You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@aries.apache.org by Holly Cummins <ho...@googlemail.com> on 2012/08/29 08:01:49 UTC
ARIES-899
Guillaume,
It looks like the latest changes for ARIES-899 have caused several
test failures. They don't show up in trunk, where we test with
released versions, but if you look at the
AriesWithSnapshotDependencies build you can see several tests which
exercise the interaction of other modules with the latest Blueprint
code have started failing since the 899 commit. Do you think you could
investigate?
(You may need to change poms to reproduce locally, but please don't
commit those pom changes, like I did by accident when I investigated a
snapshots test failure. I know it's a pain, so I'm still working on
our maven goal to transparently test with snapshots.)
Holly
Re: ARIES-899
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Do you have a pointer to the AriesWithSnapshotDependencies ?
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012, Holly Cummins wrote:
> Guillaume,
>
> It looks like the latest changes for ARIES-899 have caused several test
> failures. They don't show up in trunk, where we test with released
> versions, but if you look at the AriesWithSnapshotDependencies build you
> can see several tests which exercise the interaction of other modules with
> the latest Blueprint code have started failing since the 899 commit. Do you
> think you could investigate?
>
> (You may need to change poms to reproduce locally, but please don't commit
> those pom changes, like I did by accident when I investigated a snapshots
> test failure. I know it's a pain, so I'm still working on our maven goal to
> transparently test with snapshots.)
>
> Holly
>
--
------------------------
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
FuseSource, Integration everywhere
http://fusesource.com
Re: ARIES-899
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
The issues seem to be fixed now.
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012, Holly Cummins wrote:
> A link was mailed to the dev list. See <https://builds.apache.org/**job/**
> AriesWithSnapshotDependencies/**212/<https://builds.apache.org/job/AriesWithSnapshotDependencies/212/>
> .
> (Could your spam filter be excluding it?)
>
> I reran the the build to confirm the failures were reproducible, and they
> do seem to be. There are five transaction failures, the JNDI test blueprint
> comp namespace works test, and one of the blog tests.
>
> On 29 Aug 2012, at 07:15, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Do you have a pointer to the AriesWithSnapshotDependencies test ?
>>
>> On Wednesday, August 29, 2012, Holly Cummins wrote:
>>
>> Guillaume,
>>>
>>> It looks like the latest changes for ARIES-899 have caused several test
>>> failures. They don't show up in trunk, where we test with released
>>> versions, but if you look at the AriesWithSnapshotDependencies build you
>>> can see several tests which exercise the interaction of other modules
>>> with
>>> the latest Blueprint code have started failing since the 899 commit. Do
>>> you
>>> think you could investigate?
>>>
>>> (You may need to change poms to reproduce locally, but please don't
>>> commit
>>> those pom changes, like I did by accident when I investigated a snapshots
>>> test failure. I know it's a pain, so I'm still working on our maven goal
>>> to
>>> transparently test with snapshots.)
>>>
>>> Holly
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> ------------------------
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> FuseSource, Integration everywhere
>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>
--
------------------------
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
FuseSource, Integration everywhere
http://fusesource.com
Re: ARIES-899
Posted by Holly Cummins <ho...@googlemail.com>.
A link was mailed to the dev list. See <https://builds.apache.org/job/AriesWithSnapshotDependencies/212/
.
(Could your spam filter be excluding it?)
I reran the the build to confirm the failures were reproducible, and
they do seem to be. There are five transaction failures, the JNDI test
blueprint comp namespace works test, and one of the blog tests.
On 29 Aug 2012, at 07:15, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do you have a pointer to the AriesWithSnapshotDependencies test ?
>
> On Wednesday, August 29, 2012, Holly Cummins wrote:
>
>> Guillaume,
>>
>> It looks like the latest changes for ARIES-899 have caused several
>> test
>> failures. They don't show up in trunk, where we test with released
>> versions, but if you look at the AriesWithSnapshotDependencies
>> build you
>> can see several tests which exercise the interaction of other
>> modules with
>> the latest Blueprint code have started failing since the 899
>> commit. Do you
>> think you could investigate?
>>
>> (You may need to change poms to reproduce locally, but please don't
>> commit
>> those pom changes, like I did by accident when I investigated a
>> snapshots
>> test failure. I know it's a pain, so I'm still working on our maven
>> goal to
>> transparently test with snapshots.)
>>
>> Holly
>>
>
>
> --
> ------------------------
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> FuseSource, Integration everywhere
> http://fusesource.com
Re: ARIES-899
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Do you have a pointer to the AriesWithSnapshotDependencies test ?
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012, Holly Cummins wrote:
> Guillaume,
>
> It looks like the latest changes for ARIES-899 have caused several test
> failures. They don't show up in trunk, where we test with released
> versions, but if you look at the AriesWithSnapshotDependencies build you
> can see several tests which exercise the interaction of other modules with
> the latest Blueprint code have started failing since the 899 commit. Do you
> think you could investigate?
>
> (You may need to change poms to reproduce locally, but please don't commit
> those pom changes, like I did by accident when I investigated a snapshots
> test failure. I know it's a pain, so I'm still working on our maven goal to
> transparently test with snapshots.)
>
> Holly
>
--
------------------------
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
FuseSource, Integration everywhere
http://fusesource.com