[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8963) Add configuration option to skip HFile archiving

["Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13961326#comment-13961326 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-8963:
----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12638896/HBASE-8963.trunk.v8.patch
  against trunk revision .
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12638896

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 11 new or modified tests.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

    {color:red}-1 javac{color}.  The patch appears to cause mvn compile goal to fail.

    {color:red}-1 findbugs{color}.  The patch appears to cause Findbugs (version 1.3.9) to fail.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:red}-1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch introduces the following lines longer than 100:
    +  public static void archiveRegion(Configuration conf, FileSystem fs, HRegionInfo info, HTableDescriptor htd)
+      Path tableDir, byte[] family, Collection<StoreFile> compactedFiles, HTableDescriptor htd) throws IOException {
+  private static List<File> resolveAndArchive(Configuration conf, FileSystem fs, Path baseArchiveDir,
+    if(conf.getBoolean(HFILE_SKIP_ARCHIVE_CONF_KEY, true) || ((htd != null) && htd.isSkipArchiveEnabled())){
+      HFileArchiver.archiveRegion(this.services.getConfiguration(), fs, regionA, getTableDescriptor(regionA.getTable()));
+      HFileArchiver.archiveRegion(this.services.getConfiguration(), fs, regionB, getTableDescriptor(regionB.getTable()));
+      HFileArchiver.archiveRegion(this.services.getConfiguration(), fs, parent, getTableDescriptor(parent.getTable()));
+    HFileArchiver.archiveRegion(conf, fs, region, this.services.getTableDescriptors().get(region.getTable()));
+  public void removeStoreFile(final HTableDescriptor htd, final String familyName, final Path filePath)
+  public void removeStoreFiles(final HTableDescriptor htd, final String familyName, final Collection<StoreFile> storeFiles)

  {color:green}+1 site{color}.  The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch.

     {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests:
     

Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9207//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9207//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Add configuration option to skip HFile archiving
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-8963
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8963
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ted Yu
>            Assignee: bharath v
>             Fix For: 0.99.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-8963.trunk.v1.patch, HBASE-8963.trunk.v2.patch, HBASE-8963.trunk.v3.patch, HBASE-8963.trunk.v4.patch, HBASE-8963.trunk.v5.patch, HBASE-8963.trunk.v6.patch, HBASE-8963.trunk.v7.patch, HBASE-8963.trunk.v8.patch
>
>
> Currently HFileArchiver is always called when a table is dropped.
> A configuration option (either global or per table) should be provided so that archiving can be skipped when table is deleted.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)