklin, Matthew B." <mf...@mitre.org> on 2012/01/12 15:16:50 UTC
[1 IPMC VOTE NEEDED] [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
We still need to get one more IPMC vote to close this vote. If someone could take a look, it would be greatly appreciated.
-Matt
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfranklin@mitre.org]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 8:03 AM
>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfranklin@mitre.org]
>>Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 8:45 AM
>>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>Cc: rave-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: sebb [mailto:sebbaz@gmail.com]
>>>Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 8:21 AM
>>>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
>>>
>>>On 9 January 2012 13:09, Franklin, Matthew B. <mf...@mitre.org>
>>wrote:
>>>> Does my answer below suffice? It would be nice to close this vote out
>one
>>>way or another....
>>>>
>>>
>>>The answer describes what happened.
>>>However, it does not fix the problem, which is that the end-user sees
>>>a file with conflicting information.
>>
>>Thanks. This is what I was looking for, so that we can have the discussion as
>to
>>whether or not to cancel the release (we won't do a re-release).
>>
>>>
>>>Not a blocker, but you may find it takes less time overall to fix the
>>>issue before release rather than dealing with user queries afterwards.
>>>
>>>It may also lessen confidence in the release: if there is such an
>>>obvious error, what other errors are lurking?
>>
>>While I agree that it doesn't look great, the CHANGELOG is distributed with
>>the source release and is probably not viewed as much as the release notes
>>sent out with the announcement (which will be the JIRA list I linked). I will
>>take this back to our dev list, but if they don't see it as a blocker, would you
>be
>>comfortable voting +1?
>
>The community was presented with the issue and via lazy consensus agreed
>to move forward with the release, even though the CHANGELOG file is
>incorrect. We still need 1 final IPMC vote to release.
>
>[ Community discussion on proceeding:
>http://markmail.org/message/tp5nyqh24tdpybw6 ]
>
>>
>>>
>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfranklin@mitre.org]
>>>>>Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 12:19 PM
>>>>>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
>>>>>
>>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>>From: sebb [mailto:sebbaz@gmail.com]
>>>>>>Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:06 AM
>>>>>>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On 28 December 2011 19:15, Franklin, Matthew B.
>><mf...@mitre.org>
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>> This is the fifth incubator release for Apache Rave, with the artifacts
>>>being
>>>>>>versioned as 0.6-incubating.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We are requesting at least one additional IPMC member vote, as we
>>>have
>>>>>>received 2 binding IPMC +1 votes during the release voting on rave-dev
>-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> VOTE: http://s.apache.org/Czr
>>>>>>> RESULT: http://s.apache.org/yIQ
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IPMC member votes from the rave-dev list:
>>>>>>> Ate Douma: +1
>>>>>>> Ross Gardler: +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Release notes:
>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rave/tags/0.6-
>>>>>>incubating/CHANGELOG
>>>>>
>>>>>Apparently, I didn't commit back the CHANGELOG for 0.6 . Here is the
>>issue
>>>>>list from JIRA
>>>>>
>>>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=1231
>1
>>2
>>>90
>>>>>&version=12317563
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>which says:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Release Notes - Rave - Version 0.5-INCUBATING
>>>>>>
>>>>>>So what was changed for 0.6?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SVN source tag (r1208867):
>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rave/tags/0.6-
>incubating/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maven staging repos:
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherave-
>>>278/
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherave-
>>>279/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Source release:
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherave-
>>>>>>278/org/apache/rave/rave-project/0.6-incubating/rave-project-0.6-
>>>>>>incubating-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Binary releases
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/rave/0.6-
>>>incubating/apache-
>>>>>>rave-0.6-incubating-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/rave/0.6-
>>>incubating/apache-
>>>>>>rave-0.6-incubating-bin.zip
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> PGP release keys:
>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rave/KEYS
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Vote open for 72 hours.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-
>help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [1 IPMC VOTE NEEDED] [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
On 01/17/2012 10:41 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Ate Douma<at...@douma.nu> wrote:
>> On 01/13/2012 09:53 AM, ant elder wrote:
>>>
>>> I've had a look, the only issue i see is I don't think the NOTICE file
>>> in the binary distribution is correct as it has many things which i
>>> expect are not required. When we last discussed this on general@ we
>>> said this is not strictly a blocking problem, so
>>>
>>> +1
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the review and vote ant, much appreciated.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> but i think you should do a complete review of whats in the NOTICE
>>> file with your mentors and remove everything which doesn't need to be
>>> there.
>>
>> I'm curious what in your opinion doesn't need to be in the NOTICE file.
>> I might have missed some recent discussions on this topic here, but AFAIK
>> all those notices are required.
