You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> on 2017/11/02 14:15:18 UTC
[VOTE] uimaj-3.0.0-beta-rc8
Hi everyone,
Here's rc8 for uimaj 3.0.0-beta.
The changes since rc7 include some xml constants fixups to not depend on java
classes that may not be present in various versions of Java.
Also included are general improvements in adding generic typing to many UIMA
structures, updates to add missing javadocs, missing APIs in the jcas interface
for getting "empty" lists, and some upgrades to the main documentation and
examples to better reflect v3 idioms.
The updates to generic typing are designed to not break existing code, and it
seems to be OK as far as I was able to test; it would be great if you could test
this against other big projects (like dk-pro) to see if anything got missed.
Here are the Jiras:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2012310570%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%2012339590%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
Maven artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1165/
Source and binary zip/tar staged to:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc8/artifacts/
Eclipse update subsite:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc8/uimaj-v3-pre-production/
SVN tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uv3/uimaj-v3/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-beta/
Please vote on release:
[ ] +1 OK to release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
Thanks.
-Marshall
Re: [VOTE] uimaj-3.0.0-beta-rc8
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
signatures OK
install binary distr, run document analyzer, examine results with doc viewer - OK
compare source-release with tag: OK
Install plugins into Eclipse Oxygen, run CDE, create type descriptor, run
JCasGen: OK
Run both migrate tool and document analyzer from Eclipse after importing
examples project from binary distribution: OK
issues-fixed and api change report OK
build-from-source: OK
compare rc7 and rc8: OK
no changes to license/ notices
[X] +1 OK to release
- -Marshall Schor
On 11/2/2017 10:15 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> Hi everyone, > > Here's rc8 for uimaj 3.0.0-beta. > > The changes since rc7 include some xml
constants fixups to not depend on java > classes that may not be present in
various versions of Java. > > Also included are general improvements in adding
generic typing to many UIMA > structures, updates to add missing javadocs,
missing APIs in the jcas interface > for getting "empty" lists, and some
upgrades to the main documentation and > examples to better reflect v3 idioms. >
> The updates to generic typing are designed to not break existing code, and it
> seems to be OK as far as I was able to test; it would be great if you could
test > this against other big projects (like dk-pro) to see if anything got
missed. > > Here are the Jiras: > >
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2012310570%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%2012339590%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
> > Maven artifacts: >
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1165/ > >
Source and binary zip/tar staged to: >
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc8/artifacts/ > >
Eclipse update subsite: >
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc8/uimaj-v3-pre-production/
> > SVN tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uv3/uimaj-v3/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-beta/ > >
Please vote on release: > > [ ] +1 OK to release > [ ] 0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Not
OK to release, because ... > > Thanks. > > -Marshall > >
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=Z9+w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [VOTE] uimaj-3.0.0-beta-rc8
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Hi Richard, thanks for testing !
The statement about working with Java 8 or later could represent just wishful
thinking...
The original Java 9 implementation had "issues" when Java applications were
migrated to it; the Java 9 release was delayed to allow those to be worked on.
I haven't "tested" anything since then, so I don't know if this would work with
Java 9 or not...
-Marshall
On 11/5/2017 8:07 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>> On 02.11.2017, at 15:15, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>
>> Please vote on release:
> - DKPro Core building against RC: ok
> - diff SVN tag <-> source ZIP: ok
> - local build with JDK 8 (empty local repo): ok
> - checked svn diff to the last RC I checked: ok
> - license-relevant changes: none
> - Installed plugins from update site into new Eclipse, imported example project and ran example: ok
> - signature spot check: ok
>
> Nice updates to the examples and documentation!
>
> The docs now say that UIMA works "with Java 8 or later". Are we compatible with Java 9 already?
> The respective Jenkins build is currently disabled.
>
>> [X] +1 OK to release
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
> Cheers,
>
> -- Richard
Re: [VOTE] uimaj-3.0.0-beta-rc8
Posted by Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org>.
> On 02.11.2017, at 15:15, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>
> Please vote on release:
- DKPro Core building against RC: ok
- diff SVN tag <-> source ZIP: ok
- local build with JDK 8 (empty local repo): ok
- checked svn diff to the last RC I checked: ok
- license-relevant changes: none
- Installed plugins from update site into new Eclipse, imported example project and ran example: ok
- signature spot check: ok
Nice updates to the examples and documentation!
The docs now say that UIMA works "with Java 8 or later". Are we compatible with Java 9 already?
The respective Jenkins build is currently disabled.
