You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@couchdb.apache.org by Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com> on 2011/01/20 16:06:52 UTC
[VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
This is the third release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.0.2
Changes since the last round:
* Fix raw view document link due to overlealous URI encoding in
Futon.
* Spell javascript correctly in loadScript(uri).
* Preserve purge metadata during compaction to avoid spurious
view regeneration.
* Fix spurious conflicts during attachment uploads after a document
has had a conflict. See COUCHDB-902 for details.
* Fix multipart GET APIs to always send attachments in compressed
form when they are compressed on disk. This fixes a bug for
attachments created via local-local replication. See COUCHDB-1022
for details.
We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release
is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release. Please report your
results and vote to this thread.
We are voting on the following release artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/
These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.2 tag in Subversion:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.2/
Happy voting!
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Jeff Zellner <je...@gmail.com>.
+1
everything passing on Ubuntu 10.10, Erlang 14B01
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>wrote:
> This is the third release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.0.2
>
> Changes since the last round:
>
> * Fix raw view document link due to overlealous URI encoding in
> Futon.
> * Spell javascript correctly in loadScript(uri).
> * Preserve purge metadata during compaction to avoid spurious
> view regeneration.
> * Fix spurious conflicts during attachment uploads after a document
> has had a conflict. See COUCHDB-902 for details.
> * Fix multipart GET APIs to always send attachments in compressed
> form when they are compressed on disk. This fixes a bug for
> attachments created via local-local replication. See COUCHDB-1022
> for details.
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
> artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release
> is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release. Please report your
> results and vote to this thread.
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.2 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.2/
>
> Happy voting!
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the third release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.0.2
>
> Changes since the last round:
>
> * Fix raw view document link due to overlealous URI encoding in
> Futon.
> * Spell javascript correctly in loadScript(uri).
> * Preserve purge metadata during compaction to avoid spurious
> view regeneration.
> * Fix spurious conflicts during attachment uploads after a document
> has had a conflict. See COUCHDB-902 for details.
> * Fix multipart GET APIs to always send attachments in compressed
> form when they are compressed on disk. This fixes a bug for
> attachments created via local-local replication. See COUCHDB-1022
> for details.
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
> artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release
> is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release. Please report your
> results and vote to this thread.
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.2 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.2/
>
> Happy voting!
>
+1,
Checked on ubuntu 11.04, openbsd-current, macosx 10.6.6, freebsd 8.1
signatures OK.
js tests OK.
make check OK.
- benoît
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Robert Newson <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> PLUS ONE
I'm sorry but as outlined clearly in the bylaws of voting [1] your
vote must be formatted specifically as a signed numeral. Otherwise I
might get confused and think you're referring to a medical journal
[2].
HTH,
Paul Joseph Davis
[1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
[2] http://www.plosone.org/home.action
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Robert Newson <ro...@gmail.com>.
PLUS ONE
sig is valid
checksums match
make check passes
futon tests pass
OS X 10.6.6, erlang R14B01, spidermonkey 1.8.5, icu4c 4.4.1.
B.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the third release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.0.2
>
> Changes since the last round:
>
> * Fix raw view document link due to overlealous URI encoding in
> Futon.
> * Spell javascript correctly in loadScript(uri).
> * Preserve purge metadata during compaction to avoid spurious
> view regeneration.
> * Fix spurious conflicts during attachment uploads after a document
> has had a conflict. See COUCHDB-902 for details.
> * Fix multipart GET APIs to always send attachments in compressed
> form when they are compressed on disk. This fixes a bug for
> attachments created via local-local replication. See COUCHDB-1022
> for details.
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
> artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release
> is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release. Please report your
> results and vote to this thread.
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.2 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.2/
>
> Happy voting!
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Adam Kocoloski <ko...@apache.org>.
+1 LGTM Paul. Impressive amount of stuff in this point release.
On Jan 20, 2011, at 10:06 AM, Paul Davis wrote:
> This is the third release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.0.2
>
> Changes since the last round:
>
> * Fix raw view document link due to overlealous URI encoding in
> Futon.
> * Spell javascript correctly in loadScript(uri).
> * Preserve purge metadata during compaction to avoid spurious
> view regeneration.
