You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk> on 2009/06/04 13:28:41 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)
Hi,
Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations
of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
applications.
Vote Thread.
http://markmail.org/thread/mrk4uwe7mg5e3uho
Proposed release:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-002//org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.0-incubating/
SVN Tag is
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shindig/tags/shindig-project-1.0-incubating/
revision 780648
Vote open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
Thanks,
Ian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)
Posted by Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk>.
On 4 Jun 2009, at 21:08, sebb wrote:
> On 04/06/2009, Paul Lindner <li...@inuus.com> wrote:
>> I don't see these as release blockers... I'd like to see us get
>> the 1.0
>> release out the door and then immediately work to apply the release
>> process
>> to 1.1 snapshots. This was a frequent request from multiple people
>> at
>> Google I/O.
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
>>
-- snip --
>>
>>> These are probably not supposed to be in the source archive, they
>>> must have
>>> slipped trough during the build process, which does have filters
>>> in place to
>>> exclude them, but thats obviously not working. I will file a bug.
>>>
>
> The maven-clean-plugin config lists the file names without any path
> info, so will only delete files in the working directory.
>
>>> They are generated by JPA when it build the tests giving the default
>>> database schema for the samples project.
>
> It would be better if the test files were generated in a directory
> which is exclusively used for temporary test items, e.g. a work
> directory under target/. There would then be no need to remove the
> files later.
>
Good point, I will fix.
-- snip --
>>>
>>>
>>> IYO, are any of these release blockers ?
>>>
>
> The source archive is supposed to be derivable from SVN, which is why
> I asked where the extra files came from. I suppose this is true here.
>
> It's not ideal to leave test output in the source archive; but it is
> probably not a release blocker.
>
> However, if I were the RM, I would create another release candidate.
>
> Your call.
In light of Paul's comment and the amount of time we (I) have taken
over getting this release out, I would like to leave the release as
is, and fix all the problems identified so far in this release, in the
1.1 release asap.
Thanks
Ian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)
Posted by Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk>.
On 4 Jun 2009, at 21:08, sebb wrote:
> On 04/06/2009, Paul Lindner <li...@inuus.com> wrote:
>> I don't see these as release blockers... I'd like to see us get
>> the 1.0
>> release out the door and then immediately work to apply the release
>> process
>> to 1.1 snapshots. This was a frequent request from multiple people
>> at
>> Google I/O.
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
>>
-- snip --
>>
>>> These are probably not supposed to be in the source archive, they
>>> must have
>>> slipped trough during the build process, which does have filters
>>> in place to
>>> exclude them, but thats obviously not working. I will file a bug.
>>>
>
> The maven-clean-plugin config lists the file names without any path
> info, so will only delete files in the working directory.
>
>>> They are generated by JPA when it build the tests giving the default
>>> database schema for the samples project.
>
> It would be better if the test files were generated in a directory
> which is exclusively used for temporary test items, e.g. a work
> directory under target/. There would then be no need to remove the
> files later.
>
Good point, I will fix.
-- snip --
>>>
>>>
>>> IYO, are any of these release blockers ?
>>>
>
> The source archive is supposed to be derivable from SVN, which is why
> I asked where the extra files came from. I suppose this is true here.
>
> It's not ideal to leave test output in the source archive; but it is
> probably not a release blocker.
>
> However, if I were the RM, I would create another release candidate.
>
> Your call.
In light of Paul's comment and the amount of time we (I) have taken
over getting this release out, I would like to leave the release as
is, and fix all the problems identified so far in this release, in the
1.1 release asap.
Thanks
Ian
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 04/06/2009, Paul Lindner <li...@inuus.com> wrote:
> I don't see these as release blockers... I'd like to see us get the 1.0
> release out the door and then immediately work to apply the release process
> to 1.1 snapshots. This was a frequent request from multiple people at
> Google I/O.
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > On 4 Jun 2009, at 16:21, sebb wrote:
> >
> > On 04/06/2009, Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
> >>> Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
> >>> Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations
> >>> of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
> >>> applications.
> >>>
> >>> Vote Thread.
> >>> http://markmail.org/thread/mrk4uwe7mg5e3uho
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Proposed release:
> >>>
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-002//org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.0-incubating/
> >>>
> >>> SVN Tag is
> >>>
> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shindig/tags/shindig-project-1.0-incubating/
> >>> revision 780648
> >>>
> >>>
> >> There are 3 files in the source archive that are missing from SVN:
> >>
> >> java/samples/create.sql
> >> java/samples/derby.log
> >> java/samples/drop.sql
> >>
> >> It looks like these are not supposed to be in the source archive.
> >>
> >
>
> > These are probably not supposed to be in the source archive, they must have
> > slipped trough during the build process, which does have filters in place to
> > exclude them, but thats obviously not working. I will file a bug.
> >
The maven-clean-plugin config lists the file names without any path
info, so will only delete files in the working directory.
> > They are generated by JPA when it build the tests giving the default
> > database schema for the samples project.
It would be better if the test files were generated in a directory
which is exclusively used for temporary test items, e.g. a work
directory under target/. There would then be no need to remove the
files later.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Where do the SQL files originate?
> >> I could not find how these were created from the files in SVN.
> >>
> >> =
> >>
> >> The file README.svn has a misleading name; it ought to be called
> >> README_svn.txt or similar otherwise it won't be easily usable on some
> >> OSes, e.g. Windows.
> >>
> >
>
> > Thank you will fix.
