You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geode.apache.org by Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.com> on 2020/02/05 21:53:15 UTC
[Vote] Include GEODE-7752 into 1.12
Hi there Geode dev,
I would like to request that GEODE-7752
(7028f601680fee3f57cbdff63951128d7180ca13) gets included into 1.12.
This piece of code is a refactor of work done in GEODE-7715. This
refactor specializes Builders and simplifies Builder behavior for better
user experience.
--Udo
Re: [Vote] Include GEODE-7752 into 1.12
Posted by Alexander Murmann <am...@apache.org>.
Thanks for the additional context, Udo! That makes a lot of sense.
I want to make sure we are very deliberate about including anything but a
critical fix in a release branch after it has been cut.
+1 to including Udo's change once we feel confident about the tests
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 4:27 PM Jinmei Liao <ji...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> Even though the management service is still marketed as "experimental" and
> we don't need to go through deprecations, I would still very much prefer
> this gets pulled into 1.12 so that users don't have to deal with
> experimental public API changes.
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 4:23 PM Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.com> wrote:
>
> > @Alexander, I can most certainly elaborate more.
> >
> > In short, this refactor does not have to be in 1.12, but it does alter
> > public Builders and classes. Which means, that if we don't release it
> > with 1.12, we would have to go through the cycle of deprecation,etc. to
> > get this change in. Given that the initial GEODE-7715 ticket is not in
> > any released version of Geode, it would just simplify the process of not
> > having to go through unnecessary pain to simplify and make this process
> > more intuitive for users.
> >
> > Does this answer your question as to why?
> >
> > --Udo
> >
> >
> > On 2/5/20 3:01 PM, Alexander Murmann wrote:
> > > Udo, you say "refactor", but this sounds more like a feature or user
> > facing
> > > improvement. Do you mind elaborating a little more why this should be
> in
> > > this release?
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 1:54 PM Patrick Johnson
> > <jp...@vmware.com.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> On 2/5/20, 1:53 PM, "Udo Kohlmeyer" <ud...@apache.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi there Geode dev,
> > >>
> > >> I would like to request that GEODE-7752
> > >> (7028f601680fee3f57cbdff63951128d7180ca13) gets included into
> 1.12.
> > >>
> > >> This piece of code is a refactor of work done in GEODE-7715. This
> > >> refactor specializes Builders and simplifies Builder behavior for
> > >> better
> > >> user experience.
> > >>
> > >> --Udo
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Cheers
>
> Jinmei
>
Re: [Vote] Include GEODE-7752 into 1.12
Posted by Jinmei Liao <ji...@pivotal.io>.
Even though the management service is still marketed as "experimental" and
we don't need to go through deprecations, I would still very much prefer
this gets pulled into 1.12 so that users don't have to deal with
experimental public API changes.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 4:23 PM Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.com> wrote:
> @Alexander, I can most certainly elaborate more.
>
> In short, this refactor does not have to be in 1.12, but it does alter
> public Builders and classes. Which means, that if we don't release it
> with 1.12, we would have to go through the cycle of deprecation,etc. to
> get this change in. Given that the initial GEODE-7715 ticket is not in
> any released version of Geode, it would just simplify the process of not
> having to go through unnecessary pain to simplify and make this process
> more intuitive for users.
>
> Does this answer your question as to why?
>
> --Udo
>
>
> On 2/5/20 3:01 PM, Alexander Murmann wrote:
> > Udo, you say "refactor", but this sounds more like a feature or user
> facing
> > improvement. Do you mind elaborating a little more why this should be in
> > this release?
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 1:54 PM Patrick Johnson
> <jp...@vmware.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On 2/5/20, 1:53 PM, "Udo Kohlmeyer" <ud...@apache.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi there Geode dev,
> >>
> >> I would like to request that GEODE-7752
> >> (7028f601680fee3f57cbdff63951128d7180ca13) gets included into 1.12.
> >>
> >> This piece of code is a refactor of work done in GEODE-7715. This
> >> refactor specializes Builders and simplifies Builder behavior for
> >> better
> >> user experience.
> >>
> >> --Udo
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
--
Cheers
Jinmei
Re: [Vote] Include GEODE-7752 into 1.12
Posted by Owen Nichols <on...@pivotal.io>.