> * Fix spurious conflicts during attachment uploads after a document
> has had a conflict. See COUCHDB-902 for details.
> * Fix multipart GET APIs to always send attachments in compressed
> form when they are compressed on disk. This fixes a bug for
> attachments created via local-local replication. See COUCHDB-1022
> for details.
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
> artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release
> is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release. Please report your
> results and vote to this thread.
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.2 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.2/
>
> Happy voting!
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
On 20 Jan 2011, at 16:06, Paul Davis wrote:
> This is the third release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.0.2
>
> Changes since the last round:
>
> * Fix raw view document link due to overlealous URI encoding in
> Futon.
> * Spell javascript correctly in loadScript(uri).
> * Preserve purge metadata during compaction to avoid spurious
> view regeneration.
> * Fix spurious conflicts during attachment uploads after a document
> has had a conflict. See COUCHDB-902 for details.
> * Fix multipart GET APIs to always send attachments in compressed
> form when they are compressed on disk. This fixes a bug for
> attachments created via local-local replication. See COUCHDB-1022
> for details.
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
> artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release
> is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release. Please report your
> results and vote to this thread.
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.2 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.2/
>
> Happy voting!
+1
(Mac OS X 10.6.6, Ubuntu 10.4, multiple browsers, make check, sigs and all)
Great job and thanks for all the hard work everyone!
Cheers
Jan
--
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Randall Leeds <ra...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 07:06, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the third release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.0.2
>
> Changes since the last round:
>
> * Fix raw view document link due to overlealous URI encoding in
> Futon.
> * Spell javascript correctly in loadScript(uri).
> * Preserve purge metadata during compaction to avoid spurious
> view regeneration.
> * Fix spurious conflicts during attachment uploads after a document
> has had a conflict. See COUCHDB-902 for details.
> * Fix multipart GET APIs to always send attachments in compressed
> form when they are compressed on disk. This fixes a bug for
> attachments created via local-local replication. See COUCHDB-1022
> for details.
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
> artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release
> is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release. Please report your
> results and vote to this thread.
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.2 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.2/
>
> Happy voting!
>
+1
GNU/Linux 2.6.35
Erlang R13B03
SpiderMonkey 1.9.2.14~hg20110121r34884
Firefox 4.0b10
Make check: all tests pass
Futon: all tests pass
Yay!
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
On 27 Jan 2011, at 19:40, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> On 27 January 2011 03:23, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 26 Jan 2011, at 13:03, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>>
>>>> In this case I don't care much if we record any of this (no objections either). What I am after is that the fact that for reliable storage on Windows Erlang R14B1 is required for 1.0.2 should be noted in a place where people downloading or reading up on 1.0.2 are looking (i.e. the release announcement mail, which gets syndicated to many news sites as well as the download page, where, duh, the download happens).
>
> The wiki "Installing on Windows" notes this & I've added a link to the
> unofficial builds I did this week if anybody wishes to test it out
> https://github.com/downloads/dch/couchdb/setup-couchdb-1.0.2_otp_R14B01_spidermonkey_1.8.5.exe
>
>>> Sure. But I'm just trying to clarify how we handle this, so that we can apply it to future releases as well. If there's been a minimum required version in the past, we usually put it in the README.
>>>
>>> We have never, to date, included any minimum version information in either the release announcement or on the downloads page. If the community feels that this is important enough in this case to warrant breaking with that convention, then so be it.
>>>
>>> But I'm trying to get a handle on when this is likely to happen again, so that we can ratify it in our release procedure.
>>
>> Of note is that Windows users don't actually care about this for the
>> most part. Its important to remember that the large majority of
>> Windows users will only be downloading the prebuilt binaries.
>> Therefore, seeing as very few people would actually be building
>> CouchDB on Windows, I would just update the README on whatever
>> branches that it requires R14B01.
>
> Agreed - maybe in INSTALL.Windows then.
This is a satisfactory conclusion. Thanks Dave :)
Cheers
Jan
--
>
>> And since we're not (to my knowledge) announcing Windows support on
>> this release, there's nothing left to really concern ourselves with.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <da...@muse.net.nz>.