>
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Some missing SVN properties (not a release blocker):
> >>
> >> svn ps svn:eol-style native LICENSE
> >> svn ps svn:eol-style native NOTICE
> >> svn ps svn:eol-style native features/LICENSE
> >> svn ps svn:eol-style native features/NOTICE
> >>
> >
> >
>
> > Thank you, will fix in svn.
> >
> >
> > IYO, are any of these release blockers ?
> >
The source archive is supposed to be derivable from SVN, which is why
I asked where the extra files came from. I suppose this is true here.
It's not ideal to leave test output in the source archive; but it is
probably not a release blocker.
However, if I were the RM, I would create another release candidate.
Your call.
> > Ian
>
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Vote open for 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1
> >>> [ ] +0
> >>> [ ] -1
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Ian
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >>> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >>> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)
Posted by Paul Lindner <li...@inuus.com>.
I don't see these as release blockers... I'd like to see us get the 1.0
release out the door and then immediately work to apply the release process
to 1.1 snapshots. This was a frequent request from multiple people at
Google I/O.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On 4 Jun 2009, at 16:21, sebb wrote:
>
> On 04/06/2009, Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
>>> Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
>>> Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations
>>> of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
>>> applications.
>>>
>>> Vote Thread.
>>> http://markmail.org/thread/mrk4uwe7mg5e3uho
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Proposed release:
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-002//org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.0-incubating/
>>>
>>> SVN Tag is
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shindig/tags/shindig-project-1.0-incubating/
>>> revision 780648
>>>
>>>
>> There are 3 files in the source archive that are missing from SVN:
>>
>> java/samples/create.sql
>> java/samples/derby.log
>> java/samples/drop.sql
>>
>> It looks like these are not supposed to be in the source archive.
>>
>
> These are probably not supposed to be in the source archive, they must have
> slipped trough during the build process, which does have filters in place to
> exclude them, but thats obviously not working. I will file a bug.
>
> They are generated by JPA when it build the tests giving the default
> database schema for the samples project.
>
>
>>
>> Where do the SQL files originate?
>> I could not find how these were created from the files in SVN.
>>
>> =
>>
>> The file README.svn has a misleading name; it ought to be called
>> README_svn.txt or similar otherwise it won't be easily usable on some
>> OSes, e.g. Windows.
>>
>
> Thank you will fix.
>
>
>>
>> Some missing SVN properties (not a release blocker):
>>
>> svn ps svn:eol-style native LICENSE
>> svn ps svn:eol-style native NOTICE
>> svn ps svn:eol-style native features/LICENSE
>> svn ps svn:eol-style native features/NOTICE
>>
>
>
> Thank you, will fix in svn.
>
>
> IYO, are any of these release blockers ?
>
> Ian
>
>
>>
>>
>> Vote open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Ian
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)
Posted by Paul Lindner <li...@inuus.com>.
I don't see these as release blockers... I'd like to see us get the 1.0
release out the door and then immediately work to apply the release process
to 1.1 snapshots. This was a frequent request from multiple people at
Google I/O.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On 4 Jun 2009, at 16:21, sebb wrote:
>
> On 04/06/2009, Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
>>> Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
>>> Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations
>>> of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
>>> applications.
>>>
>>> Vote Thread.
>>> http://markmail.org/thread/mrk4uwe7mg5e3uho
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Proposed release:
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-002//org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.0-incubating/
>>>
>>> SVN Tag is
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shindig/tags/shindig-project-1.0-incubating/
>>> revision 780648
>>>
>>>
>> There are 3 files in the source archive that are missing from SVN:
>>
>> java/samples/create.sql
>> java/samples/derby.log
>> java/samples/drop.sql
>>
>> It looks like these are not supposed to be in the source archive.
>>
>
> These are probably not supposed to be in the source archive, they must have
> slipped trough during the build process, which does have filters in place to
> exclude them, but thats obviously not working. I will file a bug.
>
> They are generated by JPA when it build the tests giving the default
> database schema for the samples project.
>
>
>>
>> Where do the SQL files originate?
>> I could not find how these were created from the files in SVN.
>>
>> =
>>
>> The file README.svn has a misleading name; it ought to be called
>> README_svn.txt or similar otherwise it won't be easily usable on some
>> OSes, e.g. Windows.
>>
>
> Thank you will fix.
>
>
>>
>> Some missing SVN properties (not a release blocker):
>>
>> svn ps svn:eol-style native LICENSE
>> svn ps svn:eol-style native NOTICE
>> svn ps svn:eol-style native features/LICENSE
>> svn ps svn:eol-style native features/NOTICE
>>
>
>
> Thank you, will fix in svn.
>
>
> IYO, are any of these release blockers ?
>
> Ian
>
>
>>
>>
>> Vote open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Ian
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)
Posted by Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk>.
On 4 Jun 2009, at 16:21, sebb wrote:
> On 04/06/2009, Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
>> Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
>> Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and
>> implementations
>> of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
>> applications.
>>
>> Vote Thread.
>> http://markmail.org/thread/mrk4uwe7mg5e3uho
>>
>>
>>
>> Proposed release:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-002//org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.0-incubating/
>>
>> SVN Tag is
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shindig/tags/shindig-project-1.0-incubating/
>> revision 780648
>>
>
> There are 3 files in the source archive that are missing from SVN:
>
> java/samples/create.sql
> java/samples/derby.log
> java/samples/drop.sql
>
> It looks like these are not supposed to be in the source archive.
