Xml-commons logo

[Nicola Ken Barozzi <ni...@apache.org>]

Attached is the xml-commons logo after the latest suggestions of some 
time back. would it be ok?

-- 
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   nicolaken@apache.org
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: Xml-commons logo

[Martin Stricker <sh...@gmx.de>]

Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> 
> Attached is the xml-commons logo after the latest suggestions of some
> time back. would it be ok?

+1 (non-committer)
I like it!

Best regards,
Martin Stricker
-- 
Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/
Linux Migration Project: http://www.linux-migration.org/
Red Hat Linux 7.3 for low memory: http://www.rule-project.org/
Registered Linux user #210635: http://counter.li.org/

Re: Xml-commons logo

[David Crossley <cr...@indexgeo.com.au>]

Many thanks to Nicola Ken for the brilliant logo.
I chose the middle one and twiddled it to be less high.
Beauty.

--David

----------------------
Subject: Re: draft website for xml-commons using Forrest

For the possible logos:
http://www.apache.org/~nicolaken/whiteboard/logos/xml-commons.html
----------------------

Re: Xml-commons logo

[Nicola Ken Barozzi <ni...@apache.org>]

David Crossley wrote, On 08/02/2003 6.30:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> 
>>Attached is the xml-commons logo after the latest suggestions of some 
>>time back. would it be ok?
> 
> 
> In the previous discussion, we said that we did not
> like the idea of an empty <xml-commons/> element.
 >
> You had another example where the <xml-commons>
> element was a container for the pipe - i really
> liked the symbolism of that. Gathering on the commons.

Ah, sorry, I just remembered

 >>Is there room to squeeze in an outer <apache> element?

and forgot of the rest, my bad.

The fact is that It becomes really big, so I put the tag on the logo to 
make it part of it... I've put here [1] other two versions, see if they 
are better.

<slightly-embarrassed>
   Sorry again, I did not mean to ditch the previous decisions.
</slightly-embarrassed>

[1] http://cvs.apache.org/~nicolaken/xml-commons.html

-- 
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   nicolaken@apache.org
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: Xml-commons logo

[David Crossley <cr...@indexgeo.com.au>]

Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> 
> Attached is the xml-commons logo after the latest suggestions of some 
> time back. would it be ok?

In the previous discussion, we said that we did not
like the idea of an empty <xml-commons/> element.
You had another example where the <xml-commons>
element was a container for the pipe - i really
liked the symbolism of that. Gathering on the commons.

Anyway, whatever you come up with is fine. Thanks.
--David

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-commons-dev&m=103735310723382
NKB wrote:
> DC wrote:
> > NKB wrote:
> > Have a look here about current draft tests:
> > http://cvs.apache.org/~nicolaken/testlogos.html
> >
> > Apache Commons too is in the quest for a logo.
> >
> > Comments and alternative proposals very welcome.
>
> Excellent work Ken. I like the first one. Open Commons
> containing and providing Peace. (The other ones with the
> empty element <commons/> do not convey the same meaning.)
> Good, I'm happy the graphical message went through so easily :-)
> Is there room to squeeze in an outer <apache> element?

Cool, nice idea I'll work on it :-)