On 27 January 2011 03:23, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 26 Jan 2011, at 13:03, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>
>>> In this case I don't care much if we record any of this (no objections either). What I am after is that the fact that for reliable storage on Windows Erlang R14B1 is required for 1.0.2 should be noted in a place where people downloading or reading up on 1.0.2 are looking (i.e. the release announcement mail, which gets syndicated to many news sites as well as the download page, where, duh, the download happens).
The wiki "Installing on Windows" notes this & I've added a link to the
unofficial builds I did this week if anybody wishes to test it out
https://github.com/downloads/dch/couchdb/setup-couchdb-1.0.2_otp_R14B01_spidermonkey_1.8.5.exe
>> Sure. But I'm just trying to clarify how we handle this, so that we can apply it to future releases as well. If there's been a minimum required version in the past, we usually put it in the README.
>>
>> We have never, to date, included any minimum version information in either the release announcement or on the downloads page. If the community feels that this is important enough in this case to warrant breaking with that convention, then so be it.
>>
>> But I'm trying to get a handle on when this is likely to happen again, so that we can ratify it in our release procedure.
>
> Of note is that Windows users don't actually care about this for the
> most part. Its important to remember that the large majority of
> Windows users will only be downloading the prebuilt binaries.
> Therefore, seeing as very few people would actually be building
> CouchDB on Windows, I would just update the README on whatever
> branches that it requires R14B01.
Agreed - maybe in INSTALL.Windows then.
> And since we're not (to my knowledge) announcing Windows support on
> this release, there's nothing left to really concern ourselves with.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 26 Jan 2011, at 13:03, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
>> In this case I don't care much if we record any of this (no objections either). What I am after is that the fact that for reliable storage on Windows Erlang R14B1 is required for 1.0.2 should be noted in a place where people downloading or reading up on 1.0.2 are looking (i.e. the release announcement mail, which gets syndicated to many news sites as well as the download page, where, duh, the download happens).
>
> Sure. But I'm just trying to clarify how we handle this, so that we can apply it to future releases as well. If there's been a minimum required version in the past, we usually put it in the README.
>
> We have never, to date, included any minimum version information in either the release announcement or on the downloads page. If the community feels that this is important enough in this case to warrant breaking with that convention, then so be it.
>
> But I'm trying to get a handle on when this is likely to happen again, so that we can ratify it in our release procedure.
Of note is that Windows users don't actually care about this for the
most part. Its important to remember that the large majority of
Windows users will only be downloading the prebuilt binaries.
Therefore, seeing as very few people would actually be building
CouchDB on Windows, I would just update the README on whatever
branches that it requires R14B01.
And since we're not (to my knowledge) announcing Windows support on
this release, there's nothing left to really concern ourselves with.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
On 26 Jan 2011, at 14:35, Robert Newson wrote:
> I think that rule only applies to live animals.
I'm pretty sure there are restrictions on dead animals too, you know.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Robert Newson <ro...@gmail.com>.
I think that rule only applies to live animals.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Robert Newson <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If my MSDN thing ever goes through from the ASF, I'm prepared to spend
>> some spare time on getting couch working on Windows. It sounds like
>> the OTP issues are resolved, which was the worst part.
>>
>> Do we have enough votes to ship this puppy or what?
>>
>
> We have enough votes but its illegal to ship animals through the USPS
> without filling out a lot of forms. I'd rather avoid it if at all
> possible.
>
>> B.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 26 Jan 2011, at 13:03, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>>
>>>> In this case I don't care much if we record any of this (no objections either). What I am after is that the fact that for reliable storage on Windows Erlang R14B1 is required for 1.0.2 should be noted in a place where people downloading or reading up on 1.0.2 are looking (i.e. the release announcement mail, which gets syndicated to many news sites as well as the download page, where, duh, the download happens).
>>>
>>> Sure. But I'm just trying to clarify how we handle this, so that we can apply it to future releases as well. If there's been a minimum required version in the past, we usually put it in the README.
>>>
>>> We have never, to date, included any minimum version information in either the release announcement or on the downloads page. If the community feels that this is important enough in this case to warrant breaking with that convention, then so be it.
>>>
>>> But I'm trying to get a handle on when this is likely to happen again, so that we can ratify it in our release procedure.
