You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@storm.apache.org by "P. Taylor Goetz" <pt...@gmail.com> on 2015/06/01 20:37:05 UTC
[DISCUSS] Drop Support for Java 1.6 in Storm 0.10.0
CC user@
I’d like to poll the community about the possibility of dropping support for Java 1.6 in the Storm 0.10.0 release. To date, we have been very conservative in terms of supporting 1.6, and I don’t see much of an issue moving up to 1.7, but I’d like to get a broader view.
If we were to move up to 1.7, it would make the upcoming 0.9.5 version the last release compatible with Java 1.6.
Any strong opinions? Would anyone object?
-Taylor
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Support for Java 1.6 in Storm 0.10.0
Posted by Andrew Xor <an...@gmail.com>.
I am all for it, I've been using storm with Java 8 for quite some time
without major issues. The performance aspect of it is better as well.
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 10:03 PM Matthias J. Sax <
mjsax@informatik.hu-berlin.de> wrote:
> I thinks it is a good idea to drop Java 6. It reached it's life cycle
> already 2 year ago.
>
> -Matthias
>
>
> On 06/01/2015 08:37 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> > CC user@
> >
> > I’d like to poll the community about the possibility of dropping support
> for Java 1.6 in the Storm 0.10.0 release. To date, we have been very
> conservative in terms of supporting 1.6, and I don’t see much of an issue
> moving up to 1.7, but I’d like to get a broader view.
> >
> > If we were to move up to 1.7, it would make the upcoming 0.9.5 version
> the last release compatible with Java 1.6.
> >
> > Any strong opinions? Would anyone object?
> >
> > -Taylor
> >
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Support for Java 1.6 in Storm 0.10.0
Posted by "Matthias J. Sax" <mj...@informatik.hu-berlin.de>.
I thinks it is a good idea to drop Java 6. It reached it's life cycle
already 2 year ago.
-Matthias
On 06/01/2015 08:37 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> CC user@
>
> I’d like to poll the community about the possibility of dropping support for Java 1.6 in the Storm 0.10.0 release. To date, we have been very conservative in terms of supporting 1.6, and I don’t see much of an issue moving up to 1.7, but I’d like to get a broader view.
>
> If we were to move up to 1.7, it would make the upcoming 0.9.5 version the last release compatible with Java 1.6.
>
> Any strong opinions? Would anyone object?
>
> -Taylor
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Support for Java 1.6 in Storm 0.10.0
Posted by 임정택 <ka...@gmail.com>.
Great for dropping support 1.6.
Thanks.
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
2015년 6월 2일 화요일, P. Taylor Goetz<pt...@gmail.com>님이 작성한 메시지:
> CC user@
>
> I’d like to poll the community about the possibility of dropping support
> for Java 1.6 in the Storm 0.10.0 release. To date, we have been very
> conservative in terms of supporting 1.6, and I don’t see much of an issue
> moving up to 1.7, but I’d like to get a broader view.
>
> If we were to move up to 1.7, it would make the upcoming 0.9.5 version the
> last release compatible with Java 1.6.
>
> Any strong opinions? Would anyone object?
>
> -Taylor
>
--
Name : 임 정택
Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Support for Java 1.6 in Storm 0.10.0
Posted by 임정택 <ka...@gmail.com>.
Great for dropping support 1.6.
Thanks.
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
2015년 6월 2일 화요일, P. Taylor Goetz<pt...@gmail.com>님이 작성한 메시지:
> CC user@
>
> I’d like to poll the community about the possibility of dropping support
> for Java 1.6 in the Storm 0.10.0 release. To date, we have been very
> conservative in terms of supporting 1.6, and I don’t see much of an issue
> moving up to 1.7, but I’d like to get a broader view.
>
> If we were to move up to 1.7, it would make the upcoming 0.9.5 version the
> last release compatible with Java 1.6.
>
> Any strong opinions? Would anyone object?
>
> -Taylor
>
--
Name : 임 정택
Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Support for Java 1.6 in Storm 0.10.0
Posted by "Grant Overby (groverby)" <gr...@cisco.com>.
We¹re using it with 1.7, so no objection.
Grant Overby
Software Engineer
Cisco.com <http://www.cisco.com/>
groverby@cisco.com
Mobile: 865 724 4910
Think before you print.This email may contain confidential and privileged
material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use,
distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are
not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient),
please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this
message.
Please click here
<http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html> for
Company Registration Information.
On 6/1/15, 2:37 PM, "P. Taylor Goetz" <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>CC user@
>
>I¹d like to poll the community about the possibility of dropping support
>for Java 1.6 in the Storm 0.10.0 release. To date, we have been very
>conservative in terms of supporting 1.6, and I don¹t see much of an issue
>moving up to 1.7, but I¹d like to get a broader view.
>
>If we were to move up to 1.7, it would make the upcoming 0.9.5 version
>the last release compatible with Java 1.6.
>
>Any strong opinions? Would anyone object?
>
>-Taylor
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Support for Java 1.6 in Storm 0.10.0
Posted by "Matthias J. Sax" <mj...@informatik.hu-berlin.de>.
I thinks it is a good idea to drop Java 6. It reached it's life cycle
already 2 year ago.
-Matthias
On 06/01/2015 08:37 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> CC user@
>
> I’d like to poll the community about the possibility of dropping support for Java 1.6 in the Storm 0.10.0 release. To date, we have been very conservative in terms of supporting 1.6, and I don’t see much of an issue moving up to 1.7, but I’d like to get a broader view.
>
> If we were to move up to 1.7, it would make the upcoming 0.9.5 version the last release compatible with Java 1.6.
>
> Any strong opinions? Would anyone object?
>
> -Taylor
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Support for Java 1.6 in Storm 0.10.0
Posted by Mark Reddy <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1 for dropping 1.6 support in 0.10.0.
Mark
On 2 June 2015 at 01:10, Javier Gonzalez <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No objection here. I work at a big company where upgrades move fast like
> glaciers ;) and even we are up to java7.
>
> Regards,
> JG
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:37 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> CC user@
>>
>> I’d like to poll the community about the possibility of dropping support
>> for Java 1.6 in the Storm 0.10.0 release. To date, we have been very
>> conservative in terms of supporting 1.6, and I don’t see much of an issue
>> moving up to 1.7, but I’d like to get a broader view.
>>
>> If we were to move up to 1.7, it would make the upcoming 0.9.5 version
>> the last release compatible with Java 1.6.
>>
>> Any strong opinions? Would anyone object?
>>
>> -Taylor
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Javier González Nicolini
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Support for Java 1.6 in Storm 0.10.0
Posted by Javier Gonzalez <ja...@gmail.com>.
No objection here. I work at a big company where upgrades move fast like
glaciers ;) and even we are up to java7.
Regards,
JG
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:37 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> CC user@
>
> I’d like to poll the community about the possibility of dropping support
> for Java 1.6 in the Storm 0.10.0 release. To date, we have been very
> conservative in terms of supporting 1.6, and I don’t see much of an issue
> moving up to 1.7, but I’d like to get a broader view.
>
> If we were to move up to 1.7, it would make the upcoming 0.9.5 version the
> last release compatible with Java 1.6.
>
> Any strong opinions? Would anyone object?
>
> -Taylor
>
--
Javier González Nicolini