You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@solr.apache.org by "Chris M. Hostetter (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2025/02/15 01:23:00 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-17351) Cosmetic changes to v2 filestore "get file" API

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17927313#comment-17927313 ] 

Chris M. Hostetter edited comment on SOLR-17351 at 2/15/25 1:22 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------------

{quote}...the PR definitely touches ObjectReleaseTraacker stuff, so the failure makes sense even though I can't reproduce, ...
{quote}
I find that very troubling.

I'm attaching a TGZ with the full failure logs from re-running the 5 reproduce lines i mentioned above as of 2ab12431c04

AFAICT it looks like there are 2 distinct code paths that are problematic....
{noformat}
   >     org.eclipse.jetty.client.util.InputStreamResponseListener$Input:org.apache.solr.common.util.ObjectReleaseTracker$ObjectTrackerException: org.eclipse.jetty.client.util.InputStreamResponseListener$Input
   >            at org.apache.solr.common.util.ObjectReleaseTracker.track(ObjectReleaseTracker.java:54)
   >            at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.Http2SolrClient$InputStreamReleaseTrackingResponseListener$ObjectReleaseTrackedInputStream.<init>(Http2SolrClient.java:1213)
   >            at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.Http2SolrClient$InputStreamReleaseTrackingResponseListener.getInputStream(Http2SolrClient.java:1207)
   >            at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.Http2SolrClient.request(Http2SolrClient.java:519)
   >            at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:260)
   >            at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:276)
   >            at org.apache.solr.filestore.DistribFileStore.distribute(DistribFileStore.java:389)
{noformat}
{noformat}
   >     org.eclipse.jetty.client.util.InputStreamResponseListener$Input:org.apache.solr.common.util.ObjectReleaseTracker$ObjectTrackerException: org.eclipse.jetty.client.util.InputStreamRe
sponseListener$Input
   >            at org.apache.solr.common.util.ObjectReleaseTracker.track(ObjectReleaseTracker.java:54)
   >            at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.Http2SolrClient$InputStreamReleaseTrackingResponseListener$ObjectReleaseTrackedInputStream.<init>(Http2SolrClient.java:1213)
   >            at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.Http2SolrClient$InputStreamReleaseTrackingResponseListener.getInputStream(Http2SolrClient.java:1207)
   >            at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.Http2SolrClient.request(Http2SolrClient.java:519)
   >            at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:260)
   >            at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:276)
   >            at org.apache.solr.filestore.DistribFileStore$FileInfo.fetchFileFromNodeAndPersist(DistribFileStore.java:192)
{noformat}
At a glance, i don't see an obvious explanation for the problem with {{DistribFileStore.distribute(DistribFileStore.java:389)}} – but i also didn't drill down into the impl of the request/response being used.

On the other hand: {{DistribFileStore$FileInfo.fetchFileFromNodeAndPersist(DistribFileStore.java:192)}} seems like a very cut & dry problem...
{code:java}
        metadata =
            Utils.newBytesConsumer((int) MAX_PKG_SIZE)
                .accept(response.getResponseStreamIfSuccessful());
{code}
 * {{response.getResponseStreamIfSuccessful()}} returns the tracked stream (IIUC)
 * the consumer returned by {{Utils.newBytesConsumer}} does nothing to close that stream.

A suspicious code smell is that a few lines before this an {{InputStream is = null;}} is declared, and a few line after this is {{org.apache.solr.common.util.IOUtils.closeQuietly(is);}} ... but other then that " {{is}} " is dead code, never assigned. (but prior to 2ab12431c04 it was)

Also, FWIW, the one other line in your patch where you added a call to {{getResponseStreamIfSuccessful()}} you did so in a "try-with-resources" .. but here you did not.


was (Author: hossman):
{quote}...the PR definitely touches ObjectReleaseTraacker stuff, so the failure makes sense even though I can't reproduce, ...
{quote}
I find that very troubling.