+1
Getting it right the first time will definitely save us pains down the road.
> On Feb 5, 2020, at 4:23 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.com> wrote:
>
> @Alexander, I can most certainly elaborate more.
>
> In short, this refactor does not have to be in 1.12, but it does alter public Builders and classes. Which means, that if we don't release it with 1.12, we would have to go through the cycle of deprecation,etc. to get this change in. Given that the initial GEODE-7715 ticket is not in any released version of Geode, it would just simplify the process of not having to go through unnecessary pain to simplify and make this process more intuitive for users.
>
> Does this answer your question as to why?
>
> --Udo
>
>
> On 2/5/20 3:01 PM, Alexander Murmann wrote:
>> Udo, you say "refactor", but this sounds more like a feature or user facing
>> improvement. Do you mind elaborating a little more why this should be in
>> this release?
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 1:54 PM Patrick Johnson <jp...@vmware.com.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On 2/5/20, 1:53 PM, "Udo Kohlmeyer" <ud...@apache.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi there Geode dev,
>>>
>>> I would like to request that GEODE-7752
>>> (7028f601680fee3f57cbdff63951128d7180ca13) gets included into 1.12.
>>>
>>> This piece of code is a refactor of work done in GEODE-7715. This
>>> refactor specializes Builders and simplifies Builder behavior for
>>> better
>>> user experience.
>>>
>>> --Udo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
Re: [Vote] Include GEODE-7752 into 1.12
Posted by Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.com>.
@Alexander, I can most certainly elaborate more.
In short, this refactor does not have to be in 1.12, but it does alter
public Builders and classes. Which means, that if we don't release it
with 1.12, we would have to go through the cycle of deprecation,etc. to
get this change in. Given that the initial GEODE-7715 ticket is not in
any released version of Geode, it would just simplify the process of not
having to go through unnecessary pain to simplify and make this process
more intuitive for users.
Does this answer your question as to why?
--Udo
On 2/5/20 3:01 PM, Alexander Murmann wrote:
> Udo, you say "refactor", but this sounds more like a feature or user facing
> improvement. Do you mind elaborating a little more why this should be in
> this release?
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 1:54 PM Patrick Johnson <jp...@vmware.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On 2/5/20, 1:53 PM, "Udo Kohlmeyer" <ud...@apache.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi there Geode dev,
>>
>> I would like to request that GEODE-7752
>> (7028f601680fee3f57cbdff63951128d7180ca13) gets included into 1.12.
>>
>> This piece of code is a refactor of work done in GEODE-7715. This
>> refactor specializes Builders and simplifies Builder behavior for
>> better
>> user experience.
>>
>> --Udo
>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: [Vote] Include GEODE-7752 into 1.12
Posted by Ernest Burghardt <eb...@pivotal.io>.
errata
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 10:36 AM Ernest Burghardt <eb...@pivotal.io>
wrote:
> There appears to be consensus that this is a critical fix.
>
> The following commit has been brought into release/1.12 as the critical fix for GEODE-7752:
>
> git cherry-pick -x 7028f601680fee3f57cbdff63951128d7180ca13
> git cherry-pick -x 9c102e4f8836ca32ad51a05bbd4d0107e8fc0343
>
> GEODE-7752 has been marked as 'resolved in' 1.12.
>
> Regards
> EB
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 9:17 PM Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi there EB,
>>
>> fix has been merged to develop. (Everything is green now)
>>
>> 9c102e4f8836ca32ad51a05bbd4d0107e8fc0343
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> --Udo
>>
>> 0On 2/5/20 4:34 PM, Ernest Burghardt wrote:
>> > Fair enough Udo, just let us know when you have it ready.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > EB
>> >
>> > On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 4:31 PM Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> My apologies.. I had paid further attention to this, after I made
>> >> changes to the assembly-context.txt file.
>> >>
>> >> I will revert now and then come back when it passes all test
>> requirements.
>> >>
>> >> --Udo
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 2/5/20 4:14 PM, Ernest Burghardt wrote:
>> >>> Udo,
>> >>> the PR has some failing tests that are in the "non-mandatory" category
>> >> for
>> >>> merge, TBH I'd prefer to have solid green changes being added at this
>> >> point
>> >>> forward...
