You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> on 2005/07/05 03:28:33 UTC
Outstanding webapp issues
Thanks to Bruno for helping me test the webapps after the new build.
Here is a list of outstanding issues that he gave me:
Bruno's List
=========
08:55:25,671 ERROR [PropertyResolverImpl]
org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country
javax.faces.el.PropertyNotFoundException: Bean:
org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country, property: cities
It seems that it is looking for the bean
org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country when it should look for
SimpleCountry.
- sandbox.war: The [SOURCE] link does not work because the source code
servlet system is not present. (I think you already know that one ;-).
- tiles.war: Not working, but I don't know too much about tiles. It is
looking for a missing renderer (UIViewRoot?).
I don't know which is the exact state of the reorg, but it seems to me
that it is almost complete. Have you applied the patch for the
AddResource thing, or have you thought an alternative solution? We
could also ask Sylvain as he could shed more light on this.
And there is also a trivial issue: there is a link to the rssTicker in
the standard examples.
* * *
Also, there are a few other issues that I intentionally skipped over
for now. The WAP example is not being built (nor is the WAP code.)
The dynamic code generation is not being done. We should probably
tweak the build scripts to do this. Ideally, this can be done in a
manner similar to the rest of the build. That is, you can run foo-all
from the top level build dir or foo from the subproject.
If someone wants to help with patches to any of these problems that
would be helpful. Just post to the dev list so we all know which
issues have been addressed. For now I don't think we need JIRA since
we really should be able to finish these off quickly and they are top
priority. If feel they should go in JIRA that is fine also.
sean
Re: Outstanding webapp issues
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
I wasn't really thinking we would realease anytime soon. I certainly
wouldn't recommend next week. There is still a lot of "recovery" from
the reorg to deal with. The only major thing that has changed since
the last release is the reorg (which is not really a meaningful change
to the user.)
At a minimum I would suggest we do the following before releasing:
get the examples working (original topic of this thread)
rework the website
get the tomahawk stuff 100% RI compliant
add back missing stuff (WAP)
sean
ps. I will remember the SVN revisions (see below) in case we need to roll back.
Author: schof
Date: Tue Jul 5 13:59:07 2005
New Revision: 209323
Author: schof
Date: Tue Jul 5 09:28:26 2005
New Revision: 209298
Author: schof
Date: Tue Jul 5 09:28:01 2005
New Revision: 209297
On 7/6/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmm, depends on our release road map. We have not yet dicussed when
> the next official release should happen. What are your feelings about
> the reorg? Do you think we could make a first release candidate next
> week? Or is it too early?
> If we release soon, we should pay much attention to the DataTable
> during release testing. Let's wait for a few days and see if DataTable
> problems stabilize. If not or if we discover major issues during
> release vote we can still rollback. Only thing we have to do is
> remember the timestamp of the patch commit. Sean, can you please stick
> a note to your monitor? :-)
>
> -Manfred
>
>
> 2005/7/6, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
> > Manfred,
> >
> > Its my fault for committing. Mathias just submitted a patch for
> > people to play with. I did a quick test but I thought it would be
> > easier for us to comment on code in SVN instead of trying to keep
> > track of a series of patches.
> >
> > Do you want me to roll it back? I think there have been some good
> > improvements in the implementation. My vote would be to let Mathias
> > continue working on it as long as he has time. We can wait a few days
> > ... If this is a problem though I will roll back and we can let him
> > work offline.
> >
> > sean
> >
> >
> > On 7/6/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Ok, looks like I have to jump into the "bad cop" role now. :-(
> > >
> > > DataTable is a very very delicate component. I know there were some
> > > long outstanding issues, that need to be fixed.
> > > BUT, DataTable supported some important things that only occured in
> > > very complex scenarious. This makes the code look awful and patchy in
> > > some places (escpecially for the nested table stuff), but all those
> > > things were extensively reconsidered and tested, believe me. MyFaces
> > > DataTable solved many issues that RI DataTable had for a long time
> > > (and still has I think).
> > > Please do not get me wrong. I know that the current situation, where
> > > the original author (=me ;-) currently does not have enough time to
> > > dig deep into the implemention, is not desirable. Sorry for that.
> > > Therefore I really appreciate the fantastic work and help of Sean and
> > > Mathias and I try to phrase careful enough to not intimidate someone.
> > > ;-)
> > > So, please be very very careful with the DataTable. Mathias, if you
> > > have really made it to get DataTable easier and clearer, that would
> > > really be great, but please: test, test, test. There will be many
> > > sleeping issues that you might not be aware of by now, believe me. I
> > > remember the hard days (and nights) when I wrote the original
> > > DataTable component.
