You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jira@kafka.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/10/25 16:17:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-9098) Name Repartition Filter, Source,
and Sink Processors
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16959900#comment-16959900 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on KAFKA-9098:
---------------------------------------
bbejeck commented on pull request #7598: KAFKA-9098: When users name repartition topic, use the name for the repartition filter, source and sink node.
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/7598
When users specify a name for a repartition topic, we should use the same name for the repartition filter, source, and sink nodes. With the addition of KIP-307 if users go to the effort of naming every node in the topology having processor nodes with generated names is inconsistent behavior.
*Summary of testing strategy (including rationale)
for the feature or bug fix. Unit and/or integration
tests are expected for any behaviour change and
system tests should be considered for larger changes.*
### Committer Checklist (excluded from commit message)
- [ ] Verify design and implementation
- [ ] Verify test coverage and CI build status
- [ ] Verify documentation (including upgrade notes)
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
> Name Repartition Filter, Source, and Sink Processors
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-9098
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9098
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: streams
> Affects Versions: 2.2.0, 2.3.0
> Reporter: Bill Bejeck
> Assignee: Bill Bejeck
> Priority: Major
>
> When users provide a name for repartition topics, we should the same name as the base for the filter, source and sink operators. While this does not break a topology, users providing names for all processors in a DSL topology may find the generated names for the repartition topics filter, source, and sink operators as inconsistent with the naming approach.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)