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Robert Newson <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If my MSDN thing ever goes through from the ASF, I'm prepared to spend
> some spare time on getting couch working on Windows. It sounds like
> the OTP issues are resolved, which was the worst part.
>
> Do we have enough votes to ship this puppy or what?
>
We have enough votes but its illegal to ship animals through the USPS
without filling out a lot of forms. I'd rather avoid it if at all
possible.
> B.
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 26 Jan 2011, at 13:03, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>
>>> In this case I don't care much if we record any of this (no objections either). What I am after is that the fact that for reliable storage on Windows Erlang R14B1 is required for 1.0.2 should be noted in a place where people downloading or reading up on 1.0.2 are looking (i.e. the release announcement mail, which gets syndicated to many news sites as well as the download page, where, duh, the download happens).
>>
>> Sure. But I'm just trying to clarify how we handle this, so that we can apply it to future releases as well. If there's been a minimum required version in the past, we usually put it in the README.
>>
>> We have never, to date, included any minimum version information in either the release announcement or on the downloads page. If the community feels that this is important enough in this case to warrant breaking with that convention, then so be it.
>>
>> But I'm trying to get a handle on when this is likely to happen again, so that we can ratify it in our release procedure.
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Robert Newson <ro...@gmail.com>.
If my MSDN thing ever goes through from the ASF, I'm prepared to spend
some spare time on getting couch working on Windows. It sounds like
the OTP issues are resolved, which was the worst part.
Do we have enough votes to ship this puppy or what?
B.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 26 Jan 2011, at 13:03, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
>> In this case I don't care much if we record any of this (no objections either). What I am after is that the fact that for reliable storage on Windows Erlang R14B1 is required for 1.0.2 should be noted in a place where people downloading or reading up on 1.0.2 are looking (i.e. the release announcement mail, which gets syndicated to many news sites as well as the download page, where, duh, the download happens).
>
> Sure. But I'm just trying to clarify how we handle this, so that we can apply it to future releases as well. If there's been a minimum required version in the past, we usually put it in the README.
>
> We have never, to date, included any minimum version information in either the release announcement or on the downloads page. If the community feels that this is important enough in this case to warrant breaking with that convention, then so be it.
>
> But I'm trying to get a handle on when this is likely to happen again, so that we can ratify it in our release procedure.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
On 26 Jan 2011, at 13:03, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> In this case I don't care much if we record any of this (no objections either). What I am after is that the fact that for reliable storage on Windows Erlang R14B1 is required for 1.0.2 should be noted in a place where people downloading or reading up on 1.0.2 are looking (i.e. the release announcement mail, which gets syndicated to many news sites as well as the download page, where, duh, the download happens).
Sure. But I'm just trying to clarify how we handle this, so that we can apply it to future releases as well. If there's been a minimum required version in the past, we usually put it in the README.
We have never, to date, included any minimum version information in either the release announcement or on the downloads page. If the community feels that this is important enough in this case to warrant breaking with that convention, then so be it.
But I'm trying to get a handle on when this is likely to happen again, so that we can ratify it in our release procedure.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
On 26 Jan 2011, at 13:57, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> On 26 Jan 2011, at 12:49, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
>> Do you think we can put this in the release announcement and on the downloads page, too? — Sort of like a post-vote addendum to NEWS without actually changing NEWS?
>
> Could do.
>
> Would we make it a generic recommendation for all users?
>
> No harm in updating NEWS after the release, as long as it is only updated on the branch. However, I'm a little confused. We usually put version number requirements in the README.
In this case I don't care much if we record any of this (no objections either). What I am after is that the fact that for reliable storage on Windows Erlang R14B1 is required for 1.0.2 should be noted in a place where people downloading or reading up on 1.0.2 are looking (i.e. the release announcement mail, which gets syndicated to many news sites as well as the download page, where, duh, the download happens).
Cheers
Jan
--
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
On 26 Jan 2011, at 12:49, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> Do you think we can put this in the release announcement and on the downloads page, too? — Sort of like a post-vote addendum to NEWS without actually changing NEWS?
Could do.
Would we make it a generic recommendation for all users?