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> EB
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 3:01 PM Alexander Murmann <amurmann@apache.org
>> >
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Udo, you say "refactor", but this sounds more like a feature or user
>> >> facing
>> >>>> improvement. Do you mind elaborating a little more why this should
>> be in
>> >>>> this release?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 1:54 PM Patrick Johnson
>> >> <jpatrick@vmware.com.invalid
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> +1
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On 2/5/20, 1:53 PM, "Udo Kohlmeyer" <ud...@apache.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Hi there Geode dev,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I would like to request that GEODE-7752
>> >>>>> (7028f601680fee3f57cbdff63951128d7180ca13) gets included into
>> >> 1.12.
>> >>>>> This piece of code is a refactor of work done in GEODE-7715.
>> This
>> >>>>> refactor specializes Builders and simplifies Builder behavior
>> for
>> >>>>> better
>> >>>>> user experience.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --Udo
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>>
>
Re: [Vote] Include GEODE-7752 into 1.12
Posted by Ernest Burghardt <eb...@pivotal.io>.
There appears to be consensus that this is a critical fix.
The following commit has been brought into release/1.12 as the
critical fix for GEODE-7752:
git cherry-pick -x 7028f601680fee3f57cbdff63951128d7180ca13
git cherry-pick -x 9c102e4f8836ca32ad51a05bbd4d0107e8fc0343
GEODE-XXXX has been marked as 'resolved in' 1.12.
Regards
EB
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 9:17 PM Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.com> wrote:
> Hi there EB,
>
> fix has been merged to develop. (Everything is green now)
>
> 9c102e4f8836ca32ad51a05bbd4d0107e8fc0343
>
> Thanks
>
> --Udo
>
> 0On 2/5/20 4:34 PM, Ernest Burghardt wrote:
> > Fair enough Udo, just let us know when you have it ready.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > EB
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 4:31 PM Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.com> wrote:
> >
> >> My apologies.. I had paid further attention to this, after I made
> >> changes to the assembly-context.txt file.
> >>
> >> I will revert now and then come back when it passes all test
> requirements.
> >>
> >> --Udo
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2/5/20 4:14 PM, Ernest Burghardt wrote:
> >>> Udo,
> >>> the PR has some failing tests that are in the "non-mandatory" category
> >> for
> >>> merge, TBH I'd prefer to have solid green changes being added at this
> >> point
> >>> forward...
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> EB
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 3:01 PM Alexander Murmann <am...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Udo, you say "refactor", but this sounds more like a feature or user
> >> facing
> >>>> improvement. Do you mind elaborating a little more why this should be
> in
> >>>> this release?
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 1:54 PM Patrick Johnson
> >> <jpatrick@vmware.com.invalid
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 2/5/20, 1:53 PM, "Udo Kohlmeyer" <ud...@apache.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi there Geode dev,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I would like to request that GEODE-7752
> >>>>> (7028f601680fee3f57cbdff63951128d7180ca13) gets included into
> >> 1.12.
> >>>>> This piece of code is a refactor of work done in GEODE-7715.
> This
> >>>>> refactor specializes Builders and simplifies Builder behavior
> for
> >>>>> better
> >>>>> user experience.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --Udo
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
>
Re: [Vote] Include GEODE-7752 into 1.12
Posted by Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.com>.
Hi there EB,
fix has been merged to develop. (Everything is green now)
9c102e4f8836ca32ad51a05bbd4d0107e8fc0343
Thanks
--Udo
0On 2/5/20 4:34 PM, Ernest Burghardt wrote:
> Fair enough Udo, just let us know when you have it ready.
>
> Thanks,
> EB
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 4:31 PM Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.com> wrote:
>
>> My apologies.. I had paid further attention to this, after I made
>> changes to the assembly-context.txt file.
>>
>> I will revert now and then come back when it passes all test requirements.
>>
>> --Udo
>>
>>
>> On 2/5/20 4:14 PM, Ernest Burghardt wrote:
>>> Udo,
>>> the PR has some failing tests that are in the "non-mandatory" category
>> for
>>> merge, TBH I'd prefer to have solid green changes being added at this
>> point
>>> forward...