These are probably not supposed to be in the source archive, they must
have slipped trough during the build process, which does have filters
in place to exclude them, but thats obviously not working. I will file
a bug.
They are generated by JPA when it build the tests giving the default
database schema for the samples project.
>
>
> Where do the SQL files originate?
> I could not find how these were created from the files in SVN.
>
> =
>
> The file README.svn has a misleading name; it ought to be called
> README_svn.txt or similar otherwise it won't be easily usable on some
> OSes, e.g. Windows.
Thank you will fix.
>
>
> Some missing SVN properties (not a release blocker):
>
> svn ps svn:eol-style native LICENSE
> svn ps svn:eol-style native NOTICE
> svn ps svn:eol-style native features/LICENSE
> svn ps svn:eol-style native features/NOTICE
Thank you, will fix in svn.
IYO, are any of these release blockers ?
Ian
>
>
>
>> Vote open for 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ian
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)
Posted by Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk>.
On 4 Jun 2009, at 16:21, sebb wrote:
> On 04/06/2009, Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
>> Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
>> Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and
>> implementations
>> of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
>> applications.
>>
>> Vote Thread.
>> http://markmail.org/thread/mrk4uwe7mg5e3uho
>>
>>
>>
>> Proposed release:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-002//org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.0-incubating/
>>
>> SVN Tag is
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shindig/tags/shindig-project-1.0-incubating/
>> revision 780648
>>
>
> There are 3 files in the source archive that are missing from SVN:
>
> java/samples/create.sql
> java/samples/derby.log
> java/samples/drop.sql
>
> It looks like these are not supposed to be in the source archive.
These are probably not supposed to be in the source archive, they must
have slipped trough during the build process, which does have filters
in place to exclude them, but thats obviously not working. I will file
a bug.
They are generated by JPA when it build the tests giving the default
database schema for the samples project.
>
>
> Where do the SQL files originate?
> I could not find how these were created from the files in SVN.
>
> =
>
> The file README.svn has a misleading name; it ought to be called
> README_svn.txt or similar otherwise it won't be easily usable on some
> OSes, e.g. Windows.
Thank you will fix.
>
>
> Some missing SVN properties (not a release blocker):
>
> svn ps svn:eol-style native LICENSE
> svn ps svn:eol-style native NOTICE
> svn ps svn:eol-style native features/LICENSE
> svn ps svn:eol-style native features/NOTICE
Thank you, will fix in svn.
IYO, are any of these release blockers ?
Ian
>
>
>
>> Vote open for 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ian
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 04/06/2009, Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
> Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
> Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations
> of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
> applications.
>
> Vote Thread.
> http://markmail.org/thread/mrk4uwe7mg5e3uho
>
>
>
> Proposed release:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-002//org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.0-incubating/
>
> SVN Tag is
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shindig/tags/shindig-project-1.0-incubating/
> revision 780648
>
There are 3 files in the source archive that are missing from SVN:
java/samples/create.sql
java/samples/derby.log
java/samples/drop.sql
It looks like these are not supposed to be in the source archive.
Where do the SQL files originate?
I could not find how these were created from the files in SVN.
=
The file README.svn has a misleading name; it ought to be called
README_svn.txt or similar otherwise it won't be easily usable on some
OSes, e.g. Windows.
Some missing SVN properties (not a release blocker):
svn ps svn:eol-style native LICENSE
svn ps svn:eol-style native NOTICE
svn ps svn:eol-style native features/LICENSE
svn ps svn:eol-style native features/NOTICE
> Vote open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ian
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)
Posted by Leo Simons <ma...@leosimons.com>.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Ian Boston<ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
> Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
> Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
...
> Proposed release:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-002//org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.0-incubating/
+1 (binding, IPMC) from me.
sorry for the delay, have been a tad busy lately :-)
cheers,
- Leo
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 04/06/2009, Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
> Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
> Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations
> of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
> applications.
>
> Vote Thread.
> http://markmail.org/thread/mrk4uwe7mg5e3uho
>
>
>
> Proposed release:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-002//org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.0-incubating/
>
> SVN Tag is
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shindig/tags/shindig-project-1.0-incubating/
> revision 780648
>
There are 3 files in the source archive that are missing from SVN:
java/samples/create.sql
java/samples/derby.log
java/samples/drop.sql
It looks like these are not supposed to be in the source archive.
Where do the SQL files originate?
I could not find how these were created from the files in SVN.
=
The file README.svn has a misleading name; it ought to be called
README_svn.txt or similar otherwise it won't be easily usable on some
OSes, e.g. Windows.
Some missing SVN properties (not a release blocker):
svn ps svn:eol-style native LICENSE
svn ps svn:eol-style native NOTICE
svn ps svn:eol-style native features/LICENSE
svn ps svn:eol-style native features/NOTICE
> Vote open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ian
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)
Posted by Leo Simons <ma...@leosimons.com>.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Ian Boston<ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
> Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
> Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
...
> Proposed release:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-002//org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.0-incubating/
+1 (binding, IPMC) from me.
sorry for the delay, have been a tad busy lately :-)
cheers,
- Leo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
RE: is pub-sub sample broken?
Posted by pi...@wipro.com.
Mark,
Sorry in delay in response. I did not do anything more to make it work
in firefox.
Thanks,
Pinky Muralidhar.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark D Weitzel [mailto:weitzelm@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 2:55 AM
To: shindig-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: shindig-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: is pub-sub sample broken?