No harm in updating NEWS after the release, as long as it is only updated on the branch. However, I'm a little confused. We usually put version number requirements in the README.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
On 26 Jan 2011, at 13:19, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> On 26 Jan 2011, at 05:54, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
>
>> Yup it's fixed - awesome. It *does* mean R14B01 is reqd for windows to
>> avoid potential data loss. Where should this be recorded?
>
> Normally we would put this in one of the README files, but it is probably too late for that. And in any case, we don't really support Windows at this time. I would recommend putting it on the wiki for now, in the appropriate place for folks using Windows.
Do you think we can put this in the release announcement and on the downloads page, too? — Sort of like a post-vote addendum to NEWS without actually changing NEWS?
Cheers
Jan
--
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
On 26 Jan 2011, at 05:54, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> Yup it's fixed - awesome. It *does* mean R14B01 is reqd for windows to
> avoid potential data loss. Where should this be recorded?
Normally we would put this in one of the README files, but it is probably too late for that. And in any case, we don't really support Windows at this time. I would recommend putting it on the wiki for now, in the appropriate place for folks using Windows.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <da...@muse.net.nz>.
On 23 January 2011 00:17, Dave Cottlehuber <da...@muse.net.nz> wrote:
> On 21 January 2011 04:06, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This is the third release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.0.2
>>
>> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/
>>
>> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.2 tag in Subversion:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.2/
>>
>> Happy voting!
>>
>
> +1
>
> Windows 7 x64, erlang R14B01, spidermonkey 1.8.5 (r35345), icu 4.2.1,
> libcurl 7.21.3, openssl 1.0.0c
>
> checksum OK 7ffbbe0f23f672181c89923c9f7a1de1
> make checks fail (but never do on windows anyway)
> futon tests pass (from firefox 4.0b9 MacOS X)
>
> NB it shouldn't affect the release, but I still want to check that the
> 4GiB overwrite issue COUCHDB-852 is closed - Juhani's fix for the
> underlying erlang bug is in R14B01.
Yup it's fixed - awesome. It *does* mean R14B01 is reqd for windows to
avoid potential data loss. Where should this be recorded?
> Cheers
> Dave
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <da...@muse.net.nz>.
On 21 January 2011 04:06, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the third release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.0.2
>
> Changes since the last round:
>
> * Fix raw view document link due to overlealous URI encoding in
> Futon.
> * Spell javascript correctly in loadScript(uri).
> * Preserve purge metadata during compaction to avoid spurious
> view regeneration.
> * Fix spurious conflicts during attachment uploads after a document
> has had a conflict. See COUCHDB-902 for details.
> * Fix multipart GET APIs to always send attachments in compressed
> form when they are compressed on disk. This fixes a bug for
> attachments created via local-local replication. See COUCHDB-1022
> for details.
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
> artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release
> is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release. Please report your
> results and vote to this thread.
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.2 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.2/
>
> Happy voting!
>
+1
Windows 7 x64, erlang R14B01, spidermonkey 1.8.5 (r35345), icu 4.2.1,
libcurl 7.21.3, openssl 1.0.0c
checksum OK 7ffbbe0f23f672181c89923c9f7a1de1
make checks fail (but never do on windows anyway)
futon tests pass (from firefox 4.0b9 MacOS X)
NB it shouldn't affect the release, but I still want to check that the
4GiB overwrite issue COUCHDB-852 is closed - Juhani's fix for the
underlying erlang bug is in R14B01.
Cheers
Dave
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Fedor Indutny <fe...@indutny.com>.
+1
2011/1/20 till <ti...@php.net>
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > This is the third release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.0.2
> >
> > Changes since the last round:
> >
> > * Fix raw view document link due to overlealous URI encoding in
> > Futon.
> > * Spell javascript correctly in loadScript(uri).
> > * Preserve purge metadata during compaction to avoid spurious
> > view regeneration.
> > * Fix spurious conflicts during attachment uploads after a document
> > has had a conflict. See COUCHDB-902 for details.
> > * Fix multipart GET APIs to always send attachments in compressed
> > form when they are compressed on disk. This fixes a bug for
> > attachments created via local-local replication. See COUCHDB-1022
> > for details.