> > >
> > > No need for panic of course. If you are not able to fix all issues
> > > with features that have worked already (eg. preserveDataTable!) in
> > > reasonable time, we should decide about a rollback scenario. This
> > > would take out the pressure and would give us more time for a more
> > > relaxed discussion.
> > >
> > > Anyway, thanks Mathias for dealing with this "hot iron" and please
> > > keep us up to date.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Manfred
> > >
> > > PS. I would not really be the right cast for a "bad cop", would I? :-)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2005/7/6, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > I have just tried out the simple examples - the dataTable
> > > > implementation seems not to be working anymore.
> > > >
> > > > Now I don't know if this is an issue with the new dataTable
> > > > implementation or with the svn reorg, but we should definitely try to
> > > > fix that.
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > On 7/6/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Two more build issues (easy ones). I write them here as a reminder to
> > > > > create a patch later (if no one creates one before, feel free to do
> > > > > so):
> > > > >
> > > > > - When building only a subproject with 'ant dist', associated files
> > > > > (*.tld's etc) do not make into the jar as the build.properties
> > > > > (situated in the subproject parent folder) is not read.
> > > > > - It is missing the dependency on sandbox.jar in the general
> > > > > dependencies, as if you want to create an example backing bean that
> > > > > use a class from the sandbox, the class is not found. This has
> > > > > happened to me while preparing an example for the Jurgen's schedule
> > > > > component. Easy, just include the dependency. I could have done that
> > > > > in the time of writing this lines...
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Bruno
> > > > >
> > > > > 2005/7/5, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > Thanks to Bruno for helping me test the webapps after the new build.
> > > > > > Here is a list of outstanding issues that he gave me:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bruno's List
> > > > > > =========
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 08:55:25,671 ERROR [PropertyResolverImpl]
> > > > > > org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country
> > > > > > javax.faces.el.PropertyNotFoundException: Bean:
> > > > > > org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country, property: cities
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It seems that it is looking for the bean
> > > > > > org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country when it should look for
> > > > > > SimpleCountry.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - sandbox.war: The [SOURCE] link does not work because the source code
> > > > > > servlet system is not present. (I think you already know that one ;-).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - tiles.war: Not working, but I don't know too much about tiles. It is
> > > > > > looking for a missing renderer (UIViewRoot?).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't know which is the exact state of the reorg, but it seems to me
> > > > > > that it is almost complete. Have you applied the patch for the
> > > > > > AddResource thing, or have you thought an alternative solution? We
> > > > > > could also ask Sylvain as he could shed more light on this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And there is also a trivial issue: there is a link to the rssTicker in
> > > > > > the standard examples.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * * *
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Also, there are a few other issues that I intentionally skipped over
> > > > > > for now. The WAP example is not being built (nor is the WAP code.)
> > > > > > The dynamic code generation is not being done. We should probably
> > > > > > tweak the build scripts to do this. Ideally, this can be done in a
> > > > > > manner similar to the rest of the build. That is, you can run foo-all
> > > > > > from the top level build dir or foo from the subproject.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If someone wants to help with patches to any of these problems that
> > > > > > would be helpful. Just post to the dev list so we all know which
> > > > > > issues have been addressed. For now I don't think we need JIRA since
> > > > > > we really should be able to finish these off quickly and they are top
> > > > > > priority. If feel they should go in JIRA that is fine also.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > sean
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Outstanding webapp issues
Posted by Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>.
Hmm, depends on our release road map. We have not yet dicussed when
the next official release should happen. What are your feelings about
the reorg? Do you think we could make a first release candidate next
week? Or is it too early?
If we release soon, we should pay much attention to the DataTable
during release testing. Let's wait for a few days and see if DataTable
problems stabilize. If not or if we discover major issues during
release vote we can still rollback. Only thing we have to do is
remember the timestamp of the patch commit. Sean, can you please stick
a note to your monitor? :-)
-Manfred
2005/7/6, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
> Manfred,
>
> Its my fault for committing. Mathias just submitted a patch for
> people to play with. I did a quick test but I thought it would be
> easier for us to comment on code in SVN instead of trying to keep
> track of a series of patches.
>
> Do you want me to roll it back? I think there have been some good
> improvements in the implementation. My vote would be to let Mathias
> continue working on it as long as he has time. We can wait a few days
> ... If this is a problem though I will roll back and we can let him
> work offline.
