You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu> on 2005/11/10 05:51:19 UTC
Specs: Individual specs also in J2EE...
So I notice that the JSR-88 code is in
geronimo-spec-j2ee-deployment-1.1-rc4.jar and also
geronimo-spec-j2ee-1.4-rc4.jar. I guess "spec-j2ee" is a rollup of
all (or most of) the others? Is there a preference for whether other
modules should depend on the individual spec modules or the overall
"spec-j2ee" module?
Aaron
Re: Specs: Individual specs also in J2EE...
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
+1 This really helps when people want to use the code standalone
But we must provide a rollup jar so our users don't have to hunt down
10 spec jars.
-dain
On Nov 9, 2005, at 11:40 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> I am of the same opinion.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> David Jencks wrote, On 11/9/2005 9:08 PM:
>
>> I have a REALLY REALLY REALLY strong preference that ALL geronimo
>> modules depend ONLY on the specs they actually use. I would
>> prefer that we don't build the universal spec jar or that we build
>> it after everything else is built and all the configurations are
>> built. I really prefer to know what specs a particular geronimo
>> module depends on.
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>> On Nov 9, 2005, at 8:51 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
>>
>>> So I notice that the JSR-88 code is in
>>> geronimo-spec-j2ee-deployment-1.1-rc4.jar and also
>>> geronimo-spec-j2ee-1.4-rc4.jar. I guess "spec-j2ee" is a rollup of
>>> all (or most of) the others? Is there a preference for whether
>>> other
>>> modules should depend on the individual spec modules or the overall
>>> "spec-j2ee" module?
>>>
>>> Aaron
>>>
>
Re: Specs: Individual specs also in J2EE...
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
I am of the same opinion.
Regards,
Alan
David Jencks wrote, On 11/9/2005 9:08 PM:
> I have a REALLY REALLY REALLY strong preference that ALL geronimo
> modules depend ONLY on the specs they actually use. I would prefer
> that we don't build the universal spec jar or that we build it after
> everything else is built and all the configurations are built. I
> really prefer to know what specs a particular geronimo module depends on.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Nov 9, 2005, at 8:51 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
>
>> So I notice that the JSR-88 code is in
>> geronimo-spec-j2ee-deployment-1.1-rc4.jar and also
>> geronimo-spec-j2ee-1.4-rc4.jar. I guess "spec-j2ee" is a rollup of
>> all (or most of) the others? Is there a preference for whether other
>> modules should depend on the individual spec modules or the overall
>> "spec-j2ee" module?
>>
>> Aaron
>>
Re: Specs: Individual specs also in J2EE...
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@gmail.com>.
>From a Maven point of view with transitive dependencies, this is
imperative. The universal jar should just be a distribution
convenience (if it is built at all).
- Brett
On 11/10/05, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I have a REALLY REALLY REALLY strong preference that ALL geronimo
> modules depend ONLY on the specs they actually use. I would prefer
> that we don't build the universal spec jar or that we build it after
> everything else is built and all the configurations are built. I
> really prefer to know what specs a particular geronimo module depends
> on.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Nov 9, 2005, at 8:51 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
>
> > So I notice that the JSR-88 code is in
> > geronimo-spec-j2ee-deployment-1.1-rc4.jar and also
> > geronimo-spec-j2ee-1.4-rc4.jar. I guess "spec-j2ee" is a rollup of
> > all (or most of) the others? Is there a preference for whether other
> > modules should depend on the individual spec modules or the overall
> > "spec-j2ee" module?
> >
> > Aaron
> >
>
>
Re: Specs: Individual specs also in J2EE...
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
I have a REALLY REALLY REALLY strong preference that ALL geronimo
modules depend ONLY on the specs they actually use. I would prefer
that we don't build the universal spec jar or that we build it after
everything else is built and all the configurations are built. I
really prefer to know what specs a particular geronimo module depends
on.
thanks
david jencks
On Nov 9, 2005, at 8:51 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> So I notice that the JSR-88 code is in
> geronimo-spec-j2ee-deployment-1.1-rc4.jar and also
> geronimo-spec-j2ee-1.4-rc4.jar. I guess "spec-j2ee" is a rollup of
> all (or most of) the others? Is there a preference for whether other
> modules should depend on the individual spec modules or the overall
> "spec-j2ee" module?
>
> Aaron
>
Re: Specs: Individual specs also in J2EE...
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
I think referring to one is simpler. That way exceptions will stand out. I'm
not sure I see a downside.
Aaron Mulder wrote:
> So I notice that the JSR-88 code is in
> geronimo-spec-j2ee-deployment-1.1-rc4.jar and also
> geronimo-spec-j2ee-1.4-rc4.jar. I guess "spec-j2ee" is a rollup of
> all (or most of) the others? Is there a preference for whether other
> modules should depend on the individual spec modules or the overall
> "spec-j2ee" module?
>
> Aaron
>
>
>