> >
> > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
> > artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release
> > is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release. Please report your
> > results and vote to this thread.
> >
> > We are voting on the following release artifacts:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/
> >
> > These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.2 tag in Subversion:
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.2/
> >
> > Happy voting!
> >
>
> All tests successful.
> Files=34, Tests=528, 43 wallclock secs (14.97 cusr + 1.83 csys = 16.80
> CPU)
>
> Ubuntu 9.10, R13B01, Spidermonkey 1.8.1
> +1
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by till <ti...@php.net>.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the third release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.0.2
>
> Changes since the last round:
>
> * Fix raw view document link due to overlealous URI encoding in
> Futon.
> * Spell javascript correctly in loadScript(uri).
> * Preserve purge metadata during compaction to avoid spurious
> view regeneration.
> * Fix spurious conflicts during attachment uploads after a document
> has had a conflict. See COUCHDB-902 for details.
> * Fix multipart GET APIs to always send attachments in compressed
> form when they are compressed on disk. This fixes a bug for
> attachments created via local-local replication. See COUCHDB-1022
> for details.
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
> artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release
> is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release. Please report your
> results and vote to this thread.
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.2 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.2/
>
> Happy voting!
>
All tests successful.
Files=34, Tests=528, 43 wallclock secs (14.97 cusr + 1.83 csys = 16.80 CPU)
Ubuntu 9.10, R13B01, Spidermonkey 1.8.1
+1
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Klaus Trainer <kl...@web.de>.
+1
Ubuntu 10.10, Firefox 3.6.13, XULRunner 1.9.2.13, Erlang R14B01.
make check: all tests pass
Futon: all tests pass
signatures: ok.
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 10:06 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> This is the third release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.0.2
>
> Changes since the last round:
>
> * Fix raw view document link due to overlealous URI encoding in
> Futon.
> * Spell javascript correctly in loadScript(uri).
> * Preserve purge metadata during compaction to avoid spurious
> view regeneration.
> * Fix spurious conflicts during attachment uploads after a document
> has had a conflict. See COUCHDB-902 for details.
> * Fix multipart GET APIs to always send attachments in compressed
> form when they are compressed on disk. This fixes a bug for
> attachments created via local-local replication. See COUCHDB-1022
> for details.
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
> artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release
> is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release. Please report your
> results and vote to this thread.
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.2 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.2/
>
> Happy voting!
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Filipe David Manana <fd...@apache.org>.
My +1 as well.
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Sebastian Cohnen
<se...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> signatures ok,
> make check ok,
> browser test suite ok (safari + firefox)
>
> on OS X 10.6.6, Erlang R14B01
>
> On 20.01.2011, at 16:06, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> This is the third release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.0.2
>>
>> Changes since the last round:
>>
>> * Fix raw view document link due to overlealous URI encoding in
>> Futon.
>> * Spell javascript correctly in loadScript(uri).
>> * Preserve purge metadata during compaction to avoid spurious
>> view regeneration.
>> * Fix spurious conflicts during attachment uploads after a document
>> has had a conflict. See COUCHDB-902 for details.
>> * Fix multipart GET APIs to always send attachments in compressed
>> form when they are compressed on disk. This fixes a bug for
>> attachments created via local-local replication. See COUCHDB-1022
>> for details.
>>
>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
>> artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release
>> is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release. Please report your
>> results and vote to this thread.
>>
>> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/
>>
>> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.2 tag in Subversion:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.2/
>>
>> Happy voting!
>
>
--
Filipe David Manana,
fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Sebastian Cohnen <se...@googlemail.com>.
+1
signatures ok,
make check ok,
browser test suite ok (safari + firefox)
on OS X 10.6.6, Erlang R14B01
On 20.01.2011, at 16:06, Paul Davis wrote:
> This is the third release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.0.2
>
> Changes since the last round:
>
> * Fix raw view document link due to overlealous URI encoding in
> Futon.
> * Spell javascript correctly in loadScript(uri).
> * Preserve purge metadata during compaction to avoid spurious
> view regeneration.
> * Fix spurious conflicts during attachment uploads after a document
> has had a conflict. See COUCHDB-902 for details.