>
> sean
>
>
> On 7/6/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Ok, looks like I have to jump into the "bad cop" role now. :-(
> >
> > DataTable is a very very delicate component. I know there were some
> > long outstanding issues, that need to be fixed.
> > BUT, DataTable supported some important things that only occured in
> > very complex scenarious. This makes the code look awful and patchy in
> > some places (escpecially for the nested table stuff), but all those
> > things were extensively reconsidered and tested, believe me. MyFaces
> > DataTable solved many issues that RI DataTable had for a long time
> > (and still has I think).
> > Please do not get me wrong. I know that the current situation, where
> > the original author (=me ;-) currently does not have enough time to
> > dig deep into the implemention, is not desirable. Sorry for that.
> > Therefore I really appreciate the fantastic work and help of Sean and
> > Mathias and I try to phrase careful enough to not intimidate someone.
> > ;-)
> > So, please be very very careful with the DataTable. Mathias, if you
> > have really made it to get DataTable easier and clearer, that would
> > really be great, but please: test, test, test. There will be many
> > sleeping issues that you might not be aware of by now, believe me. I
> > remember the hard days (and nights) when I wrote the original
> > DataTable component.
> >
> > No need for panic of course. If you are not able to fix all issues
> > with features that have worked already (eg. preserveDataTable!) in
> > reasonable time, we should decide about a rollback scenario. This
> > would take out the pressure and would give us more time for a more
> > relaxed discussion.
> >
> > Anyway, thanks Mathias for dealing with this "hot iron" and please
> > keep us up to date.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Manfred
> >
> > PS. I would not really be the right cast for a "bad cop", would I? :-)
> >
> >
> >
> > 2005/7/6, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > I have just tried out the simple examples - the dataTable
> > > implementation seems not to be working anymore.
> > >
> > > Now I don't know if this is an issue with the new dataTable
> > > implementation or with the svn reorg, but we should definitely try to
> > > fix that.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 7/6/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Two more build issues (easy ones). I write them here as a reminder to
> > > > create a patch later (if no one creates one before, feel free to do
> > > > so):
> > > >
> > > > - When building only a subproject with 'ant dist', associated files
> > > > (*.tld's etc) do not make into the jar as the build.properties
> > > > (situated in the subproject parent folder) is not read.
> > > > - It is missing the dependency on sandbox.jar in the general
> > > > dependencies, as if you want to create an example backing bean that
> > > > use a class from the sandbox, the class is not found. This has
> > > > happened to me while preparing an example for the Jurgen's schedule
> > > > component. Easy, just include the dependency. I could have done that
> > > > in the time of writing this lines...
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Bruno
> > > >
> > > > 2005/7/5, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Thanks to Bruno for helping me test the webapps after the new build.
> > > > > Here is a list of outstanding issues that he gave me:
> > > > >
> > > > > Bruno's List
> > > > > =========
> > > > >
> > > > > 08:55:25,671 ERROR [PropertyResolverImpl]
> > > > > org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country
> > > > > javax.faces.el.PropertyNotFoundException: Bean:
> > > > > org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country, property: cities
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems that it is looking for the bean
> > > > > org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country when it should look for
> > > > > SimpleCountry.
> > > > >
> > > > > - sandbox.war: The [SOURCE] link does not work because the source code
> > > > > servlet system is not present. (I think you already know that one ;-).
> > > > >
> > > > > - tiles.war: Not working, but I don't know too much about tiles. It is
> > > > > looking for a missing renderer (UIViewRoot?).
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't know which is the exact state of the reorg, but it seems to me
> > > > > that it is almost complete. Have you applied the patch for the
> > > > > AddResource thing, or have you thought an alternative solution? We
> > > > > could also ask Sylvain as he could shed more light on this.
> > > > >
> > > > > And there is also a trivial issue: there is a link to the rssTicker in
> > > > > the standard examples.
> > > > >
> > > > > * * *
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, there are a few other issues that I intentionally skipped over
> > > > > for now. The WAP example is not being built (nor is the WAP code.)
> > > > > The dynamic code generation is not being done. We should probably
> > > > > tweak the build scripts to do this. Ideally, this can be done in a
> > > > > manner similar to the rest of the build. That is, you can run foo-all
> > > > > from the top level build dir or foo from the subproject.
> > > > >
> > > > > If someone wants to help with patches to any of these problems that
> > > > > would be helpful. Just post to the dev list so we all know which
> > > > > issues have been addressed. For now I don't think we need JIRA since
> > > > > we really should be able to finish these off quickly and they are top
> > > > > priority. If feel they should go in JIRA that is fine also.
