You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Apache Spark (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/01/04 23:34:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-21525) ReceiverSupervisorImpl seems to ignore the error code when writing to the WAL

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16312202#comment-16312202 ] 

Apache Spark commented on SPARK-21525:
--------------------------------------

User 'vanzin' has created a pull request for this issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20161

> ReceiverSupervisorImpl seems to ignore the error code when writing to the WAL
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-21525
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21525
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: DStreams
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.0
>            Reporter: Mark Grover
>
> {{AddBlock}} returns an error code related to whether writing the block to the WAL was successful or not. In cases where a WAL may be unavailable temporarily, the write would fail but it seems like we are not using the return code (see [here|https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/ba8912e5f3d5c5a366cb3d1f6be91f2471d048d2/streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/receiver/ReceiverSupervisorImpl.scala#L162]).
> For example, when using the Flume Receiver, we should be sending a n'ack back to Flume if the block wasn't written to the WAL. I haven't gone through the full code path yet but at least from looking at the ReceiverSupervisorImpl, it doesn't seem like that return code is being used.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org