Pinky,
I've tried both Firefox and Safari. Neither work. Did you have to do
anything in particular to get this to work in firefox?
Thanks,
-Mark W.
From:
<pi...@wipro.com>
To:
<sh...@incubator.apache.org>
Date:
06/05/2009 12:08 AM
Subject:
RE: is pub-sub sample broken?
Hi Mark,
I faced the same problem with IE. In Mozilla Firefox it worked fine for
me.
Thanks,
Pinky Muralidhar.
________________________________
From: Mark D Weitzel [mailto:weitzelm@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 1:19 AM
To: shindig-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: is pub-sub sample broken?
I just sync'd with trunk. I was trying to show someone the pub-sub
example (sample-pubsub.html) but for some reason it looks like the event
isn't reaching the other gadgets (screen cap in pic). I'm hoping that my
workspace just got hosed, but before digging into this a bit more, I was
wondering if anyone else has seen this (if so, I'll open a bug).
Thanks,
-Mark W.
Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments
to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s)
and
may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute
or
copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all
copies of this message and any attachments.
WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient
should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses.
The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus
transmitted by this email.
www.wipro.com
Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
www.wipro.com
RE: is pub-sub sample broken?
Posted by Mark D Weitzel <we...@us.ibm.com>.
Pinky,
I've tried both Firefox and Safari. Neither work. Did you have to do
anything in particular to get this to work in firefox?
Thanks,
-Mark W.
From:
<pi...@wipro.com>
To:
<sh...@incubator.apache.org>
Date:
06/05/2009 12:08 AM
Subject:
RE: is pub-sub sample broken?
Hi Mark,
I faced the same problem with IE. In Mozilla Firefox it worked fine for
me.
Thanks,
Pinky Muralidhar.
________________________________
From: Mark D Weitzel [mailto:weitzelm@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 1:19 AM
To: shindig-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: is pub-sub sample broken?
I just sync'd with trunk. I was trying to show someone the pub-sub
example (sample-pubsub.html) but for some reason it looks like the event
isn't reaching the other gadgets (screen cap in pic). I'm hoping that my
workspace just got hosed, but before digging into this a bit more, I was
wondering if anyone else has seen this (if so, I'll open a bug).
Thanks,
-Mark W.
Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments
to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and
may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or
copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all
copies of this message and any attachments.
WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient
should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses.
The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus
transmitted by this email.
www.wipro.com
RE: is pub-sub sample broken?
Posted by pi...@wipro.com.
Hi Mark,
I faced the same problem with IE. In Mozilla Firefox it worked fine for
me.
Thanks,
Pinky Muralidhar.
________________________________
From: Mark D Weitzel [mailto:weitzelm@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 1:19 AM
To: shindig-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: is pub-sub sample broken?
I just sync'd with trunk. I was trying to show someone the pub-sub
example (sample-pubsub.html) but for some reason it looks like the event
isn't reaching the other gadgets (screen cap in pic). I'm hoping that my
workspace just got hosed, but before digging into this a bit more, I was
wondering if anyone else has seen this (if so, I'll open a bug).
Thanks,
-Mark W.
Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
www.wipro.com
is pub-sub sample broken?
Posted by Mark D Weitzel <we...@us.ibm.com>.
I just sync'd with trunk. I was trying to show someone the pub-sub example
(sample-pubsub.html) but for some reason it looks like the event isn't
reaching the other gadgets (screen cap in pic). I'm hoping that my
workspace just got hosed, but before digging into this a bit more, I was
wondering if anyone else has seen this (if so, I'll open a bug).
Thanks,
-Mark W.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)
Posted by Ben Smith <be...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 4 Jun 2009, at 14:20, chico charlesworth wrote:
> +1
>
> 2009/6/4 Paul Lindner <li...@inuus.com>
>
>> +1 as well..
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
>>> Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
>>> Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and
>>> implementations
>>> of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
>>> applications.
>>>
>>> Vote Thread.
>>> http://markmail.org/thread/mrk4uwe7mg5e3uho
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Proposed release:
>>>
>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-002//org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.0-incubating/
>>>
>>> SVN Tag is
>>>
>>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shindig/tags/shindig-project-1.0-incubating/
>>> revision 780648
>>>
>>>
>>> Vote open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Ian
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)
Posted by chico charlesworth <ch...@googlemail.com>.
+1
2009/6/4 Paul Lindner <li...@inuus.com>
> +1 as well..
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
> > Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
> > Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations
> > of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
> > applications.
> >
> > Vote Thread.
> > http://markmail.org/thread/mrk4uwe7mg5e3uho
> >
> >
> >
> > Proposed release:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-002//org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.0-incubating/
> >
> > SVN Tag is
> >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shindig/tags/shindig-project-1.0-incubating/
> > revision 780648
> >
> >
> > Vote open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ian
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)
Posted by Paul Lindner <li...@inuus.com>.
+1 as well..
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
> Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
> Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations
> of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
> applications.
>
> Vote Thread.
> http://markmail.org/thread/mrk4uwe7mg5e3uho
>
>
>
> Proposed release:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-002//org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.0-incubating/
>
> SVN Tag is
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shindig/tags/shindig-project-1.0-incubating/
> revision 780648
>
>
> Vote open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ian
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)
Posted by Paul Lindner <li...@inuus.com>.
+1 as well..
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
> Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
> Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations
> of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
> applications.
>
> Vote Thread.