> > > > >
> > > > > sean
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Outstanding webapp issues
Posted by Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>.
Poor Mathias, he is under a lot of pressure. I would let him do for a
while, at least, there are a few other issues that must also be solved
in the meanwhile. It is always time to rollback. I would make the
decision wether to rollback or not when arrives the time to announce
the end of the reorganization. I would keep the patch applied for a
while, because it allows people to test it heavily. Everyone of us use
the dataTable on a different case...
Regards,
Bruno
2005/7/6, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
> Manfred,
>
> Its my fault for committing. Mathias just submitted a patch for
> people to play with. I did a quick test but I thought it would be
> easier for us to comment on code in SVN instead of trying to keep
> track of a series of patches.
>
> Do you want me to roll it back? I think there have been some good
> improvements in the implementation. My vote would be to let Mathias
> continue working on it as long as he has time. We can wait a few days
> ... If this is a problem though I will roll back and we can let him
> work offline.
>
> sean
>
>
> On 7/6/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Ok, looks like I have to jump into the "bad cop" role now. :-(
> >
> > DataTable is a very very delicate component. I know there were some
> > long outstanding issues, that need to be fixed.
> > BUT, DataTable supported some important things that only occured in
> > very complex scenarious. This makes the code look awful and patchy in
> > some places (escpecially for the nested table stuff), but all those
> > things were extensively reconsidered and tested, believe me. MyFaces
> > DataTable solved many issues that RI DataTable had for a long time
> > (and still has I think).
> > Please do not get me wrong. I know that the current situation, where
> > the original author (=me ;-) currently does not have enough time to
> > dig deep into the implemention, is not desirable. Sorry for that.
> > Therefore I really appreciate the fantastic work and help of Sean and
> > Mathias and I try to phrase careful enough to not intimidate someone.
> > ;-)
> > So, please be very very careful with the DataTable. Mathias, if you
> > have really made it to get DataTable easier and clearer, that would
> > really be great, but please: test, test, test. There will be many
> > sleeping issues that you might not be aware of by now, believe me. I
> > remember the hard days (and nights) when I wrote the original
> > DataTable component.
> >
> > No need for panic of course. If you are not able to fix all issues
> > with features that have worked already (eg. preserveDataTable!) in
> > reasonable time, we should decide about a rollback scenario. This
> > would take out the pressure and would give us more time for a more
> > relaxed discussion.
> >
> > Anyway, thanks Mathias for dealing with this "hot iron" and please
> > keep us up to date.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Manfred
> >
> > PS. I would not really be the right cast for a "bad cop", would I? :-)
> >
> >
> >
> > 2005/7/6, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > I have just tried out the simple examples - the dataTable
> > > implementation seems not to be working anymore.
> > >
> > > Now I don't know if this is an issue with the new dataTable
> > > implementation or with the svn reorg, but we should definitely try to
> > > fix that.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 7/6/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Two more build issues (easy ones). I write them here as a reminder to
> > > > create a patch later (if no one creates one before, feel free to do
> > > > so):
> > > >
> > > > - When building only a subproject with 'ant dist', associated files
> > > > (*.tld's etc) do not make into the jar as the build.properties
> > > > (situated in the subproject parent folder) is not read.
> > > > - It is missing the dependency on sandbox.jar in the general
> > > > dependencies, as if you want to create an example backing bean that
> > > > use a class from the sandbox, the class is not found. This has
> > > > happened to me while preparing an example for the Jurgen's schedule
> > > > component. Easy, just include the dependency. I could have done that
> > > > in the time of writing this lines...
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Bruno
> > > >
> > > > 2005/7/5, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Thanks to Bruno for helping me test the webapps after the new build.
> > > > > Here is a list of outstanding issues that he gave me:
> > > > >
> > > > > Bruno's List
> > > > > =========
> > > > >
> > > > > 08:55:25,671 ERROR [PropertyResolverImpl]
> > > > > org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country
> > > > > javax.faces.el.PropertyNotFoundException: Bean:
> > > > > org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country, property: cities
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems that it is looking for the bean
> > > > > org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country when it should look for
> > > > > SimpleCountry.
> > > > >
> > > > > - sandbox.war: The [SOURCE] link does not work because the source code
> > > > > servlet system is not present. (I think you already know that one ;-).
> > > > >
> > > > > - tiles.war: Not working, but I don't know too much about tiles. It is
> > > > > looking for a missing renderer (UIViewRoot?).
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't know which is the exact state of the reorg, but it seems to me
> > > > > that it is almost complete. Have you applied the patch for the
> > > > > AddResource thing, or have you thought an alternative solution? We
> > > > > could also ask Sylvain as he could shed more light on this.
