You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Matthias (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/10/26 10:23:00 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (FLINK-12674)
BoundedBlockingSubpartition#unsynchronizedGetNumberOfQueuedBuffers is not
implemented
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17219596#comment-17219596 ]
Matthias edited comment on FLINK-12674 at 10/26/20, 10:22 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
[~pnowojski] does this bug still need to be fixed or is it obsolete?
was (Author: mapohl):
[~pnowojski] does this bug still needs to be fixed or is it obsolete?
> BoundedBlockingSubpartition#unsynchronizedGetNumberOfQueuedBuffers is not implemented
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-12674
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12674
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Runtime / Metrics, Runtime / Network
> Affects Versions: 1.9.0
> Reporter: Piotr Nowojski
> Priority: Major
>
> Currently {{BoundedBlockingSubpartition#unsynchronizedGetNumberOfQueuedBuffers}} returns always 0, which affects metrics and is a regression compared to the old {{SpillableSubpartition}}. Is there a way to implement it?
>
> Note that before taking this ticket, make sure what's the current status of the issue reported https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12070?focusedCommentId=16849615&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16849615 which might affect the final implementation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)