>> Or did the guidelines really change dramatically recently?
>>
>
> See this email [1] for an answer to a similar question, also there is
> now a definition of required third party notices at [2].
>
> In a nutshell, very few things actually require mention in the NOTICE
> file, and best not to unless there is a reason to.
Thanks ant,
I've been going through my backlog of still unread general@ list messages since
end of November last night, which I didn't had time to look at before. So I did
find the long, very long, discussion(s) about it.
I can't say it is 100% clear yet and to me it seems like the 'rules' haven't
been 'formalized' or 'codified' properly yet.
To me [2] by itself doesn't explain it good enough at least.
But reading through the whole mail thread(s) does help.
At any way, I think I now understand the arguments *why* we should not have
unnecessary notices: "to keep the burden as low as possible for down stream (re)
distributers as they are required to retain our NOTICE file". Right?
For following releases of Apache Rave I'll re-evaluate our NOTICE file to check
if we actually have unnecessary (not asked for) notices which we can remove then.
Thanks for the heads-up,
Ate
>
> ...ant
>
> [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201111.mbox/%3CCAJO%2BUbvDfOib7FnQpJPtVcMJKDvBPRHpAG4%3DbEO3Vmy4w4reFA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> [2] http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#required-third-party-notices
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [1 IPMC VOTE NEEDED] [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
On 01/17/2012 10:41 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Ate Douma<at...@douma.nu> wrote:
>> On 01/13/2012 09:53 AM, ant elder wrote:
>>>
>>> I've had a look, the only issue i see is I don't think the NOTICE file
>>> in the binary distribution is correct as it has many things which i
>>> expect are not required. When we last discussed this on general@ we
>>> said this is not strictly a blocking problem, so
>>>
>>> +1
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the review and vote ant, much appreciated.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> but i think you should do a complete review of whats in the NOTICE
>>> file with your mentors and remove everything which doesn't need to be
>>> there.
>>
>> I'm curious what in your opinion doesn't need to be in the NOTICE file.
>> I might have missed some recent discussions on this topic here, but AFAIK
>> all those notices are required.
>> Or did the guidelines really change dramatically recently?
>>
>
> See this email [1] for an answer to a similar question, also there is
> now a definition of required third party notices at [2].
>
> In a nutshell, very few things actually require mention in the NOTICE
> file, and best not to unless there is a reason to.
Thanks ant,
I've been going through my backlog of still unread general@ list messages since
end of November last night, which I didn't had time to look at before. So I did
find the long, very long, discussion(s) about it.
I can't say it is 100% clear yet and to me it seems like the 'rules' haven't
been 'formalized' or 'codified' properly yet.
To me [2] by itself doesn't explain it good enough at least.
But reading through the whole mail thread(s) does help.
At any way, I think I now understand the arguments *why* we should not have
unnecessary notices: "to keep the burden as low as possible for down stream (re)
distributers as they are required to retain our NOTICE file". Right?
For following releases of Apache Rave I'll re-evaluate our NOTICE file to check
if we actually have unnecessary (not asked for) notices which we can remove then.
Thanks for the heads-up,
Ate
>
> ...ant
>
> [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201111.mbox/%3CCAJO%2BUbvDfOib7FnQpJPtVcMJKDvBPRHpAG4%3DbEO3Vmy4w4reFA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> [2] http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#required-third-party-notices
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
Re: [1 IPMC VOTE NEEDED] [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu> wrote:
> On 01/13/2012 09:53 AM, ant elder wrote:
>>
>> I've had a look, the only issue i see is I don't think the NOTICE file
>> in the binary distribution is correct as it has many things which i
>> expect are not required. When we last discussed this on general@ we
>> said this is not strictly a blocking problem, so
>>
>> +1
>
>
> Thanks for the review and vote ant, much appreciated.
>
>
>>
>> but i think you should do a complete review of whats in the NOTICE
>> file with your mentors and remove everything which doesn't need to be
>> there.
>
> I'm curious what in your opinion doesn't need to be in the NOTICE file.
> I might have missed some recent discussions on this topic here, but AFAIK
> all those notices are required.
> Or did the guidelines really change dramatically recently?
>
See this email [1] for an answer to a similar question, also there is
now a definition of required third party notices at [2].
In a nutshell, very few things actually require mention in the NOTICE
file, and best not to unless there is a reason to.
