Re: Discovery-based SCA Domain for OSGi RFC 119

[ant elder <an...@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Simon Laws<si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> snip...
>
>> 1) Do we need to register the endpoint references? For callbacks, we can
>> just publish the endpoint for the callback.
>
> Not now but his was for the future if we need to establish what
> endpoint references are out there when a new service gets added.
> Corner case so we can ignore for the time being. Maybe we should just
> record them during the "find"
>

What is the status of the endpoint references in the EndpointRegistry?
Looking at the code nothing is using the findEndpointReference or
getEndpointReferences methods so i wonder if we should remove the
methods until we have a need for them?

   ...ant

Re: Discovery-based SCA Domain for OSGi RFC 119

[Giorgio Zoppi <gi...@gmail.com>]

I guess that the main point for have a distributed endpoint resolution
or at least
my motivation is to be able to detect faults and trying to have an
architecture scalable and fault resilent (yes, i know a lot of work is
needed for accomplish that goal).  Instead i'd use a centralized
domain is for enforcing QoS policies, both options might to be present
in order to allow the SOA IT Architect a right choice that fits its
needs.

Just 1c,
Giorgio.

-- 
Quiero ser el rayo de sol que cada día te despierta
para hacerte respirar y vivir en me.
"Favola -Moda".

Re: Discovery-based SCA Domain for OSGi RFC 119

[Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>]

Can we leave them in for the time being. I'm finding it useful for
testing at the moment. A central place where I can look at what
endpoint references are active as I mess about with the builders.

Simon