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> EB
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 3:01 PM Alexander Murmann <am...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Udo, you say "refactor", but this sounds more like a feature or user
>> facing
>>>> improvement. Do you mind elaborating a little more why this should be in
>>>> this release?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 1:54 PM Patrick Johnson
>> <jpatrick@vmware.com.invalid
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/5/20, 1:53 PM, "Udo Kohlmeyer" <ud...@apache.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi there Geode dev,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to request that GEODE-7752
>>>>> (7028f601680fee3f57cbdff63951128d7180ca13) gets included into
>> 1.12.
>>>>> This piece of code is a refactor of work done in GEODE-7715. This
>>>>> refactor specializes Builders and simplifies Builder behavior for
>>>>> better
>>>>> user experience.
>>>>>
>>>>> --Udo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
Re: [Vote] Include GEODE-7752 into 1.12
Posted by Ernest Burghardt <eb...@pivotal.io>.
Fair enough Udo, just let us know when you have it ready.
Thanks,
EB
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 4:31 PM Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.com> wrote:
> My apologies.. I had paid further attention to this, after I made
> changes to the assembly-context.txt file.
>
> I will revert now and then come back when it passes all test requirements.
>
> --Udo
>
>
> On 2/5/20 4:14 PM, Ernest Burghardt wrote:
> > Udo,
> > the PR has some failing tests that are in the "non-mandatory" category
> for
> > merge, TBH I'd prefer to have solid green changes being added at this
> point
> > forward...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > EB
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 3:01 PM Alexander Murmann <am...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Udo, you say "refactor", but this sounds more like a feature or user
> facing
> >> improvement. Do you mind elaborating a little more why this should be in
> >> this release?
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 1:54 PM Patrick Johnson
> <jpatrick@vmware.com.invalid
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> On 2/5/20, 1:53 PM, "Udo Kohlmeyer" <ud...@apache.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi there Geode dev,
> >>>
> >>> I would like to request that GEODE-7752
> >>> (7028f601680fee3f57cbdff63951128d7180ca13) gets included into
> 1.12.
> >>>
> >>> This piece of code is a refactor of work done in GEODE-7715. This
> >>> refactor specializes Builders and simplifies Builder behavior for
> >>> better
> >>> user experience.
> >>>
> >>> --Udo
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>
Re: [Vote] Include GEODE-7752 into 1.12
Posted by Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.com>.
My apologies.. I had paid further attention to this, after I made
changes to the assembly-context.txt file.
I will revert now and then come back when it passes all test requirements.
--Udo
On 2/5/20 4:14 PM, Ernest Burghardt wrote:
> Udo,
> the PR has some failing tests that are in the "non-mandatory" category for
> merge, TBH I'd prefer to have solid green changes being added at this point
> forward...
>
> Thanks,
> EB
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 3:01 PM Alexander Murmann <am...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Udo, you say "refactor", but this sounds more like a feature or user facing
>> improvement. Do you mind elaborating a little more why this should be in
>> this release?
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 1:54 PM Patrick Johnson <jpatrick@vmware.com.invalid
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On 2/5/20, 1:53 PM, "Udo Kohlmeyer" <ud...@apache.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi there Geode dev,
>>>
>>> I would like to request that GEODE-7752
>>> (7028f601680fee3f57cbdff63951128d7180ca13) gets included into 1.12.
>>>
>>> This piece of code is a refactor of work done in GEODE-7715. This
>>> refactor specializes Builders and simplifies Builder behavior for
>>> better
>>> user experience.
>>>
>>> --Udo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
Re: [Vote] Include GEODE-7752 into 1.12
Posted by Mark Hanson <mh...@pivotal.io>.
Hi Ernie,
Thanks for the heads up. This is breaking DistributedTestOpenJDK and Udo confirmed the are of concern and is going to revert this.
Thanks,
Mark
> On Feb 5, 2020, at 4:14 PM, Ernest Burghardt <eb...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> Udo,
> the PR has some failing tests that are in the "non-mandatory" category for
> merge, TBH I'd prefer to have solid green changes being added at this point
> forward...
>
> Thanks,
> EB
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 3:01 PM Alexander Murmann <am...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Udo, you say "refactor", but this sounds more like a feature or user facing
>> improvement. Do you mind elaborating a little more why this should be in
>> this release?
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 1:54 PM Patrick Johnson <jpatrick@vmware.com.invalid
>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On 2/5/20, 1:53 PM, "Udo Kohlmeyer" <ud...@apache.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi there Geode dev,
>>>
>>> I would like to request that GEODE-7752
>>> (7028f601680fee3f57cbdff63951128d7180ca13) gets included into 1.12.
