You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Chetan Mehrotra (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/05/05 08:59:12 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-4300) Cost per entry for Lucene index of type v1 should be higher than that of v2

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Chetan Mehrotra resolved OAK-4300.
----------------------------------
       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 1.6

Change the default cost per entry for compatVersion 1.0 to 1.5. While for others it is 1.0

* trunk - [1742376|http://svn.apache.org/r1742376]

> Cost per entry for Lucene index of type v1 should be higher than that of v2
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-4300
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4300
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: lucene
>            Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra
>            Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.6, 1.5.2
>
>
> Currently default cost per entry for Lucene index of type
> # v1 - which uses query time aggregation
> # v2 - which uses index time aggregation
> Are same. However given that query time aggregation would require more effort it should result in a higher cost per entry.
> This fact impacts the result in cases like OAK-2081 (see last few comments) where with usage of limits both index are currently considered equals



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)