You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@streampipes.apache.org by Philipp Zehnder <ze...@apache.org> on 2020/11/29 18:19:13 UTC
[DISCUSS] Naming of internal sinks
Hi,
Patrick has already created a page with improvements in Confluence for bigger changes.
I think a quick improvement would be to standardize some of the names.
Currently we have three data sinks that we use internally called: “Notification”, “Data Lake”, and “Dashboard Sink”.
The data of those sinks can be viewed by selecting “Notifications”, “Data Explorer”, “Dashboard” on the left.
There we also use different Icons than for the sink icons.
My suggestion would be to harmonize the naming and the icons.
* Alternative 1: “Notification”, “Data Explorer”, and “Live Dashboard”
* Alternative 2: “Internal Notification”, “Internal Data Explorer”, and “Internal Live Dashboard”
* Alternative 3: “StreamPipes Notification”, “StreamPipes Data Explorer”, and “StreamPipes Live Dashboard”
* Alternative 4: “Notification”, “Historic Data Explorer”, and “Live Dashboard”
What is your opinion?
Philipp
Re: [DISCUSS] Naming of internal sinks
Posted by Patrick Wiener <wi...@apache.org>.
Hi all,
Im with the others - I would rather go for option 1 with the suggestions of Grainier
using a small SP Icon (maybe top left part). Otherwise the name is very long as well.
Patrick
> Am 30.11.2020 um 02:13 schrieb Grainier Perera <gr...@apache.org>:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I think we shouldn't use `Internal` prefix (which might give a wrong idea
> to the end-user). So, I'm also in favour of option 3, or option 1 with
> icons to clearly show that those are internal/special components.
>
> Grainier Perera.
>
>
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 at 03:25, Dominik Riemer <ri...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Philipp,
>>
>> I think it's a good idea to rename the sinks according to your optoin 3.
>> I'd also suggest to modify the icons so that it is clear that these sinks
>> affect internal components (e.g., by adding a small StreamPipes logo along
>> with the name of the sink).
>>
>> On 2020/11/29 18:19:13, Philipp Zehnder <ze...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Patrick has already created a page with improvements in Confluence for
>> bigger changes.
>>> I think a quick improvement would be to standardize some of the names.
>>>
>>> Currently we have three data sinks that we use internally called:
>> “Notification”, “Data Lake”, and “Dashboard Sink”.
>>> The data of those sinks can be viewed by selecting “Notifications”,
>> “Data Explorer”, “Dashboard” on the left.
>>> There we also use different Icons than for the sink icons.
>>>
>>> My suggestion would be to harmonize the naming and the icons.
>>>
>>> * Alternative 1: “Notification”, “Data Explorer”, and “Live Dashboard”
>>> * Alternative 2: “Internal Notification”, “Internal Data Explorer”, and
>> “Internal Live Dashboard”
>>> * Alternative 3: “StreamPipes Notification”, “StreamPipes Data
>> Explorer”, and “StreamPipes Live Dashboard”
>>> * Alternative 4: “Notification”, “Historic Data Explorer”, and “Live
>> Dashboard”
>>>
>>> What is your opinion?
>>>
>>> Philipp
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Naming of internal sinks
Posted by Grainier Perera <gr...@apache.org>.
Hi all,
I think we shouldn't use `Internal` prefix (which might give a wrong idea
to the end-user). So, I'm also in favour of option 3, or option 1 with
icons to clearly show that those are internal/special components.
Grainier Perera.
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 at 03:25, Dominik Riemer <ri...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Philipp,
>
> I think it's a good idea to rename the sinks according to your optoin 3.
> I'd also suggest to modify the icons so that it is clear that these sinks
> affect internal components (e.g., by adding a small StreamPipes logo along
> with the name of the sink).
>
> On 2020/11/29 18:19:13, Philipp Zehnder <ze...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Patrick has already created a page with improvements in Confluence for
> bigger changes.
> > I think a quick improvement would be to standardize some of the names.
> >
> > Currently we have three data sinks that we use internally called:
> “Notification”, “Data Lake”, and “Dashboard Sink”.
> > The data of those sinks can be viewed by selecting “Notifications”,
> “Data Explorer”, “Dashboard” on the left.
> > There we also use different Icons than for the sink icons.
> >
> > My suggestion would be to harmonize the naming and the icons.
> >
> > * Alternative 1: “Notification”, “Data Explorer”, and “Live Dashboard”
> > * Alternative 2: “Internal Notification”, “Internal Data Explorer”, and
> “Internal Live Dashboard”
> > * Alternative 3: “StreamPipes Notification”, “StreamPipes Data
> Explorer”, and “StreamPipes Live Dashboard”
> > * Alternative 4: “Notification”, “Historic Data Explorer”, and “Live
> Dashboard”
> >
> > What is your opinion?
> >
> > Philipp
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Naming of internal sinks
Posted by Dominik Riemer <ri...@apache.org>.
Hi Philipp,
I think it's a good idea to rename the sinks according to your optoin 3. I'd also suggest to modify the icons so that it is clear that these sinks affect internal components (e.g., by adding a small StreamPipes logo along with the name of the sink).
On 2020/11/29 18:19:13, Philipp Zehnder <ze...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Patrick has already created a page with improvements in Confluence for bigger changes.
> I think a quick improvement would be to standardize some of the names.
>
> Currently we have three data sinks that we use internally called: “Notification”, “Data Lake”, and “Dashboard Sink”.
> The data of those sinks can be viewed by selecting “Notifications”, “Data Explorer”, “Dashboard” on the left.
> There we also use different Icons than for the sink icons.
>
> My suggestion would be to harmonize the naming and the icons.
>
> * Alternative 1: “Notification”, “Data Explorer”, and “Live Dashboard”
> * Alternative 2: “Internal Notification”, “Internal Data Explorer”, and “Internal Live Dashboard”
> * Alternative 3: “StreamPipes Notification”, “StreamPipes Data Explorer”, and “StreamPipes Live Dashboard”
> * Alternative 4: “Notification”, “Historic Data Explorer”, and “Live Dashboard”
>
> What is your opinion?
>
> Philipp