You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to java-dev@axis.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2003/06/13 09:52:04 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19544] - WSDL2Java generates uncompilable code for simpleTypes redefining a complexType

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19544>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19544

WSDL2Java generates uncompilable code for simpleTypes redefining a complexType





------- Additional Comments From gauwin@atl.dtrd.de  2003-06-13 07:52 -------
It seems that this bug is invalid, but I'd like to have your opinion on that point.

I've read the SOAP specification about Simple Types
(http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP/#_Toc478383514) and from what I understand it is
forbidden to use a user-defined type for the restriction type :

"For simple types, SOAP adopts all the types found in the section "Built-in
datatypes" of the "XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes" Specification [11], both the
value and lexical spaces."