You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tiles.apache.org by Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com> on 2008/05/17 15:40:08 UTC
[VOTE] 2.0.6 Release Quality
The Tiles 2.0.6 test build has been available since 15th May 2008.
Release notes:
* https://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10160&styleName=Html&version=21862
Distribution:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.6/
Maven 2 staging repository:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.6/m2-staging-repository/
If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with
a vote on its quality:
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
Re: [VOTE] 2.0.6 Release Quality
Posted by Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>.
I'm going to try to take a closer look at the distro today, but if I
don't get to it today I will get to it in the next couple days.
Thanks,
Greg
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Antonio Petrelli
<an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2008/5/17 Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>:
>> [X] General Availability (GA)
>
> +1 to GA.
>
> Antonio
>
Re: [VOTE] 2.0.6 Release Quality
Posted by Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>.
2008/5/17 Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>:
> [X] General Availability (GA)
+1 to GA.
Antonio
Re: [VOTE] 2.0.6 Release Quality
Posted by Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>.
2008/5/25 Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>:
> I am going to publish Tiles 2.0.6 ASAP.
I have a problem with the Maven Stage plugin, so I will try tomorrow.
Ciao
Antonio
Re: [VOTE] 2.0.6 Release Quality
Posted by Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>.
So, since 72 hours have passed and three PMC members voted, I collect
the results:
+1 GA: me, Greg, Nathan.
I am going to publish Tiles 2.0.6 ASAP.
Thanks!
Antonio
Re: [VOTE] 2.0.6 Release Quality
Posted by Nathan Bubna <nb...@gmail.com>.
er... that is +1 for GA, just to be clear.
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Nathan Bubna <nb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 looks great!
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Nathan Bubna <nb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Been out of town, catching up on stuff... will try today or tomorrow,
>> but sadly can't promise anything...
>>
>> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Antonio Petrelli
>> <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 2008/5/23 Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>:
>>>> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Antonio Petrelli
>>>> <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with
>>>>> a vote on its quality:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] Leave at test build
>>>>> [ ] Alpha
>>>>> [ ] Beta
>>>>> [X] General Availability (GA)
>>>>
>>>> Finally got around to looking at this. Sorry for the delay.
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot Greg, but I need at least one more vote from a PMC member
>>> to finish the release.
>>>
>>> Antonio
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] 2.0.6 Release Quality
Posted by Nathan Bubna <nb...@gmail.com>.
+1 looks great!
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Nathan Bubna <nb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Been out of town, catching up on stuff... will try today or tomorrow,
> but sadly can't promise anything...
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Antonio Petrelli
> <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2008/5/23 Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>:
>>> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Antonio Petrelli
>>> <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with
>>>> a vote on its quality:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] Leave at test build
>>>> [ ] Alpha
>>>> [ ] Beta
>>>> [X] General Availability (GA)
>>>
>>> Finally got around to looking at this. Sorry for the delay.
>>
>> Thanks a lot Greg, but I need at least one more vote from a PMC member
>> to finish the release.
>>
>> Antonio
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] 2.0.6 Release Quality
Posted by Nathan Bubna <nb...@gmail.com>.
Been out of town, catching up on stuff... will try today or tomorrow,
but sadly can't promise anything...
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Antonio Petrelli
<an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2008/5/23 Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>:
>> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Antonio Petrelli
>> <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with
>>> a vote on its quality:
>>>
>>> [ ] Leave at test build
>>> [ ] Alpha
>>> [ ] Beta
>>> [X] General Availability (GA)
>>
>> Finally got around to looking at this. Sorry for the delay.
>
> Thanks a lot Greg, but I need at least one more vote from a PMC member
> to finish the release.
>
> Antonio
>
Re: [VOTE] 2.0.6 Release Quality
Posted by Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>.
2008/5/23 Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Antonio Petrelli
> <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with
>> a vote on its quality:
>>
>> [ ] Leave at test build
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [ ] Beta
>> [X] General Availability (GA)
>
> Finally got around to looking at this. Sorry for the delay.
Thanks a lot Greg, but I need at least one more vote from a PMC member
to finish the release.
Antonio
Re: [VOTE] 2.0.6 Release Quality
Posted by Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Antonio Petrelli
<an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with
> a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X] General Availability (GA)
Finally got around to looking at this. Sorry for the delay.
Greg