...ant
[1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201111.mbox/%3CCAJO%2BUbvDfOib7FnQpJPtVcMJKDvBPRHpAG4%3DbEO3Vmy4w4reFA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
[2] http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#required-third-party-notices
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [1 IPMC VOTE NEEDED] [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
On 01/13/2012 09:53 AM, ant elder wrote:
> I've had a look, the only issue i see is I don't think the NOTICE file
> in the binary distribution is correct as it has many things which i
> expect are not required. When we last discussed this on general@ we
> said this is not strictly a blocking problem, so
>
> +1
Thanks for the review and vote ant, much appreciated.
>
> but i think you should do a complete review of whats in the NOTICE
> file with your mentors and remove everything which doesn't need to be
> there.
I'm curious what in your opinion doesn't need to be in the NOTICE file.
I might have missed some recent discussions on this topic here, but AFAIK all
those notices are required.
Or did the guidelines really change dramatically recently?
Thanks, Ate
>
> ...ant
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
> <mf...@mitre.org> wrote:
>> We still need to get one more IPMC vote to close this vote. If someone could take a look, it would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> -Matt
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfranklin@mitre.org]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 8:03 AM
>>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfranklin@mitre.org]
>>>> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 8:45 AM
>>>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Cc: rave-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: sebb [mailto:sebbaz@gmail.com]
>>>>> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 8:21 AM
>>>>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9 January 2012 13:09, Franklin, Matthew B.<mf...@mitre.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Does my answer below suffice? It would be nice to close this vote out
>>> one
>>>>> way or another....
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The answer describes what happened.
>>>>> However, it does not fix the problem, which is that the end-user sees
>>>>> a file with conflicting information.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks. This is what I was looking for, so that we can have the discussion as
>>> to
>>>> whether or not to cancel the release (we won't do a re-release).
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Not a blocker, but you may find it takes less time overall to fix the
>>>>> issue before release rather than dealing with user queries afterwards.
>>>>>
>>>>> It may also lessen confidence in the release: if there is such an
>>>>> obvious error, what other errors are lurking?
>>>>
>>>> While I agree that it doesn't look great, the CHANGELOG is distributed with
>>>> the source release and is probably not viewed as much as the release notes
>>>> sent out with the announcement (which will be the JIRA list I linked). I will
>>>> take this back to our dev list, but if they don't see it as a blocker, would you
>>> be
>>>> comfortable voting +1?
>>>
>>> The community was presented with the issue and via lazy consensus agreed
>>> to move forward with the release, even though the CHANGELOG file is
>>> incorrect. We still need 1 final IPMC vote to release.
>>>
>>> [ Community discussion on proceeding:
>>> http://markmail.org/message/tp5nyqh24tdpybw6 ]
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfranklin@mitre.org]
>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 12:19 PM
>>>>>>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From: sebb [mailto:sebbaz@gmail.com]
>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:06 AM
>>>>>>>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 28 December 2011 19:15, Franklin, Matthew B.
>>>> <mf...@mitre.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> This is the fifth incubator release for Apache Rave, with the artifacts
>>>>> being
>>>>>>>> versioned as 0.6-incubating.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We are requesting at least one additional IPMC member vote, as we
>>>>> have
>>>>>>>> received 2 binding IPMC +1 votes during the release voting on rave-dev
>>> -
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> VOTE: http://s.apache.org/Czr
>>>>>>>>> RESULT: http://s.apache.org/yIQ
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> IPMC member votes from the rave-dev list:
>>>>>>>>> Ate Douma: +1
>>>>>>>>> Ross Gardler: +1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Release notes:
>>>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rave/tags/0.6-
>>>>>>>> incubating/CHANGELOG
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Apparently, I didn't commit back the CHANGELOG for 0.6 . Here is the
>>>> issue
>>>>>>> list from JIRA
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=1231
>>> 1
>>>> 2
>>>>> 90
>>>>>>> &version=12317563
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> which says:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Release Notes - Rave - Version 0.5-INCUBATING
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So what was changed for 0.6?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> SVN source tag (r1208867):
>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rave/tags/0.6-
>>> incubating/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Maven staging repos:
>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherave-
>>>>> 278/
>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherave-
>>>>> 279/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Source release:
>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherave-
>>>>>>>> 278/org/apache/rave/rave-project/0.6-incubating/rave-project-0.6-
>>>>>>>> incubating-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Binary releases
>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/rave/0.6-
>>>>> incubating/apache-
>>>>>>>> rave-0.6-incubating-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/rave/0.6-
>>>>> incubating/apache-
>>>>>>>> rave-0.6-incubating-bin.zip
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> PGP release keys:
>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rave/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Vote open for 72 hours.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-
>>> help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
RE: [1 IPMC VOTE NEEDED] [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
Posted by "Franklin, Matthew B." <mf...@mitre.org>.