> http://markmail.org/thread/mrk4uwe7mg5e3uho
>
>
>
> Proposed release:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-002//org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.0-incubating/
>
> SVN Tag is
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shindig/tags/shindig-project-1.0-incubating/
> revision 780648
>
>
> Vote open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ian
>
Re: [VOTE ABANDONED] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0
(RC4)
Posted by Sylvain Wallez <sy...@apache.org>.
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Ian Boston<ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>> ...If there is a reason why members of the IPMC have decided not to vote on
>> this release, I would like to hear them, before spending the time doing
>> another release and wasting the IPMC's time...
>>
>
> I can't speak for others, but for me it's been plain lack of time to
> take a serious look at that release - sorry about that.
>
Same here. Because of lack of time, I have totally neglected my mentor
duties and must apologize for that.
I digged in the source tarball and it looks good to me, not considering
the technical aspects for which I trust the Shindig devs judgement.
There's only one point I'm not sure about, which is the dependency on
the LGPL'ed Hibernate in the samples. Now it's an optional dependency,
that is furthermore only materialized in the JPA configuration and not
in Java code. So I guess it's fine.
So here's my late binding +1.
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez - http://bluxte.net
Re: [VOTE ABANDONED] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0
(RC4)
Posted by Sylvain Wallez <sy...@apache.org>.
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Ian Boston<ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>> ...If there is a reason why members of the IPMC have decided not to vote on
>> this release, I would like to hear them, before spending the time doing
>> another release and wasting the IPMC's time...
>>
>
> I can't speak for others, but for me it's been plain lack of time to
> take a serious look at that release - sorry about that.
>
Same here. Because of lack of time, I have totally neglected my mentor
duties and must apologize for that.
I digged in the source tarball and it looks good to me, not considering
the technical aspects for which I trust the Shindig devs judgement.
There's only one point I'm not sure about, which is the dependency on
the LGPL'ed Hibernate in the samples. Now it's an optional dependency,
that is furthermore only materialized in the JPA configuration and not
in Java code. So I guess it's fine.
So here's my late binding +1.
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez - http://bluxte.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE ABANDONED] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0
(RC4)
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Ian Boston<ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
> ...If there is a reason why members of the IPMC have decided not to vote on
> this release, I would like to hear them, before spending the time doing
> another release and wasting the IPMC's time...
I can't speak for others, but for me it's been plain lack of time to
take a serious look at that release - sorry about that.
According to http://incubator.apache.org/shindig/team-list.html
Shindig has seven mentors, which should all be part of the IPMC. By
being mentors, those people agreed to help Shindig progress towards
graduation, if three of them jump in to check and approve releases
you'll be all set.
-Bertrand
Re: [VOTE ABANDONED] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0
(RC4)
Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 09:28 +0100, Ian Boston wrote:
> Hi,
> This vote has now been in progress for 14 days and has not received
> the necessary number of votes from the IPMC to make a release. There
> has been 1 +1 binding vote, 1 +2 non-binding vote and no other votes.
> The vote on shindig-dev resulted in 7 +1 binding votes, no +0 or -1's
>
> > Votes so far
> > Paul Lindner +1 (non binding)
> > Ian Boston +1 (non binding)
> Ant Elder +1 (binding)
>
> Given the period of time that this vote has been open, it is unlikely
> that any more votes will be received and therefore I am closing this
> vote as abandoned.
I am aware of this vote and planned to get to it by the end of today.
The vote came at a bad time for me - one week overseas with no internet
access followed by moving home, with no cell access nor broadband for a
week. I'm just recovering now. Added to that, I'm not so clued up when
it comes to doing releases at Apache - it isn't one of my strengths.
As I say, I will get to my vote later today.
Personally though, I'd appreciate hearing sebb's opinion, as it was he
who had the most objections to the previous vote.
Upayavira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE ABANDONED] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0
(RC4)
Posted by Bernd Fondermann <be...@googlemail.com>.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:28, Ian Boston<ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
> This vote has now been in progress for 14 days and has not received the
> necessary number of votes from the IPMC to make a release. There has been 1
> +1 binding vote, 1 +2 non-binding vote and no other votes. The vote on
> shindig-dev resulted in 7 +1 binding votes, no +0 or -1's
>
>> Votes so far
>> Paul Lindner +1 (non binding)
>> Ian Boston +1 (non binding)
>
> Ant Elder +1 (binding)
>
> Given the period of time that this vote has been open, it is unlikely that
> any more votes will be received and therefore I am closing this vote as
> abandoned.
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> If there is a reason why members of the IPMC have decided not to vote on
> this release, I would like to hear them, before spending the time doing
> another release and wasting the IPMC's time. I will obviously fix the
> confirmed non blocker issues identified by Sebb, but the PPMC and Shindig
> community has been wanting and trying to release since January and the
> expenditure of more effort appears futile *if* there is something
> fundamentally wrong with the release that is not being said.
>
> Thank you
> Ian Boston.
Who are your mentors? There should be at least three of them. They
should be recorded on the Shinding website.
Please look at other podlings website for what has to be recorded in
the "Project Info" section of that your website, namely mentors and
committers.
If you have trouble contacting your mentors or any other question you
cannot resolve within the project, don't hesistate to ask on
general@incubator.apache.org.
HTH,
Bernd
>
>
>
>
> On 8 Jun 2009, at 10:24, Ian Boston wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> This vote has been in progress for more than 72 hours now. AFICT although
>> we have a number of non binding votes from the PPMC, we have no votes from
>> the Incubator PMC.
