Re: YAB ahead again :)

[Mike Gratton <mi...@vee.net>]

Dawid Weiss wrote:
> 
> you  must  develop  your  own  plug-in (why not a native-interface to
> internet explorer for instance ;), capable of rendering css's and stuff.

Or, even better, use Mozilla's Java embedding API, so everyone can use 
it, and you get a decent rendering engine instead of a half-baked one.

^_^

Mike.

-- 
Mike Gratton <mi...@vee.net>
"Every motive escalate."
  Blatant self-promotion: <http://web.vee.net/>

Re: Re[2]: YAB ahead again :)

[Martin Holz <ho...@fiz-chemie.de>]

Dawid Weiss wrote:
> >> you  must  develop  your  own  plug-in (why not a native-interface to
> >> internet explorer for instance ;), capable of rendering css's and stuff.
>
> MG> Or, even better, use Mozilla's Java embedding API, so everyone can use
> MG> it, and you get a decent rendering engine instead of a half-baked one.
>
>
> This  sounds  interesting :) See I'm not such a Mozilla/Netscape fan, their
> rendering  style  simply  doesn't  appeal  to me, but I guess it's a better
> solution  than  the  one  I proposed. Spare me the searching time, Mike and
> drop a link or two of the actual project which use it (if you know of any).


http://www.mozilla.org/projects/blackwood/webclient/codestock/what.htm

Re[2]: YAB ahead again :)

[Dawid Weiss <Da...@cs.put.poznan.pl>]

>> you  must  develop  your  own  plug-in (why not a native-interface to
>> internet explorer for instance ;), capable of rendering css's and stuff.

MG> Or, even better, use Mozilla's Java embedding API, so everyone can use 
MG> it, and you get a decent rendering engine instead of a half-baked one.


This  sounds  interesting :) See I'm not such a Mozilla/Netscape fan, their
rendering  style  simply  doesn't  appeal  to me, but I guess it's a better
solution  than  the  one  I proposed. Spare me the searching time, Mike and
drop a link or two of the actual project which use it (if you know of any).

Thanks,
Dawid