>I've had a look, the only issue i see is I don't think the NOTICE file
>in the binary distribution is correct as it has many things which i
>expect are not required. When we last discussed this on general@ we
>said this is not strictly a blocking problem, so
>
>+1
>
>but i think you should do a complete review of whats in the NOTICE
>file with your mentors and remove everything which doesn't need to be
>there.
Thanks for taking a look. I will take your suggestion back to the DEV list and see if our mentors find any changes that need to be made.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [1 IPMC VOTE NEEDED] [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
I've had a look, the only issue i see is I don't think the NOTICE file
in the binary distribution is correct as it has many things which i
expect are not required. When we last discussed this on general@ we
said this is not strictly a blocking problem, so
+1
but i think you should do a complete review of whats in the NOTICE
file with your mentors and remove everything which doesn't need to be
there.
...ant
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
<mf...@mitre.org> wrote:
> We still need to get one more IPMC vote to close this vote. If someone could take a look, it would be greatly appreciated.
>
> -Matt
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfranklin@mitre.org]
>>Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 8:03 AM
>>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfranklin@mitre.org]
>>>Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 8:45 AM
>>>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>>Cc: rave-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: sebb [mailto:sebbaz@gmail.com]
>>>>Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 8:21 AM
>>>>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>>>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
>>>>
>>>>On 9 January 2012 13:09, Franklin, Matthew B. <mf...@mitre.org>
>>>wrote:
>>>>> Does my answer below suffice? It would be nice to close this vote out
>>one
>>>>way or another....
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>The answer describes what happened.
>>>>However, it does not fix the problem, which is that the end-user sees
>>>>a file with conflicting information.
>>>
>>>Thanks. This is what I was looking for, so that we can have the discussion as
>>to
>>>whether or not to cancel the release (we won't do a re-release).
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Not a blocker, but you may find it takes less time overall to fix the
>>>>issue before release rather than dealing with user queries afterwards.
>>>>
>>>>It may also lessen confidence in the release: if there is such an
>>>>obvious error, what other errors are lurking?
>>>
>>>While I agree that it doesn't look great, the CHANGELOG is distributed with
>>>the source release and is probably not viewed as much as the release notes
>>>sent out with the announcement (which will be the JIRA list I linked). I will
>>>take this back to our dev list, but if they don't see it as a blocker, would you
>>be
>>>comfortable voting +1?
>>
>>The community was presented with the issue and via lazy consensus agreed
>>to move forward with the release, even though the CHANGELOG file is
>>incorrect. We still need 1 final IPMC vote to release.
>>
>>[ Community discussion on proceeding:
>>http://markmail.org/message/tp5nyqh24tdpybw6 ]
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>>From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfranklin@mitre.org]
>>>>>>Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 12:19 PM
>>>>>>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>From: sebb [mailto:sebbaz@gmail.com]
>>>>>>>Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:06 AM
>>>>>>>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On 28 December 2011 19:15, Franklin, Matthew B.
>>><mf...@mitre.org>
>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>> This is the fifth incubator release for Apache Rave, with the artifacts
>>>>being
>>>>>>>versioned as 0.6-incubating.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We are requesting at least one additional IPMC member vote, as we
>>>>have
>>>>>>>received 2 binding IPMC +1 votes during the release voting on rave-dev
>>-
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> VOTE: http://s.apache.org/Czr
>>>>>>>> RESULT: http://s.apache.org/yIQ
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> IPMC member votes from the rave-dev list:
>>>>>>>> Ate Douma: +1
>>>>>>>> Ross Gardler: +1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Release notes:
>>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rave/tags/0.6-
>>>>>>>incubating/CHANGELOG
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Apparently, I didn't commit back the CHANGELOG for 0.6 . Here is the
>>>issue
>>>>>>list from JIRA
>>>>>>
>>>>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=1231
>>1
>>>2
>>>>90
>>>>>>&version=12317563
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>which says:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Release Notes - Rave - Version 0.5-INCUBATING
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>So what was changed for 0.6?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> SVN source tag (r1208867):
>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rave/tags/0.6-
>>incubating/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maven staging repos:
>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherave-
>>>>278/
>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherave-
>>>>279/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Source release:
>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherave-
>>>>>>>278/org/apache/rave/rave-project/0.6-incubating/rave-project-0.6-
>>>>>>>incubating-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Binary releases
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/rave/0.6-
>>>>incubating/apache-
>>>>>>>rave-0.6-incubating-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/rave/0.6-
>>>>incubating/apache-
>>>>>>>rave-0.6-incubating-bin.zip
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> PGP release keys:
>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rave/KEYS
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Vote open for 72 hours.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-
>>help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org