>>
>>
>>
>> Votes so far
>> Paul Lindner +1 (non binding)
>> Ian Boston +1 (non binding)
>>
>> There were some other non binding votes cast by members Shindig community,
>> but unfortunately the did not make it to general@incubator
>>
>> Having read the voting documentation, which does not mention lazy
>> consensus for releases, I suspect that we should just abandon this vote and
>> start all over again.
>>
>> However before I do that, I would like some advice from the Incubator PMC
>> indicating that is the right thing to do?
>>
>>
>> Thank you
>> Ian
>>
>>
>> On 4 Jun 2009, at 12:28, Ian Boston wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
>>> Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
>>> Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations
>>> of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
>>> applications.
>>>
>>> Vote Thread.
>>> http://markmail.org/thread/mrk4uwe7mg5e3uho
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Proposed release:
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-002//org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.0-incubating/
>>>
>>> SVN Tag is
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shindig/tags/shindig-project-1.0-incubating/
>>> revision 780648
>>>
>>>
>>> Vote open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Ian
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE ABANDONED] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0
(RC4)
Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 09:28 +0100, Ian Boston wrote:
> Hi,
> This vote has now been in progress for 14 days and has not received
> the necessary number of votes from the IPMC to make a release. There
> has been 1 +1 binding vote, 1 +2 non-binding vote and no other votes.
> The vote on shindig-dev resulted in 7 +1 binding votes, no +0 or -1's
>
> > Votes so far
> > Paul Lindner +1 (non binding)
> > Ian Boston +1 (non binding)
> Ant Elder +1 (binding)
>
> Given the period of time that this vote has been open, it is unlikely
> that any more votes will be received and therefore I am closing this
> vote as abandoned.
I am aware of this vote and planned to get to it by the end of today.
The vote came at a bad time for me - one week overseas with no internet
access followed by moving home, with no cell access nor broadband for a
week. I'm just recovering now. Added to that, I'm not so clued up when
it comes to doing releases at Apache - it isn't one of my strengths.
As I say, I will get to my vote later today.
Personally though, I'd appreciate hearing sebb's opinion, as it was he
who had the most objections to the previous vote.
Upayavira
Re: [VOTE ABANDONED] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0
(RC4)
Posted by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>.
i think everyone has a limited amount of time available and will focus
their energy where they think it matters. For me, that means that I
try to help 'my podlings' to the best of my abilities and only get
involved in others when I have 'nothing better to do'. Your primary
source of support are the Mentors. If they are missing, then bring
that issue to the Incubator PMC to be resolved.
Cheers
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Ian Boston<ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
> This vote has now been in progress for 14 days and has not received the
> necessary number of votes from the IPMC to make a release. There has been 1
> +1 binding vote, 1 +2 non-binding vote and no other votes. The vote on
> shindig-dev resulted in 7 +1 binding votes, no +0 or -1's
>
>> Votes so far
>> Paul Lindner +1 (non binding)
>> Ian Boston +1 (non binding)
>
> Ant Elder +1 (binding)
>
> Given the period of time that this vote has been open, it is unlikely that
> any more votes will be received and therefore I am closing this vote as
> abandoned.
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> If there is a reason why members of the IPMC have decided not to vote on
> this release, I would like to hear them, before spending the time doing
> another release and wasting the IPMC's time. I will obviously fix the
> confirmed non blocker issues identified by Sebb, but the PPMC and Shindig
> community has been wanting and trying to release since January and the
> expenditure of more effort appears futile *if* there is something
> fundamentally wrong with the release that is not being said.
>
> Thank you
> Ian Boston.
>
>
>
>
> On 8 Jun 2009, at 10:24, Ian Boston wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> This vote has been in progress for more than 72 hours now. AFICT although
>> we have a number of non binding votes from the PPMC, we have no votes from
>> the Incubator PMC.
>>
>>
>>
>> Votes so far
>> Paul Lindner +1 (non binding)
>> Ian Boston +1 (non binding)
>>
>> There were some other non binding votes cast by members Shindig community,
>> but unfortunately the did not make it to general@incubator
>>
>> Having read the voting documentation, which does not mention lazy
>> consensus for releases, I suspect that we should just abandon this vote and
>> start all over again.
>>
>> However before I do that, I would like some advice from the Incubator PMC
>> indicating that is the right thing to do?
>>
>>
>> Thank you
>> Ian
>>
>>
>> On 4 Jun 2009, at 12:28, Ian Boston wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
>>> Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
>>> Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations
>>> of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
>>> applications.
>>>
>>> Vote Thread.
>>> http://markmail.org/thread/mrk4uwe7mg5e3uho
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Proposed release:
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-002//org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.0-incubating/
>>>
>>> SVN Tag is
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shindig/tags/shindig-project-1.0-incubating/
>>> revision 780648
>>>
>>>
>>> Vote open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Ian
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE ABANDONED] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0
(RC4)
Posted by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>.
i think everyone has a limited amount of time available and will focus
their energy where they think it matters. For me, that means that I
try to help 'my podlings' to the best of my abilities and only get
involved in others when I have 'nothing better to do'. Your primary
source of support are the Mentors. If they are missing, then bring
that issue to the Incubator PMC to be resolved.
