You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Joseph (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/06/27 18:29:52 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15937) Figure out retry limit and timing for replication queue table operations

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15351544#comment-15351544 ] 

Joseph commented on HBASE-15937:
--------------------------------

I updated some information on the initialization and client RPC timeouts. Can you guys take a look and maybe offer some suggestions/comments? [~eclark] [~ashu210890] [~ghelmling]

> Figure out retry limit and timing for replication queue table operations
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-15937
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15937
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Replication
>            Reporter: Joseph
>            Assignee: Joseph
>
> ReplicationQueuesHBaseImpl will abort the server if any of its HBase Table writes/reads fails. We should figure out a reasonable retry limit and pause duration for these operations.
> As of now the timeouts look like: 
> Table initialization:
> 240 retries
> 1 minute pause (because the Master may not be initialized yet, createTable retries are immediately rejected by PleaseHoldException, so we should sleep in between RPC requests)
> 1 minute RPC timeouts
> Total: At minimum 2 hours of retries
> Normal Replication Table operations:
> 240 retries
> 100 millis pause (because we assume the cluster is in a more stable state, we assume most exceptions will be RPC timeouts, so I am using the standard RPC pause)
> 1 minute RPC timeouts
> Total: Assuming operations fail because of RPC timeouts, a minimum of 2 hours of retries. With just pauses we only have 24 seconds. 
> All of these timeouts are configurable too though.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)