You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "Dmitri Blinov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/07/21 10:34:04 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (JEXL-151) operators to manipulate
j.u.Collection
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14634769#comment-14634769 ]
Dmitri Blinov commented on JEXL-151:
------------------------------------
For now I have managed to overload operators + and - via JexlArithmetic to support manipulation of Collection items, it's odd-looking a bit, but works. Another case is =~ operator which is implemented inside Interpreter.java and since can not be overloaded, but as I see it requires only three lines of code to implement
// try contains on collection
if (right instanceof Collection<?>) {
+ if (left instanceof Collection<?>)
+ return ((Collection<?>) right).containsAll((Collection<?>) left);
+ else
return ((Collection<?>) right).contains(left);
}
Can we include it in near future?
> operators to manipulate j.u.Collection
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: JEXL-151
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-151
> Project: Commons JEXL
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: Dmitri Blinov
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Later
>
>
> New operators to add or remove collection items to/from Collection. Operators can be named as += and -= respectively, or any other way. Operator += can be mapped to Collection.addAll(Collection c) if right argument is Collection or to Collection.add(Object o) otherwise. Operator -= can be mapped to Collection.removeAll(Collection c) if right argument is Collection or to Collection.remove(Object o) otherwise. Extend operators =~ (!~) to support CollectionA =~ CollectionB usage, in which case it should map to B.containsAll(A) operation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)