> [X] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
Cheers,
-- Richard
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] uimaj-3.0.0-beta-rc8
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
The vote passes, with 3 +1 votes received and no other votes.
+1 Marshall Schor
+1 Richard Eckart de Castilho
+1 Burn Lewis.
Thanks for the testing! -Marshall
On 11/2/2017 10:15 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Here's rc8 for uimaj 3.0.0-beta.
>
> The changes since rc7 include some xml constants fixups to not depend on java
> classes that may not be present in various versions of Java.
>
> Also included are general improvements in adding generic typing to many UIMA
> structures, updates to add missing javadocs, missing APIs in the jcas interface
> for getting "empty" lists, and some upgrades to the main documentation and
> examples to better reflect v3 idioms.
>
> The updates to generic typing are designed to not break existing code, and it
> seems to be OK as far as I was able to test; it would be great if you could test
> this against other big projects (like dk-pro) to see if anything got missed.
>
> Here are the Jiras:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2012310570%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%2012339590%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
>
> Maven artifacts:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1165/
>
> Source and binary zip/tar staged to:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc8/artifacts/
>
> Eclipse update subsite:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc8/uimaj-v3-pre-production/
>
> SVN tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uv3/uimaj-v3/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-beta/
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Marshall
>
>
Re: [VOTE] uimaj-3.0.0-beta-rc8
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Thanks for the good feedback Burn, and apologies the migration was painful!
Let's learn from the pain... I'll put in some Jira's for improvement, as I gain
sufficient understanding to do this :-)
-Marshall
On 11/9/2017 11:32 AM, Burn Lewis wrote:
> - checked signatures on binary
> - built from source and checked signatures
> - ran a couple UIMA pipelines on both builds
> - migrated a pipeline with many types and ran it on both builds
> - spot-checked readme etc.
>
> [X] +1 OK to release
>
> Minor complaints:
> - JCasImpl has a getType method that throws "UIMA V2 operation not
> supported in V3" ... perhaps it should refer to a section in the docs about
> changes to internal classes and suggested alternatives.
>
> - migration of a large set of projects is painful -
> When sourcesRoots contains multiple projects the converted classes are put
> in the same folder making it difficult to copy them to the appropriate
> project. Perhaps an in-place option could be supported which could be used
> after verifying that an earlier migration has succeeded, or by relying on
> a source control system to undo any unwanted changes. This option could
> also delete the obsolete xxx_Type classes.
> Also the migrated source should include a comment recording the migration,
> and should retain comments such as. copyright headers.
> Would it help to suggest re-running jcasgen instead of converting the jcas
> classes?
>
> Burn
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <cw...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> working on it now ... will vote this afternoon
>>
>> -Jerry
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>
>>> gentle reminder ... one more vote needed ... -Marshall
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/2/2017 10:15 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Here's rc8 for uimaj 3.0.0-beta.
>>>>
>>>> The changes since rc7 include some xml constants fixups to not depend
>> on
>>> java
>>>> classes that may not be present in various versions of Java.
>>>>
>>>> Also included are general improvements in adding generic typing to many
>>> UIMA
>>>> structures, updates to add missing javadocs, missing APIs in the jcas
>>> interface
>>>> for getting "empty" lists, and some upgrades to the main documentation
>>> and
>>>> examples to better reflect v3 idioms.
>>>>
>>>> The updates to generic typing are designed to not break existing code,
>>> and it
>>>> seems to be OK as far as I was able to test; it would be great if you
>>> could test
>>>> this against other big projects (like dk-pro) to see if anything got
>>> missed.
>>>> Here are the Jiras:
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
>>> 3D%2012310570%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%2012339590%
>>> 20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
>>>> Maven artifacts:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1165/
>>>>
>>>> Source and binary zip/tar staged to:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-
>>> beta-rc8/artifacts/
>>>> Eclipse update subsite:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-
>>> beta-rc8/uimaj-v3-pre-production/
>>>> SVN tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uv3/uimaj-v3/tags/
>>> uimaj-3.0.0-beta/
>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> -Marshall
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] uimaj-3.0.0-beta-rc8
Posted by Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com>.
- checked signatures on binary
- built from source and checked signatures
- ran a couple UIMA pipelines on both builds
- migrated a pipeline with many types and ran it on both builds
- spot-checked readme etc.
[X] +1 OK to release
Minor complaints:
- JCasImpl has a getType method that throws "UIMA V2 operation not
supported in V3" ... perhaps it should refer to a section in the docs about
changes to internal classes and suggested alternatives.
