You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Benedict (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/08/05 10:30:04 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-9986) Remove SliceableUnfilteredRowIterator

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14655007#comment-14655007 ] 

Benedict commented on CASSANDRA-9986:
-------------------------------------

Unassigning, in case somebody else wants to take this before I have time.

> Remove SliceableUnfilteredRowIterator
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-9986
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9986
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Benedict
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.0.x
>
>
> After CASSANDRA-9932, there is only one instance where this class is needed, and that is {{SSTableIterator}}. It would be much simpler if, like in {{AbstractBTreePartition}}, the slices were passed into the {{SSTableIterator}} on construction. This would make the control flow easier to follow both: 
> * logically, because:
> **  memtables and sstables would have the same access pattern; and
> ** our SSTableIterator would not have two modes of (parallel) operation, which is kind of confusing (the slices are independent of the non-sliced iteration)
> * in the debugger, because we would have one fewer wrapping iterator



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)