You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by ptomsic <pt...@gmail.com> on 2006/11/10 17:20:30 UTC
performance issues embedding in jboss?
is there specific performance concerns to be aware of if we were to deploy
activemq embedded in jboss as opposed to stand-alone?
thanks
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/performance-issues-embedding-in-jboss--tf2608804.html#a7280122
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Re: performance issues embedding in jboss?
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 11/10/06, ptomsic <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> thanks, what about failover features, i assume those are identical when
> running the broker as embedded?
Yes
>
>
> James.Strachan wrote:
> >
> > Not that I'm aware of, no.
> >
> > On 11/10/06, ptomsic <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> is there specific performance concerns to be aware of if we were to
> >> deploy
> >> activemq embedded in jboss as opposed to stand-alone?
> >>
> >> thanks
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://www.nabble.com/performance-issues-embedding-in-jboss--tf2608804.html#a7280122
> >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > James
> > -------
> > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/performance-issues-embedding-in-jboss--tf2608804.html#a7281945
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: performance issues embedding in jboss?
Posted by ptomsic <pt...@gmail.com>.
thanks, what about failover features, i assume those are identical when
running the broker as embedded?
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> Not that I'm aware of, no.
>
> On 11/10/06, ptomsic <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> is there specific performance concerns to be aware of if we were to
>> deploy
>> activemq embedded in jboss as opposed to stand-alone?
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/performance-issues-embedding-in-jboss--tf2608804.html#a7280122
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/performance-issues-embedding-in-jboss--tf2608804.html#a7281945
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: performance issues embedding in jboss?
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
Not that I'm aware of, no.
On 11/10/06, ptomsic <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> is there specific performance concerns to be aware of if we were to deploy
> activemq embedded in jboss as opposed to stand-alone?
>
> thanks
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/performance-issues-embedding-in-jboss--tf2608804.html#a7280122
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/