- migration of a large set of projects is painful -
When sourcesRoots contains multiple projects the converted classes are put
in the same folder making it difficult to copy them to the appropriate
project. Perhaps an in-place option could be supported which could be used
after verifying that an earlier migration has succeeded, or by relying on
a source control system to undo any unwanted changes. This option could
also delete the obsolete xxx_Type classes.
Also the migrated source should include a comment recording the migration,
and should retain comments such as. copyright headers.
Would it help to suggest re-running jcasgen instead of converting the jcas
classes?
Burn
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <cw...@apache.org>
wrote:
> working on it now ... will vote this afternoon
>
> -Jerry
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>
> > gentle reminder ... one more vote needed ... -Marshall
> >
> >
> > On 11/2/2017 10:15 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > Here's rc8 for uimaj 3.0.0-beta.
> > >
> > > The changes since rc7 include some xml constants fixups to not depend
> on
> > java
> > > classes that may not be present in various versions of Java.
> > >
> > > Also included are general improvements in adding generic typing to many
> > UIMA
> > > structures, updates to add missing javadocs, missing APIs in the jcas
> > interface
> > > for getting "empty" lists, and some upgrades to the main documentation
> > and
> > > examples to better reflect v3 idioms.
> > >
> > > The updates to generic typing are designed to not break existing code,
> > and it
> > > seems to be OK as far as I was able to test; it would be great if you
> > could test
> > > this against other big projects (like dk-pro) to see if anything got
> > missed.
> > >
> > > Here are the Jiras:
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
> > 3D%2012310570%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%2012339590%
> > 20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
> > >
> > > Maven artifacts:
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1165/
> > >
> > > Source and binary zip/tar staged to:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-
> > beta-rc8/artifacts/
> > >
> > > Eclipse update subsite:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-
> > beta-rc8/uimaj-v3-pre-production/
> > >
> > > SVN tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uv3/uimaj-v3/tags/
> > uimaj-3.0.0-beta/
> > >
> > > Please vote on release:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 OK to release
> > > [ ] 0 Don't care
> > > [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > -Marshall
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] uimaj-3.0.0-beta-rc8
Posted by Jaroslaw Cwiklik <cw...@apache.org>.
working on it now ... will vote this afternoon
-Jerry
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> gentle reminder ... one more vote needed ... -Marshall
>
>
> On 11/2/2017 10:15 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Here's rc8 for uimaj 3.0.0-beta.
> >
> > The changes since rc7 include some xml constants fixups to not depend on
> java
> > classes that may not be present in various versions of Java.
> >
> > Also included are general improvements in adding generic typing to many
> UIMA
> > structures, updates to add missing javadocs, missing APIs in the jcas
> interface
> > for getting "empty" lists, and some upgrades to the main documentation
> and
> > examples to better reflect v3 idioms.
> >
> > The updates to generic typing are designed to not break existing code,
> and it
> > seems to be OK as far as I was able to test; it would be great if you
> could test
> > this against other big projects (like dk-pro) to see if anything got
> missed.
> >
> > Here are the Jiras:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
> 3D%2012310570%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%2012339590%
> 20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
> >
> > Maven artifacts:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1165/
> >
> > Source and binary zip/tar staged to:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-
> beta-rc8/artifacts/
> >
> > Eclipse update subsite:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-
> beta-rc8/uimaj-v3-pre-production/
> >
> > SVN tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uv3/uimaj-v3/tags/
> uimaj-3.0.0-beta/
> >
> > Please vote on release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 OK to release
> > [ ] 0 Don't care
> > [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > -Marshall
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] uimaj-3.0.0-beta-rc8
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
gentle reminder ... one more vote needed ... -Marshall
On 11/2/2017 10:15 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Here's rc8 for uimaj 3.0.0-beta.
>
> The changes since rc7 include some xml constants fixups to not depend on java
> classes that may not be present in various versions of Java.
>
> Also included are general improvements in adding generic typing to many UIMA
> structures, updates to add missing javadocs, missing APIs in the jcas interface
> for getting "empty" lists, and some upgrades to the main documentation and
> examples to better reflect v3 idioms.
>
> The updates to generic typing are designed to not break existing code, and it
> seems to be OK as far as I was able to test; it would be great if you could test
> this against other big projects (like dk-pro) to see if anything got missed.
>
> Here are the Jiras:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2012310570%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%2012339590%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
>
> Maven artifacts:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1165/
>
> Source and binary zip/tar staged to:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc8/artifacts/
>
> Eclipse update subsite:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc8/uimaj-v3-pre-production/
>
> SVN tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uv3/uimaj-v3/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-beta/
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Marshall
>
>