Cheers
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Ian Boston<ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
> This vote has now been in progress for 14 days and has not received the
> necessary number of votes from the IPMC to make a release. There has been 1
> +1 binding vote, 1 +2 non-binding vote and no other votes. The vote on
> shindig-dev resulted in 7 +1 binding votes, no +0 or -1's
>
>> Votes so far
>> Paul Lindner +1 (non binding)
>> Ian Boston +1 (non binding)
>
> Ant Elder +1 (binding)
>
> Given the period of time that this vote has been open, it is unlikely that
> any more votes will be received and therefore I am closing this vote as
> abandoned.
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> If there is a reason why members of the IPMC have decided not to vote on
> this release, I would like to hear them, before spending the time doing
> another release and wasting the IPMC's time. I will obviously fix the
> confirmed non blocker issues identified by Sebb, but the PPMC and Shindig
> community has been wanting and trying to release since January and the
> expenditure of more effort appears futile *if* there is something
> fundamentally wrong with the release that is not being said.
>
> Thank you
> Ian Boston.
>
>
>
>
> On 8 Jun 2009, at 10:24, Ian Boston wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> This vote has been in progress for more than 72 hours now. AFICT although
>> we have a number of non binding votes from the PPMC, we have no votes from
>> the Incubator PMC.
>>
>>
>>
>> Votes so far
>> Paul Lindner +1 (non binding)
>> Ian Boston +1 (non binding)
>>
>> There were some other non binding votes cast by members Shindig community,
>> but unfortunately the did not make it to general@incubator
>>
>> Having read the voting documentation, which does not mention lazy
>> consensus for releases, I suspect that we should just abandon this vote and
>> start all over again.
>>
>> However before I do that, I would like some advice from the Incubator PMC
>> indicating that is the right thing to do?
>>
>>
>> Thank you
>> Ian
>>
>>
>> On 4 Jun 2009, at 12:28, Ian Boston wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
>>> Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
>>> Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations
>>> of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
>>> applications.
>>>
>>> Vote Thread.
>>> http://markmail.org/thread/mrk4uwe7mg5e3uho
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Proposed release:
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-002//org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.0-incubating/
>>>
>>> SVN Tag is
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shindig/tags/shindig-project-1.0-incubating/
>>> revision 780648
>>>
>>>
>>> Vote open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Ian
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
Re: [VOTE ABANDONED] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0
(RC4)
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Ian Boston<ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
> ...If there is a reason why members of the IPMC have decided not to vote on
> this release, I would like to hear them, before spending the time doing
> another release and wasting the IPMC's time...
I can't speak for others, but for me it's been plain lack of time to
take a serious look at that release - sorry about that.
According to http://incubator.apache.org/shindig/team-list.html
Shindig has seven mentors, which should all be part of the IPMC. By
being mentors, those people agreed to help Shindig progress towards
graduation, if three of them jump in to check and approve releases
you'll be all set.
-Bertrand
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
[VOTE ABANDONED] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)
Posted by Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk>.
Hi,
This vote has now been in progress for 14 days and has not received
the necessary number of votes from the IPMC to make a release. There
has been 1 +1 binding vote, 1 +2 non-binding vote and no other votes.
The vote on shindig-dev resulted in 7 +1 binding votes, no +0 or -1's
> Votes so far
> Paul Lindner +1 (non binding)
> Ian Boston +1 (non binding)
Ant Elder +1 (binding)
Given the period of time that this vote has been open, it is unlikely
that any more votes will be received and therefore I am closing this
vote as abandoned.
------------------------------------
If there is a reason why members of the IPMC have decided not to vote
on this release, I would like to hear them, before spending the time
doing another release and wasting the IPMC's time. I will obviously
fix the confirmed non blocker issues identified by Sebb, but the PPMC
and Shindig community has been wanting and trying to release since
January and the expenditure of more effort appears futile *if* there
is something fundamentally wrong with the release that is not being
said.
Thank you
Ian Boston.
On 8 Jun 2009, at 10:24, Ian Boston wrote:
> Hi,
> This vote has been in progress for more than 72 hours now. AFICT
> although we have a number of non binding votes from the PPMC, we
> have no votes from the Incubator PMC.
>
>
>
> Votes so far
> Paul Lindner +1 (non binding)
> Ian Boston +1 (non binding)
>
> There were some other non binding votes cast by members Shindig
> community, but unfortunately the did not make it to general@incubator
>
> Having read the voting documentation, which does not mention lazy
> consensus for releases, I suspect that we should just abandon this
> vote and start all over again.
>
> However before I do that, I would like some advice from the
> Incubator PMC indicating that is the right thing to do?
>
>
> Thank you
> Ian
>
>
> On 4 Jun 2009, at 12:28, Ian Boston wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
>> Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
>> Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and
>> implementations
>> of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
>> applications.
>>
>> Vote Thread.
>> http://markmail.org/thread/mrk4uwe7mg5e3uho
>>
>>
>>
>> Proposed release:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-002//org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.0-incubating/
>>
>> SVN Tag is
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shindig/tags/shindig-project-1.0-incubating/
>> revision 780648
>>
>>
>> Vote open for 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ian
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)
Posted by Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk>.
On 8 Jun 2009, at 14:04, ant elder wrote:
>> Having read the voting documentation, which does not mention lazy
>> consensus
>> for releases, I suspect that we should just abandon this vote and
>> start all
>> over again.
>>
>> However before I do that, I would like some advice from the
>> Incubator PMC
>> indicating that is the right thing to do?