> > > > >
> > > > > And there is also a trivial issue: there is a link to the rssTicker in
> > > > > the standard examples.
> > > > >
> > > > > * * *
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, there are a few other issues that I intentionally skipped over
> > > > > for now. The WAP example is not being built (nor is the WAP code.)
> > > > > The dynamic code generation is not being done. We should probably
> > > > > tweak the build scripts to do this. Ideally, this can be done in a
> > > > > manner similar to the rest of the build. That is, you can run foo-all
> > > > > from the top level build dir or foo from the subproject.
> > > > >
> > > > > If someone wants to help with patches to any of these problems that
> > > > > would be helpful. Just post to the dev list so we all know which
> > > > > issues have been addressed. For now I don't think we need JIRA since
> > > > > we really should be able to finish these off quickly and they are top
> > > > > priority. If feel they should go in JIRA that is fine also.
> > > > >
> > > > > sean
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Outstanding webapp issues
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
Manfred,
Its my fault for committing. Mathias just submitted a patch for
people to play with. I did a quick test but I thought it would be
easier for us to comment on code in SVN instead of trying to keep
track of a series of patches.
Do you want me to roll it back? I think there have been some good
improvements in the implementation. My vote would be to let Mathias
continue working on it as long as he has time. We can wait a few days
... If this is a problem though I will roll back and we can let him
work offline.
sean
On 7/6/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, looks like I have to jump into the "bad cop" role now. :-(
>
> DataTable is a very very delicate component. I know there were some
> long outstanding issues, that need to be fixed.
> BUT, DataTable supported some important things that only occured in
> very complex scenarious. This makes the code look awful and patchy in
> some places (escpecially for the nested table stuff), but all those
> things were extensively reconsidered and tested, believe me. MyFaces
> DataTable solved many issues that RI DataTable had for a long time
> (and still has I think).
> Please do not get me wrong. I know that the current situation, where
> the original author (=me ;-) currently does not have enough time to
> dig deep into the implemention, is not desirable. Sorry for that.
> Therefore I really appreciate the fantastic work and help of Sean and
> Mathias and I try to phrase careful enough to not intimidate someone.
> ;-)
> So, please be very very careful with the DataTable. Mathias, if you
> have really made it to get DataTable easier and clearer, that would
> really be great, but please: test, test, test. There will be many
> sleeping issues that you might not be aware of by now, believe me. I
> remember the hard days (and nights) when I wrote the original
> DataTable component.
>
> No need for panic of course. If you are not able to fix all issues
> with features that have worked already (eg. preserveDataTable!) in
> reasonable time, we should decide about a rollback scenario. This
> would take out the pressure and would give us more time for a more
> relaxed discussion.
>
> Anyway, thanks Mathias for dealing with this "hot iron" and please
> keep us up to date.
>
> Thanks,
> -Manfred
>
> PS. I would not really be the right cast for a "bad cop", would I? :-)
>
>
>
> 2005/7/6, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > I have just tried out the simple examples - the dataTable
> > implementation seems not to be working anymore.
> >
> > Now I don't know if this is an issue with the new dataTable
> > implementation or with the svn reorg, but we should definitely try to
> > fix that.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 7/6/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Two more build issues (easy ones). I write them here as a reminder to
> > > create a patch later (if no one creates one before, feel free to do
> > > so):
> > >
> > > - When building only a subproject with 'ant dist', associated files
> > > (*.tld's etc) do not make into the jar as the build.properties
> > > (situated in the subproject parent folder) is not read.
> > > - It is missing the dependency on sandbox.jar in the general
> > > dependencies, as if you want to create an example backing bean that
> > > use a class from the sandbox, the class is not found. This has
> > > happened to me while preparing an example for the Jurgen's schedule
> > > component. Easy, just include the dependency. I could have done that
> > > in the time of writing this lines...
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Bruno
> > >
> > > 2005/7/5, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
> > > > Thanks to Bruno for helping me test the webapps after the new build.
> > > > Here is a list of outstanding issues that he gave me:
> > > >
> > > > Bruno's List
> > > > =========
> > > >
> > > > 08:55:25,671 ERROR [PropertyResolverImpl]
> > > > org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country
> > > > javax.faces.el.PropertyNotFoundException: Bean:
> > > > org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country, property: cities
> > > >
> > > > It seems that it is looking for the bean
> > > > org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country when it should look for
> > > > SimpleCountry.
