You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to docs@httpd.apache.org by Daniel Gruno <ru...@cord.dk> on 2013/05/07 12:41:55 UTC
Thinking about adding a link to modules.a.o on our web site.
Hi all,
I did some talking with Jim and Rich (or was it Rainer, I forget) during
ApacheCon, in which we agreed that we need to plug our modules directory
some more. I totally forgot all about this, but since it's never too
late to get something like this done, I am now contemplating adding a
link from our web site, httpd.apache.org, to modules.apache.org in the
navigation bar on the left side.
I don't see this as a big issue that needs a vote, so I'll let it simmer
for a while (standard 72 hours) and assume lazy consensus if I hear no
objections from you lot.
With regards,
Daniel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: Thinking about adding a link to modules.a.o on our web site.
Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
> Links don't imply endorsement (although maybe we need to say that
> explicitly), so I think that links are a very good thing when they help real
> people solve real problems.
I think a link with a short disclaimer is a good idea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: Thinking about adding a link to modules.a.o on our web site.
Posted by Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com>.
Links don't imply endorsement (although maybe we need to say that explicitly), so I think that links are a very good thing when they help real people solve real problems.
So, +1
On May 7, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Hi all,
> I did some talking with Jim and Rich (or was it Rainer, I forget) during
> ApacheCon, in which we agreed that we need to plug our modules directory
> some more. I totally forgot all about this, but since it's never too
> late to get something like this done, I am now contemplating adding a
> link from our web site, httpd.apache.org, to modules.apache.org in the
> navigation bar on the left side.
>
> I don't see this as a big issue that needs a vote, so I'll let it simmer
> for a while (standard 72 hours) and assume lazy consensus if I hear no
> objections from you lot.
>
> With regards,
> Daniel.
--
Rich Bowen
rbowen@rcbowen.com
Shosholoza
Re: Thinking about adding a link to modules.a.o on our web site.
Posted by Gregg Smith <gl...@gknw.net>.
On 5/7/2013 3:41 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Hi all,
> I did some talking with Jim and Rich (or was it Rainer, I forget) during
> ApacheCon, in which we agreed that we need to plug our modules directory
> some more. I totally forgot all about this, but since it's never too
> late to get something like this done, I am now contemplating adding a
> link from our web site, httpd.apache.org, to modules.apache.org in the
> navigation bar on the left side.
Isn't this already there. I see "Modules" in the Subprojects menu that
leads to a page where modules.a.o is first thing mentioned.
Gregg
Re: Thinking about adding a link to modules.a.o on our web site.
Posted by Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com>.
Links don't imply endorsement (although maybe we need to say that explicitly), so I think that links are a very good thing when they help real people solve real problems.
So, +1
On May 7, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Hi all,
> I did some talking with Jim and Rich (or was it Rainer, I forget) during
> ApacheCon, in which we agreed that we need to plug our modules directory
> some more. I totally forgot all about this, but since it's never too
> late to get something like this done, I am now contemplating adding a
> link from our web site, httpd.apache.org, to modules.apache.org in the
> navigation bar on the left side.
>
> I don't see this as a big issue that needs a vote, so I'll let it simmer
> for a while (standard 72 hours) and assume lazy consensus if I hear no
> objections from you lot.
>
> With regards,
> Daniel.
--
Rich Bowen
rbowen@rcbowen.com
Shosholoza