>>
>
> I don't think you should give up on this vote yet, its only been 4
> days and that includes a weekend so as theres been no -1 yet i think
> it'd be worth trying to get another couple of votes for a bit longer.
>
> ...ant
Thank you, (and for the +1) I wont close the vote just yet.
Ian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
+1 to release. I've just had a look and this looks ok to me, even with
those few generated files getting included in the distro i think its
ok to release this as-is. One comment inline below...
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Ian Boston<ie...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
> This vote has been in progress for more than 72 hours now. AFICT although we
> have a number of non binding votes from the PPMC, we have no votes from the
> Incubator PMC.
>
>
>
> Votes so far
> Paul Lindner +1 (non binding)
> Ian Boston +1 (non binding)
>
> There were some other non binding votes cast by members Shindig community,
> but unfortunately the did not make it to general@incubator
>
> Having read the voting documentation, which does not mention lazy consensus
> for releases, I suspect that we should just abandon this vote and start all
> over again.
>
> However before I do that, I would like some advice from the Incubator PMC
> indicating that is the right thing to do?
>
I don't think you should give up on this vote yet, its only been 4
days and that includes a weekend so as theres been no -1 yet i think
it'd be worth trying to get another couple of votes for a bit longer.
...ant
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
[VOTE ABANDONED] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)
Posted by Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk>.
Hi,
This vote has now been in progress for 14 days and has not received
the necessary number of votes from the IPMC to make a release. There
has been 1 +1 binding vote, 1 +2 non-binding vote and no other votes.
The vote on shindig-dev resulted in 7 +1 binding votes, no +0 or -1's
> Votes so far
> Paul Lindner +1 (non binding)
> Ian Boston +1 (non binding)
Ant Elder +1 (binding)
Given the period of time that this vote has been open, it is unlikely
that any more votes will be received and therefore I am closing this
vote as abandoned.
------------------------------------
If there is a reason why members of the IPMC have decided not to vote
on this release, I would like to hear them, before spending the time
doing another release and wasting the IPMC's time. I will obviously
fix the confirmed non blocker issues identified by Sebb, but the PPMC
and Shindig community has been wanting and trying to release since
January and the expenditure of more effort appears futile *if* there
is something fundamentally wrong with the release that is not being
said.
Thank you
Ian Boston.
On 8 Jun 2009, at 10:24, Ian Boston wrote:
> Hi,
> This vote has been in progress for more than 72 hours now. AFICT
> although we have a number of non binding votes from the PPMC, we
> have no votes from the Incubator PMC.
>
>
>
> Votes so far
> Paul Lindner +1 (non binding)
> Ian Boston +1 (non binding)
>
> There were some other non binding votes cast by members Shindig
> community, but unfortunately the did not make it to general@incubator
>
> Having read the voting documentation, which does not mention lazy
> consensus for releases, I suspect that we should just abandon this
> vote and start all over again.
>
> However before I do that, I would like some advice from the
> Incubator PMC indicating that is the right thing to do?
>
>
> Thank you
> Ian
>
>
> On 4 Jun 2009, at 12:28, Ian Boston wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
>> Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
>> Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and
>> implementations
>> of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
>> applications.
>>
>> Vote Thread.
>> http://markmail.org/thread/mrk4uwe7mg5e3uho
>>
>>
>>
>> Proposed release:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-002//org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.0-incubating/
>>
>> SVN Tag is
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shindig/tags/shindig-project-1.0-incubating/
>> revision 780648
>>
>>
>> Vote open for 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ian
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)
Posted by Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk>.
Hi,
This vote has been in progress for more than 72 hours now. AFICT
although we have a number of non binding votes from the PPMC, we have
no votes from the Incubator PMC.
Votes so far
Paul Lindner +1 (non binding)
Ian Boston +1 (non binding)
There were some other non binding votes cast by members Shindig
community, but unfortunately the did not make it to general@incubator
Having read the voting documentation, which does not mention lazy
consensus for releases, I suspect that we should just abandon this
vote and start all over again.
However before I do that, I would like some advice from the Incubator
PMC indicating that is the right thing to do?
Thank you
Ian
On 4 Jun 2009, at 12:28, Ian Boston wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
> Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
> Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations
> of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
> applications.
>
> Vote Thread.
> http://markmail.org/thread/mrk4uwe7mg5e3uho
>
>
>
> Proposed release:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-002//org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.0-incubating/
>
> SVN Tag is
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shindig/tags/shindig-project-1.0-incubating/
> revision 780648
>
>
> Vote open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)
Posted by Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk>.
Hi,
This vote has been in progress for more than 72 hours now. AFICT
although we have a number of non binding votes from the PPMC, we have
no votes from the Incubator PMC.
Votes so far
Paul Lindner +1 (non binding)
Ian Boston +1 (non binding)
There were some other non binding votes cast by members Shindig
community, but unfortunately the did not make it to general@incubator
Having read the voting documentation, which does not mention lazy
consensus for releases, I suspect that we should just abandon this
vote and start all over again.
However before I do that, I would like some advice from the Incubator
PMC indicating that is the right thing to do?
Thank you
Ian
On 4 Jun 2009, at 12:28, Ian Boston wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
> Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
> Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations
> of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
> applications.
>
> Vote Thread.
> http://markmail.org/thread/mrk4uwe7mg5e3uho
>
>
>
> Proposed release:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-002//org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.0-incubating/
>
> SVN Tag is
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shindig/tags/shindig-project-1.0-incubating/
> revision 780648
>
>
> Vote open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ian