> > > >
> > > > - sandbox.war: The [SOURCE] link does not work because the source code
> > > > servlet system is not present. (I think you already know that one ;-).
> > > >
> > > > - tiles.war: Not working, but I don't know too much about tiles. It is
> > > > looking for a missing renderer (UIViewRoot?).
> > > >
> > > > I don't know which is the exact state of the reorg, but it seems to me
> > > > that it is almost complete. Have you applied the patch for the
> > > > AddResource thing, or have you thought an alternative solution? We
> > > > could also ask Sylvain as he could shed more light on this.
> > > >
> > > > And there is also a trivial issue: there is a link to the rssTicker in
> > > > the standard examples.
> > > >
> > > > * * *
> > > >
> > > > Also, there are a few other issues that I intentionally skipped over
> > > > for now. The WAP example is not being built (nor is the WAP code.)
> > > > The dynamic code generation is not being done. We should probably
> > > > tweak the build scripts to do this. Ideally, this can be done in a
> > > > manner similar to the rest of the build. That is, you can run foo-all
> > > > from the top level build dir or foo from the subproject.
> > > >
> > > > If someone wants to help with patches to any of these problems that
> > > > would be helpful. Just post to the dev list so we all know which
> > > > issues have been addressed. For now I don't think we need JIRA since
> > > > we really should be able to finish these off quickly and they are top
> > > > priority. If feel they should go in JIRA that is fine also.
> > > >
> > > > sean
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Outstanding webapp issues
Posted by Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>.
Ok, looks like I have to jump into the "bad cop" role now. :-(
DataTable is a very very delicate component. I know there were some
long outstanding issues, that need to be fixed.
BUT, DataTable supported some important things that only occured in
very complex scenarious. This makes the code look awful and patchy in
some places (escpecially for the nested table stuff), but all those
things were extensively reconsidered and tested, believe me. MyFaces
DataTable solved many issues that RI DataTable had for a long time
(and still has I think).
Please do not get me wrong. I know that the current situation, where
the original author (=me ;-) currently does not have enough time to
dig deep into the implemention, is not desirable. Sorry for that.
Therefore I really appreciate the fantastic work and help of Sean and
Mathias and I try to phrase careful enough to not intimidate someone.
;-)
So, please be very very careful with the DataTable. Mathias, if you
have really made it to get DataTable easier and clearer, that would
really be great, but please: test, test, test. There will be many
sleeping issues that you might not be aware of by now, believe me. I
remember the hard days (and nights) when I wrote the original
DataTable component.
No need for panic of course. If you are not able to fix all issues
with features that have worked already (eg. preserveDataTable!) in
reasonable time, we should decide about a rollback scenario. This
would take out the pressure and would give us more time for a more
relaxed discussion.
Anyway, thanks Mathias for dealing with this "hot iron" and please
keep us up to date.
Thanks,
-Manfred
PS. I would not really be the right cast for a "bad cop", would I? :-)
2005/7/6, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> I have just tried out the simple examples - the dataTable
> implementation seems not to be working anymore.
>
> Now I don't know if this is an issue with the new dataTable
> implementation or with the svn reorg, but we should definitely try to
> fix that.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 7/6/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Two more build issues (easy ones). I write them here as a reminder to
> > create a patch later (if no one creates one before, feel free to do
> > so):
> >
> > - When building only a subproject with 'ant dist', associated files
> > (*.tld's etc) do not make into the jar as the build.properties
> > (situated in the subproject parent folder) is not read.
> > - It is missing the dependency on sandbox.jar in the general
> > dependencies, as if you want to create an example backing bean that
> > use a class from the sandbox, the class is not found. This has
> > happened to me while preparing an example for the Jurgen's schedule
> > component. Easy, just include the dependency. I could have done that
> > in the time of writing this lines...
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Bruno
> >
> > 2005/7/5, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
> > > Thanks to Bruno for helping me test the webapps after the new build.
> > > Here is a list of outstanding issues that he gave me:
> > >
> > > Bruno's List
> > > =========
> > >
> > > 08:55:25,671 ERROR [PropertyResolverImpl]
> > > org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country
> > > javax.faces.el.PropertyNotFoundException: Bean:
> > > org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country, property: cities
> > >
> > > It seems that it is looking for the bean
> > > org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country when it should look for
> > > SimpleCountry.
> > >
> > > - sandbox.war: The [SOURCE] link does not work because the source code
> > > servlet system is not present. (I think you already know that one ;-).
> > >
> > > - tiles.war: Not working, but I don't know too much about tiles. It is
> > > looking for a missing renderer (UIViewRoot?).