>>>
>>> This piece of code is a refactor of work done in GEODE-7715. This
>>> refactor specializes Builders and simplifies Builder behavior for
>>> better
>>> user experience.
>>>
>>> --Udo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [Vote] Include GEODE-7752 into 1.12
Posted by Ernest Burghardt <eb...@pivotal.io>.
Udo,
the PR has some failing tests that are in the "non-mandatory" category for
merge, TBH I'd prefer to have solid green changes being added at this point
forward...
Thanks,
EB
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 3:01 PM Alexander Murmann <am...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Udo, you say "refactor", but this sounds more like a feature or user facing
> improvement. Do you mind elaborating a little more why this should be in
> this release?
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 1:54 PM Patrick Johnson <jpatrick@vmware.com.invalid
> >
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On 2/5/20, 1:53 PM, "Udo Kohlmeyer" <ud...@apache.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi there Geode dev,
> >
> > I would like to request that GEODE-7752
> > (7028f601680fee3f57cbdff63951128d7180ca13) gets included into 1.12.
> >
> > This piece of code is a refactor of work done in GEODE-7715. This
> > refactor specializes Builders and simplifies Builder behavior for
> > better
> > user experience.
> >
> > --Udo
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [Vote] Include GEODE-7752 into 1.12
Posted by Alexander Murmann <am...@apache.org>.
Udo, you say "refactor", but this sounds more like a feature or user facing
improvement. Do you mind elaborating a little more why this should be in
this release?
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 1:54 PM Patrick Johnson <jp...@vmware.com.invalid>
wrote:
> +1
>
> On 2/5/20, 1:53 PM, "Udo Kohlmeyer" <ud...@apache.com> wrote:
>
> Hi there Geode dev,
>
> I would like to request that GEODE-7752
> (7028f601680fee3f57cbdff63951128d7180ca13) gets included into 1.12.
>
> This piece of code is a refactor of work done in GEODE-7715. This
> refactor specializes Builders and simplifies Builder behavior for
> better
> user experience.
>
> --Udo
>
>
>
>
Re: [Vote] Include GEODE-7752 into 1.12
Posted by Jinmei Liao <ji...@pivotal.io>.
+1
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 2:36 PM John Blum <jb...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 1:54 PM Patrick Johnson <jpatrick@vmware.com.invalid
> >
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On 2/5/20, 1:53 PM, "Udo Kohlmeyer" <ud...@apache.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi there Geode dev,
> >
> > I would like to request that GEODE-7752
> > (7028f601680fee3f57cbdff63951128d7180ca13) gets included into 1.12.
> >
> > This piece of code is a refactor of work done in GEODE-7715. This
> > refactor specializes Builders and simplifies Builder behavior for
> > better
> > user experience.
> >
> > --Udo
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> -John
> Spring Data Team
>
--
Cheers
Jinmei
Re: [Vote] Include GEODE-7752 into 1.12
Posted by John Blum <jb...@pivotal.io>.
+1
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 1:54 PM Patrick Johnson <jp...@vmware.com.invalid>
wrote:
> +1
>
> On 2/5/20, 1:53 PM, "Udo Kohlmeyer" <ud...@apache.com> wrote:
>
> Hi there Geode dev,
>
> I would like to request that GEODE-7752
> (7028f601680fee3f57cbdff63951128d7180ca13) gets included into 1.12.
>
> This piece of code is a refactor of work done in GEODE-7715. This
> refactor specializes Builders and simplifies Builder behavior for
> better
> user experience.
>
> --Udo
>
>
>
>
--
-John
Spring Data Team
Re: [Vote] Include GEODE-7752 into 1.12
Posted by Patrick Johnson <jp...@vmware.com.INVALID>.
+1
On 2/5/20, 1:53 PM, "Udo Kohlmeyer" <ud...@apache.com> wrote:
Hi there Geode dev,
I would like to request that GEODE-7752
(7028f601680fee3f57cbdff63951128d7180ca13) gets included into 1.12.
This piece of code is a refactor of work done in GEODE-7715. This
refactor specializes Builders and simplifies Builder behavior for better
user experience.
--Udo