You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@thrift.apache.org by "Anatol Pomozov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/01/18 21:46:07 UTC
[jira] Commented: (THRIFT-797) Converting to cmake from autotools
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12983368#action_12983368 ]
Anatol Pomozov commented on THRIFT-797:
---------------------------------------
What are the benefits of CMake?
If you are looking for better build system I would recommend Tup then. http://gittup.org/tup/make_vs_tup.html
> Converting to cmake from autotools
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: THRIFT-797
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-797
> Project: Thrift
> Issue Type: Test
> Components: Build Process
> Environment: cmake
> Reporter: Pierre-Alexandre St-Jean
> Attachments: 0001-Make-thrift-compiler-and-cpp-part-compile-with-cmake.patch
>
>
> Replace automake by cmake
> This patch only has parts done ie: the compiler and cpp compiler part.
> This would affect all the project and is only a test. The advantages of cmake is that is is available easily on all platforms and generates makefiles for lots of systems. The only disavantage is that cmake would be a requirement even for non developers would want to build thrift. Also thrift would ease for the port on windows.
> Alternatives would be scons and waf. I am currently doing a test with waf build system too (advantage of waf is that it is standalone and can be packaged with the app)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.