You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by "Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/02/21 15:06:15 UTC

[jira] Moved: (SMX4-10) Investigate camel / servicemix integration

     [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SMX4-10?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Guillaume Nodet moved SM-1075 to SMX4-10:
-----------------------------------------

          Project: ServiceMix 4  (was: ServiceMix)
              Key: SMX4-10  (was: SM-1075)
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 4.0)

> Investigate camel / servicemix integration
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SMX4-10
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SMX4-10
>             Project: ServiceMix 4
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
>            Assignee: Santosh R Dubey
>
> Currently camel and servicemix works mainly side by side.  
> The main value added of Camel is the DSL, so I'm wondering if it would be possible / worthwhile to rebuild the camel dsl on top of a stateless asynchronous api like servicemix one.  This would enable a complete integration by not only sharing the exchange model, but also the endpoints and components.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.