I'm attaching a TGZ with the full failure logs from re-running the 5 reproduce lines i mentioned above as of 2ab12431c04

AFAICT it looks like there are 2 distinct code paths that are problematic....
{noformat}
   >     org.eclipse.jetty.client.util.InputStreamResponseListener$Input:org.apache.solr.common.util.ObjectReleaseTracker$ObjectTrackerException: org.eclipse.jetty.client.util.InputStreamResponseListener$Input
   >            at org.apache.solr.common.util.ObjectReleaseTracker.track(ObjectReleaseTracker.java:54)
   >            at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.Http2SolrClient$InputStreamReleaseTrackingResponseListener$ObjectReleaseTrackedInputStream.<init>(Http2SolrClient.java:1213)
   >            at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.Http2SolrClient$InputStreamReleaseTrackingResponseListener.getInputStream(Http2SolrClient.java:1207)
   >            at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.Http2SolrClient.request(Http2SolrClient.java:519)
   >            at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:260)
   >            at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:276)
   >            at org.apache.solr.filestore.DistribFileStore.distribute(DistribFileStore.java:389)
{noformat}
{noformat}
   >     org.eclipse.jetty.client.util.InputStreamResponseListener$Input:org.apache.solr.common.util.ObjectReleaseTracker$ObjectTrackerException: org.eclipse.jetty.client.util.InputStreamRe
sponseListener$Input
   >            at org.apache.solr.common.util.ObjectReleaseTracker.track(ObjectReleaseTracker.java:54)
   >            at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.Http2SolrClient$InputStreamReleaseTrackingResponseListener$ObjectReleaseTrackedInputStream.<init>(Http2SolrClient.java:1213)
   >            at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.Http2SolrClient$InputStreamReleaseTrackingResponseListener.getInputStream(Http2SolrClient.java:1207)
   >            at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.Http2SolrClient.request(Http2SolrClient.java:519)
   >            at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:260)
   >            at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:276)
   >            at org.apache.solr.filestore.DistribFileStore$FileInfo.fetchFileFromNodeAndPersist(DistribFileStore.java:192)
{noformat}
At a glance, i don't see an obvious explanation for the problem with {{DistribFileStore.distribute(DistribFileStore.java:389)}} – but i also didn't drill down into the impl of the request/response being used.

On the other hand: {{DistribFileStore$FileInfo.fetchFileFromNodeAndPersist(DistribFileStore.java:192)}} seems like a very cut & dry problem...
{code:java}
        metadata =
            Utils.newBytesConsumer((int) MAX_PKG_SIZE)
                .accept(response.getResponseStreamIfSuccessful());
{code}
 * {{response.getResponseStreamIfSuccessful()}} returns the tracked stream (IIUC)
 * the consumer returned by {{Utils.newBytesConsumer}} does nothing to close that stream.

A suspicious code smell is that a few lines before this an {{InputStream is = null;}} is declared, and a few line after this is {{org.apache.solr.common.util.IOUtils.closeQuietly(is);}} ... but other then that {{is}} is dead code, never assigned. (but prior to 2ab12431c04 it was)

Also, FWIW, the one other line in your patch where you added a call to {{getResponseStreamIfSuccessful()}} you did so in a "try-with-resources" .. but here you did not.

> Cosmetic changes to v2 filestore "get file" API
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-17351
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17351
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Package Manager, v2 API
>    Affects Versions: 9.6.1
>            Reporter: Jason Gerlowski
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>         Attachments: SOLR-17351.test-failures.tgz
>
>          Time Spent: 2h 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Solr's filestore APIs fit well with the REST-ful design we're targeting with our v2 APIs, with one large exception: the "get file" API current available at {{GET /api/node/files/somePath.txt}}.  This API stands out for a few reasons:
> 1. It uses a different path-prefix than all other filestore APIs.  (i.e. {{/api/node/files}} instead of {{/api/cluster/files}})
> 2. It exposes 4 or 5 conceptually distinct operations. Obviously in the "default" case it allows callers to retrieve filestore contents, but based on query params it can instead:
>   - return filestore entry metadata (when {{meta=true}} is specified)
>   - instruct the receiving Solr node to pull a file from another node's filestore and cache it locally (when {{getFrom=someOtherNode}} is specified)
>   - instruct the receiving Solr node to push its cached copy of a file out to all other Solr nodes (when {{sync=true}} is specified)
> 3. Even in the default case of returning "raw" filestore contents, the API can provide two different styles of response:
>   - if {{wt=json}} is specified Solr will take the filestore entry bytes, attempt to stringify them, and then return a JSON object that uses this string as the value for a "response" key.  It's unclear how this would work for binary content 
>   - for all other values of "wt", the API will return the raw file content.
> We should reconsider this endpoint and see if it can't be massaged into being more in line with our other v2 APIs.  Some cosmetic tweaks will go a long way, but the biggest benefit is likely to come from breaking the endpoint up into multiple distinct APIs.  In its current form, the API returns such a variety of responses that it's hard to write client code for.  (I suspect this is the main reason these "filestore" APIs were never made available in SolrJ.)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@solr.apache.org