> * Fix multipart GET APIs to always send attachments in compressed
> form when they are compressed on disk. This fixes a bug for
> attachments created via local-local replication. See COUCHDB-1022
> for details.
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
> artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release
> is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release. Please report your
> results and vote to this thread.
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.2 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.2/
>
> Happy voting!
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>.
Have you got an instance of CouchDB running on the machine you're
testing with? That's usually what causes errors like that.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 16:06, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
>> artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release
>> is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release. Please report your
>> results and vote to this thread.
>>
>> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/
>>
>> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.2 tag in Subversion:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.2/
>
> This is what I get from my Gentoo Linux setup:
>
> Test Summary Report
> -------------------
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/070-couch-db.t
> (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
> Non-zero exit status: 1
> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 4 tests but ran 0.
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/110-replication-httpc.t
> (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
> Non-zero exit status: 1
> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 6 tests but ran 0.
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/111-replication-changes-feed.t
> (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
> Non-zero exit status: 1
> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 13 tests but ran 0.
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/112-replication-missing-revs.t
> (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
> Non-zero exit status: 1
> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 12 tests but ran 0.
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/113-replication-attachment-comp.t
> (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
> Non-zero exit status: 1
> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 45 tests but ran 0.
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/130-attachments-md5.t
> (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
> Non-zero exit status: 1
> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 16 tests but ran 0.
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/140-attachment-comp.t
> (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
> Non-zero exit status: 1
> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 86 tests but ran 0.
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/150-invalid-view-seq.t
> (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
> Non-zero exit status: 1
> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 10 tests but ran 0.
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/160-vhosts.t
> (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
> Non-zero exit status: 1
> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 4 tests but ran 0.
> Files=34, Tests=332, 42 wallclock secs ( 0.29 usr 0.09 sys + 16.02
> cusr 21.21 csys = 37.61 CPU)
> Result: FAIL
>
> Where did I go wrong with this?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dirkjan
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 01:02, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is there any update on this issue?
>>
>> Seeing as the tests are passing for everyone else for everything as
>> well as the fact that these are the tests that fail when you try
>> running make check with CouchDB running I'll assume it was just that
>> for now.
>
> You assumed correctly...
>
> Sorry for not getting back to you, I wanted to run the in-browser test
> suite as well, didn't get around to it and then left for a skiing
> holiday.
>
> Perhaps the test suite could throw a clearer error message if I have a
> Couch already running, or (even better), run the tests against a Couch
> running on some random port.
>
> Also, I saw 1.0.2 is out now, thanks so much for all the hard work.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dirkjan
>
Yeah, we've been meaning to make those tests use a random port for
tests. Its even a problem for people that run multiple continuous
integration builds simultaneously.
Thanks for testing the release.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 01:02, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there any update on this issue?
>
> Seeing as the tests are passing for everyone else for everything as
> well as the fact that these are the tests that fail when you try
> running make check with CouchDB running I'll assume it was just that
> for now.
You assumed correctly...
Sorry for not getting back to you, I wanted to run the in-browser test
suite as well, didn't get around to it and then left for a skiing
holiday.
Perhaps the test suite could throw a clearer error message if I have a
Couch already running, or (even better), run the tests against a Couch
running on some random port.
Also, I saw 1.0.2 is out now, thanks so much for all the hard work.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>.
Is there any update on this issue?
Seeing as the tests are passing for everyone else for everything as
well as the fact that these are the tests that fail when you try
running make check with CouchDB running I'll assume it was just that
for now.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 16:06, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
>> artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release
>> is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release. Please report your
>> results and vote to this thread.
>>
>> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/
>>
>> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.2 tag in Subversion:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.2/
>
> This is what I get from my Gentoo Linux setup:
>
> Test Summary Report
> -------------------
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/070-couch-db.t
> (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
> Non-zero exit status: 1
> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 4 tests but ran 0.
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/110-replication-httpc.t
> (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
> Non-zero exit status: 1
> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 6 tests but ran 0.
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/111-replication-changes-feed.t
> (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
> Non-zero exit status: 1
> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 13 tests but ran 0.
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/112-replication-missing-revs.t
> (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
> Non-zero exit status: 1
> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 12 tests but ran 0.