> > >
> > > I don't know which is the exact state of the reorg, but it seems to me
> > > that it is almost complete. Have you applied the patch for the
> > > AddResource thing, or have you thought an alternative solution? We
> > > could also ask Sylvain as he could shed more light on this.
> > >
> > > And there is also a trivial issue: there is a link to the rssTicker in
> > > the standard examples.
> > >
> > > * * *
> > >
> > > Also, there are a few other issues that I intentionally skipped over
> > > for now. The WAP example is not being built (nor is the WAP code.)
> > > The dynamic code generation is not being done. We should probably
> > > tweak the build scripts to do this. Ideally, this can be done in a
> > > manner similar to the rest of the build. That is, you can run foo-all
> > > from the top level build dir or foo from the subproject.
> > >
> > > If someone wants to help with patches to any of these problems that
> > > would be helpful. Just post to the dev list so we all know which
> > > issues have been addressed. For now I don't think we need JIRA since
> > > we really should be able to finish these off quickly and they are top
> > > priority. If feel they should go in JIRA that is fine also.
> > >
> > > sean
> > >
> >
>
Re: Outstanding webapp issues
Posted by Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>.
I should be from the new dataTable implementation, because at the time
of writing the first mail I tested *all* the examples, looking for
destruction ;-) Almost everything worked at that time...
Regards
Bruno
2005/7/6, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> I have just tried out the simple examples - the dataTable
> implementation seems not to be working anymore.
>
> Now I don't know if this is an issue with the new dataTable
> implementation or with the svn reorg, but we should definitely try to
> fix that.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 7/6/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Two more build issues (easy ones). I write them here as a reminder to
> > create a patch later (if no one creates one before, feel free to do
> > so):
> >
> > - When building only a subproject with 'ant dist', associated files
> > (*.tld's etc) do not make into the jar as the build.properties
> > (situated in the subproject parent folder) is not read.
> > - It is missing the dependency on sandbox.jar in the general
> > dependencies, as if you want to create an example backing bean that
> > use a class from the sandbox, the class is not found. This has
> > happened to me while preparing an example for the Jurgen's schedule
> > component. Easy, just include the dependency. I could have done that
> > in the time of writing this lines...
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Bruno
> >
> > 2005/7/5, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
> > > Thanks to Bruno for helping me test the webapps after the new build.
> > > Here is a list of outstanding issues that he gave me:
> > >
> > > Bruno's List
> > > =========
> > >
> > > 08:55:25,671 ERROR [PropertyResolverImpl]
> > > org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country
> > > javax.faces.el.PropertyNotFoundException: Bean:
> > > org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country, property: cities
> > >
> > > It seems that it is looking for the bean
> > > org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country when it should look for
> > > SimpleCountry.
> > >
> > > - sandbox.war: The [SOURCE] link does not work because the source code
> > > servlet system is not present. (I think you already know that one ;-).
> > >
> > > - tiles.war: Not working, but I don't know too much about tiles. It is
> > > looking for a missing renderer (UIViewRoot?).
> > >
> > > I don't know which is the exact state of the reorg, but it seems to me
> > > that it is almost complete. Have you applied the patch for the
> > > AddResource thing, or have you thought an alternative solution? We
> > > could also ask Sylvain as he could shed more light on this.
> > >
> > > And there is also a trivial issue: there is a link to the rssTicker in
> > > the standard examples.
> > >
> > > * * *
> > >
> > > Also, there are a few other issues that I intentionally skipped over
> > > for now. The WAP example is not being built (nor is the WAP code.)
> > > The dynamic code generation is not being done. We should probably
> > > tweak the build scripts to do this. Ideally, this can be done in a
> > > manner similar to the rest of the build. That is, you can run foo-all
> > > from the top level build dir or foo from the subproject.
> > >
> > > If someone wants to help with patches to any of these problems that
> > > would be helpful. Just post to the dev list so we all know which
> > > issues have been addressed. For now I don't think we need JIRA since
> > > we really should be able to finish these off quickly and they are top
> > > priority. If feel they should go in JIRA that is fine also.
> > >
> > > sean
> > >
> >
>
Re: Outstanding webapp issues
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
I have just tried out the simple examples - the dataTable
implementation seems not to be working anymore.
Now I don't know if this is an issue with the new dataTable
implementation or with the svn reorg, but we should definitely try to
fix that.
regards,
Martin
On 7/6/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Two more build issues (easy ones). I write them here as a reminder to
> create a patch later (if no one creates one before, feel free to do
> so):
>
> - When building only a subproject with 'ant dist', associated files
> (*.tld's etc) do not make into the jar as the build.properties
> (situated in the subproject parent folder) is not read.
