You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Ted Yu (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/03/05 02:56:00 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (FLINK-7588) Document RocksDB tuning for
spinning disks
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16258309#comment-16258309 ]
Ted Yu edited comment on FLINK-7588 at 3/5/18 2:55 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------
bq. Be careful about whether you have enough memory to keep all bloom filters
Other than the above being tricky, the other guidelines are actionable .
was (Author: yuzhihong@gmail.com):
bq. Be careful about whether you have enough memory to keep all bloom filters
Other than the above being tricky, the other guidelines are actionable .
> Document RocksDB tuning for spinning disks
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-7588
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7588
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Documentation
> Reporter: Ted Yu
> Priority: Major
> Labels: performance
>
> In docs/ops/state/large_state_tuning.md , it was mentioned that:
> bq. the default configuration is tailored towards SSDs and performs suboptimal on spinning disks
> We should add recommendation targeting spinning disks:
> https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/RocksDB-Tuning-Guide#difference-of-spinning-disk
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)