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/113-replication-attachment-comp.t
> (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
> Non-zero exit status: 1
> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 45 tests but ran 0.
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/130-attachments-md5.t
> (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
> Non-zero exit status: 1
> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 16 tests but ran 0.
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/140-attachment-comp.t
> (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
> Non-zero exit status: 1
> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 86 tests but ran 0.
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/150-invalid-view-seq.t
> (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
> Non-zero exit status: 1
> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 10 tests but ran 0.
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/160-vhosts.t
> (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
> Non-zero exit status: 1
> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 4 tests but ran 0.
> Files=34, Tests=332, 42 wallclock secs ( 0.29 usr 0.09 sys + 16.02
> cusr 21.21 csys = 37.61 CPU)
> Result: FAIL
>
> Where did I go wrong with this?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dirkjan
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 16:06, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
> artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release
> is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release. Please report your
> results and vote to this thread.
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.2 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.2/
This is what I get from my Gentoo Linux setup:
Test Summary Report
-------------------
/var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/070-couch-db.t
(Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 4 tests but ran 0.
/var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/110-replication-httpc.t
(Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 6 tests but ran 0.
/var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/111-replication-changes-feed.t
(Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 13 tests but ran 0.
/var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/112-replication-missing-revs.t
(Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 12 tests but ran 0.
/var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/113-replication-attachment-comp.t
(Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 45 tests but ran 0.
/var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/130-attachments-md5.t
(Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 16 tests but ran 0.
/var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/140-attachment-comp.t
(Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 86 tests but ran 0.
/var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/150-invalid-view-seq.t
(Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 10 tests but ran 0.
/var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/160-vhosts.t
(Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 4 tests but ran 0.
Files=34, Tests=332, 42 wallclock secs ( 0.29 usr 0.09 sys + 16.02
cusr 21.21 csys = 37.61 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Where did I go wrong with this?
Cheers,
Dirkjan
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
On 20 Jan 2011, at 15:06, Paul Davis wrote:
> This is the third release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.0.2
+1
Hashes and signature: ok
Comparison with source tag: ok
Updated release files: ok
Successful build: ok
Futon tests: ok
DOIT
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Robert Newson <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Release engineers are such hard asses.
>
> +1
>
> :P
>
I haven't even gotten to that chapter in the release engineering
handbook. I must be a natural.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Robert Newson <ro...@gmail.com>.
Release engineers are such hard asses.
+1
:P
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Robert Dionne
<di...@dionne-associates.com> wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Jan 20, 2011, at 10:06 AM, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> This is the third release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.0.2
>>
>> Changes since the last round:
>>
>> * Fix raw view document link due to overlealous URI encoding in
>> Futon.
>> * Spell javascript correctly in loadScript(uri).
>> * Preserve purge metadata during compaction to avoid spurious
>> view regeneration.
>> * Fix spurious conflicts during attachment uploads after a document
>> has had a conflict. See COUCHDB-902 for details.
>> * Fix multipart GET APIs to always send attachments in compressed
>> form when they are compressed on disk. This fixes a bug for
>> attachments created via local-local replication. See COUCHDB-1022
>> for details.
>>
>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
>> artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release
>> is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release. Please report your
>> results and vote to this thread.
>>
>> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/
>>
>> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.2 tag in Subversion:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.2/
>>
>> Happy voting!
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3
Posted by Robert Dionne <di...@dionne-associates.com>.
+1
On Jan 20, 2011, at 10:06 AM, Paul Davis wrote:
> This is the third release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.0.2
>
> Changes since the last round:
>
> * Fix raw view document link due to overlealous URI encoding in
> Futon.
> * Spell javascript correctly in loadScript(uri).
> * Preserve purge metadata during compaction to avoid spurious
> view regeneration.
> * Fix spurious conflicts during attachment uploads after a document
> has had a conflict. See COUCHDB-902 for details.
> * Fix multipart GET APIs to always send attachments in compressed
> form when they are compressed on disk. This fixes a bug for
> attachments created via local-local replication. See COUCHDB-1022
> for details.
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
> artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release
> is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release. Please report your
> results and vote to this thread.
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.2 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.2/
>
> Happy voting!