> - It is missing the dependency on sandbox.jar in the general
> dependencies, as if you want to create an example backing bean that
> use a class from the sandbox, the class is not found. This has
> happened to me while preparing an example for the Jurgen's schedule
> component. Easy, just include the dependency. I could have done that
> in the time of writing this lines...
>
> Regards,
>
> Bruno
>
> 2005/7/5, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
> > Thanks to Bruno for helping me test the webapps after the new build.
> > Here is a list of outstanding issues that he gave me:
> >
> > Bruno's List
> > =========
> >
> > 08:55:25,671 ERROR [PropertyResolverImpl]
> > org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country
> > javax.faces.el.PropertyNotFoundException: Bean:
> > org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country, property: cities
> >
> > It seems that it is looking for the bean
> > org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country when it should look for
> > SimpleCountry.
> >
> > - sandbox.war: The [SOURCE] link does not work because the source code
> > servlet system is not present. (I think you already know that one ;-).
> >
> > - tiles.war: Not working, but I don't know too much about tiles. It is
> > looking for a missing renderer (UIViewRoot?).
> >
> > I don't know which is the exact state of the reorg, but it seems to me
> > that it is almost complete. Have you applied the patch for the
> > AddResource thing, or have you thought an alternative solution? We
> > could also ask Sylvain as he could shed more light on this.
> >
> > And there is also a trivial issue: there is a link to the rssTicker in
> > the standard examples.
> >
> > * * *
> >
> > Also, there are a few other issues that I intentionally skipped over
> > for now. The WAP example is not being built (nor is the WAP code.)
> > The dynamic code generation is not being done. We should probably
> > tweak the build scripts to do this. Ideally, this can be done in a
> > manner similar to the rest of the build. That is, you can run foo-all
> > from the top level build dir or foo from the subproject.
> >
> > If someone wants to help with patches to any of these problems that
> > would be helpful. Just post to the dev list so we all know which
> > issues have been addressed. For now I don't think we need JIRA since
> > we really should be able to finish these off quickly and they are top
> > priority. If feel they should go in JIRA that is fine also.
> >
> > sean
> >
>
Re: Outstanding webapp issues
Posted by Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>.
Two more build issues (easy ones). I write them here as a reminder to
create a patch later (if no one creates one before, feel free to do
so):
- When building only a subproject with 'ant dist', associated files
(*.tld's etc) do not make into the jar as the build.properties
(situated in the subproject parent folder) is not read.
- It is missing the dependency on sandbox.jar in the general
dependencies, as if you want to create an example backing bean that
use a class from the sandbox, the class is not found. This has
happened to me while preparing an example for the Jurgen's schedule
component. Easy, just include the dependency. I could have done that
in the time of writing this lines...
Regards,
Bruno
2005/7/5, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
> Thanks to Bruno for helping me test the webapps after the new build.
> Here is a list of outstanding issues that he gave me:
>
> Bruno's List
> =========
>
> 08:55:25,671 ERROR [PropertyResolverImpl]
> org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country
> javax.faces.el.PropertyNotFoundException: Bean:
> org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country, property: cities
>
> It seems that it is looking for the bean
> org.apache.myfaces.examples.misc.Country when it should look for
> SimpleCountry.
>
> - sandbox.war: The [SOURCE] link does not work because the source code
> servlet system is not present. (I think you already know that one ;-).
>
> - tiles.war: Not working, but I don't know too much about tiles. It is
> looking for a missing renderer (UIViewRoot?).
>
> I don't know which is the exact state of the reorg, but it seems to me
> that it is almost complete. Have you applied the patch for the
> AddResource thing, or have you thought an alternative solution? We
> could also ask Sylvain as he could shed more light on this.
>
> And there is also a trivial issue: there is a link to the rssTicker in
> the standard examples.
>
> * * *
>
> Also, there are a few other issues that I intentionally skipped over
> for now. The WAP example is not being built (nor is the WAP code.)
> The dynamic code generation is not being done. We should probably
> tweak the build scripts to do this. Ideally, this can be done in a
> manner similar to the rest of the build. That is, you can run foo-all
> from the top level build dir or foo from the subproject.
>
> If someone wants to help with patches to any of these problems that
> would be helpful. Just post to the dev list so we all know which
> issues have been addressed. For now I don't think we need JIRA since
> we really should be able to finish these off quickly and they are top
> priority. If feel they should go in JIRA that is fine also.
>
> sean
>